From patchwork Wed Jun 28 05:43:30 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Qu Wenruo X-Patchwork-Id: 9813495 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B569C60365 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 05:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA89F283CB for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 05:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 9EF53283FD; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 05:43:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34CD283CB for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 05:43:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751837AbdF1Fnv (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2017 01:43:51 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([59.151.112.132]:3961 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751587AbdF1Fns (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2017 01:43:48 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,518,1449504000"; d="scan'208";a="20582854" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 28 Jun 2017 13:43:43 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.83]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17C147F64D4; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:43:39 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.167.226.34) by G08CNEXCHPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:43:38 +0800 From: Qu Wenruo To: , CC: , , , Anand Jain Subject: [PATCH v4 1/6] btrfs: Introduce a function to check if all chunks a OK for degraded rw mount Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:43:30 +0800 Message-ID: <20170628054335.18806-2-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.13.1 In-Reply-To: <20170628054335.18806-1-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <20170628054335.18806-1-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.167.226.34] X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: E17C147F64D4.A1509 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Introduce a new function, btrfs_check_rw_degradable(), to check if all chunks in btrfs is OK for degraded rw mount. It provides the new basis for accurate btrfs mount/remount and even runtime degraded mount check other than old one-size-fit-all method. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: Anand Jain --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index c95f018d4a1e..7a72fbdb8262 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -6817,6 +6817,64 @@ int btrfs_read_sys_array(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) return -EIO; } +/* + * Check if all chunks in the fs is OK for read-write degraded mount + * + * Return true if all chunks meet the minimal RW mount requirement. + * Return false if any chunk doesn't meet the minimal RW mount requirement. + */ +bool btrfs_check_rw_degradable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) +{ + struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree; + struct extent_map *em; + u64 next_start = 0; + bool ret = true; + + read_lock(&map_tree->map_tree.lock); + em = lookup_extent_mapping(&map_tree->map_tree, 0, (u64)-1); + read_unlock(&map_tree->map_tree.lock); + /* No chunk at all? Return false anyway */ + if (!em) { + ret = false; + goto out; + } + while (em) { + struct map_lookup *map; + int missing = 0; + int max_tolerated; + int i; + + map = em->map_lookup; + max_tolerated = + btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures( + map->type); + for (i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) { + struct btrfs_device *dev = map->stripes[i].dev; + + if (!dev || !dev->bdev || dev->missing || + dev->last_flush_error) + missing++; + } + if (missing > max_tolerated) { + ret = false; + btrfs_warn(fs_info, + "chunk %llu missing %d devices, max tolerance is %d for writeble mount", + em->start, missing, max_tolerated); + free_extent_map(em); + goto out; + } + next_start = extent_map_end(em); + free_extent_map(em); + + read_lock(&map_tree->map_tree.lock); + em = lookup_extent_mapping(&map_tree->map_tree, next_start, + (u64)(-1) - next_start); + read_unlock(&map_tree->map_tree.lock); + } +out: + return ret; +} + int btrfs_read_chunk_tree(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) { struct btrfs_root *root = fs_info->chunk_root; diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h index 6f45fd60d15a..a5897c7a7e86 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h @@ -543,4 +543,5 @@ struct list_head *btrfs_get_fs_uuids(void); void btrfs_set_fs_info_ptr(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info); void btrfs_reset_fs_info_ptr(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info); +bool btrfs_check_rw_degradable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info); #endif