Message ID | 20170811021317.ykbpots4vinw7yjb@angband.pl (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 8/10/17, 7:13 PM, "Adam Borowski" <kilobyte@angband.pl> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 07:39:02PM -0700, Nick Terrell wrote: >> Add zstd compression and decompression support to BtrFS. > > Re-tested on arm64, amd64 and i386, this time everything seems fine so far. > > As I'm too lazy to have a separate test setup for the zlib level patch, > I'm using a dummy implementation: > > --- a/fs/btrfs/zstd.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/zstd.c > @@ -423,10 +423,16 @@ static int zstd_decompress(struct list_head *ws, unsigned char *data_in, > return ret; > } > > +static void zstd_set_level(struct list_head *ws, unsigned int type) > +{ > + // TODO > +} > + > const struct btrfs_compress_op btrfs_zstd_compress = { > .alloc_workspace = zstd_alloc_workspace, > .free_workspace = zstd_free_workspace, > .compress_pages = zstd_compress_pages, > .decompress_bio = zstd_decompress_bio, > .decompress = zstd_decompress, > + .set_level = zstd_set_level, > }; > > > It might be worthwhile to do some early testing using different levels, > though. I'll run some preliminary tests and make sure nothing blows up and the compression ratio looks good. > > > 喵! > -- > ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ > ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ A dumb species has no way to open a tuna can. > ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ A smart species invents a can opener. > ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ A master species delegates.
--- a/fs/btrfs/zstd.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/zstd.c @@ -423,10 +423,16 @@ static int zstd_decompress(struct list_head *ws, unsigned char *data_in, return ret; } +static void zstd_set_level(struct list_head *ws, unsigned int type) +{ + // TODO +} + const struct btrfs_compress_op btrfs_zstd_compress = { .alloc_workspace = zstd_alloc_workspace, .free_workspace = zstd_free_workspace, .compress_pages = zstd_compress_pages, .decompress_bio = zstd_decompress_bio, .decompress = zstd_decompress, + .set_level = zstd_set_level, };
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 07:39:02PM -0700, Nick Terrell wrote: > Add zstd compression and decompression support to BtrFS. Re-tested on arm64, amd64 and i386, this time everything seems fine so far. As I'm too lazy to have a separate test setup for the zlib level patch, I'm using a dummy implementation: It might be worthwhile to do some early testing using different levels, though. 喵!