From patchwork Fri Jan 12 03:08:02 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Su Yue X-Patchwork-Id: 10159575 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8DA602D8 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 03:03:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714ED2881E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 03:03:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 65FBB28859; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 03:03:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C082884B for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 03:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932882AbeALDDr (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jan 2018 22:03:47 -0500 Received: from mail.cn.fujitsu.com ([183.91.158.132]:56239 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932812AbeALDDq (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jan 2018 22:03:46 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,368,1503331200"; d="scan'208";a="35225140" Received: from bogon (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2018 11:03:42 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD03.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.85]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B66486A78B for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:03:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from archlinux.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.226.31) by G08CNEXCHPEKD03.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:03:39 +0800 From: Su Yue To: CC: Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: correct wrong comment about magic number of index_cnt Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:08:02 +0800 Message-ID: <20180112030803.28341-1-suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.167.226.31] X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 63B66486A78B.A7E29 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP There is no function named btrfs_get_inode_index_count. Explanation for magic number index_cnt=2 in btrfs_new_inode() is actually located in btrfs_set_inode_index_count(). So replace 'btrfs_get_inode_index_count' in the comment by 'btrfs_set_inode_index_count'. Signed-off-by: Su Yue --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 37bdb78b4766..f6454719192e 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -6315,7 +6315,7 @@ static struct inode *btrfs_new_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, } /* * index_cnt is ignored for everything but a dir, - * btrfs_get_inode_index_count has an explanation for the magic + * btrfs_set_inode_index_count has an explanation for the magic * number */ BTRFS_I(inode)->index_cnt = 2;