Message ID | 20180611182416.18051-1-fdmanana@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 07:24:16PM +0100, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote: > From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> > > If we failed during a rename exchange operation after starting/joining a > transaction, we would end up replacing the return value, stored in the > local 'ret' variable, with the return value from btrfs_end_transaction(). > So this could end up returning 0 (success) to user space despite the > operation having failed and aborted the transaction, because if there are > multiple tasks having a reference on the transaction at the time > btrfs_end_transaction() is called by the rename exchange, that function > returns 0 (otherwise it returns -EIO and not the original error value). > So fix this by not overwriting the return value on error after getting > a transaction handle. > > Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> 1 and 2 queued for 4.18, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 2:38 PM, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 07:24:16PM +0100, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote: >> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> >> >> If we failed during a rename exchange operation after starting/joining a >> transaction, we would end up replacing the return value, stored in the >> local 'ret' variable, with the return value from btrfs_end_transaction(). >> So this could end up returning 0 (success) to user space despite the >> operation having failed and aborted the transaction, because if there are >> multiple tasks having a reference on the transaction at the time >> btrfs_end_transaction() is called by the rename exchange, that function >> returns 0 (otherwise it returns -EIO and not the original error value). >> So fix this by not overwriting the return value on error after getting >> a transaction handle. >> >> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> > > 1 and 2 queued for 4.18, thanks. Please removed the 2nd patch, because I just ran into a deadlock between syncing the log and transaction kthread commiting the transaction while a rename was in progress. I'll send a v2 once I understand better the problem and have a fix. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 89b208201783..2bb893aa54da 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -9445,6 +9445,7 @@ static int btrfs_rename_exchange(struct inode *old_dir, u64 new_idx = 0; u64 root_objectid; int ret; + int ret2; bool root_log_pinned = false; bool dest_log_pinned = false; @@ -9641,7 +9642,8 @@ static int btrfs_rename_exchange(struct inode *old_dir, dest_log_pinned = false; } } - ret = btrfs_end_transaction(trans); + ret2 = btrfs_end_transaction(trans); + ret = ret ? ret : ret2; out_notrans: if (new_ino == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID) up_read(&fs_info->subvol_sem);