[V2,19/29] lockdep: Simplify stack trace handling

Commit Message

Thomas Gleixner April 18, 2019, 8:41 a.m. UTC

Replace the indirection through struct stack_trace by using the storage
array based interfaces and storing the information is a small lockdep
specific data structure.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[e-mail]>
---
 include/linux/lockdep.h  |    9 +++++++--
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c |   44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

Comments

Peter Zijlstra April 24, 2019, 7:45 p.m. UTC | #1

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:41:38AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Replace the indirection through struct stack_trace by using the storage
> array based interfaces and storing the information is a small lockdep
> specific data structure.
> 

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[e-mail]>

Patch

--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -66,6 +66,11 @@  struct lock_class_key {
 
 extern struct lock_class_key __lockdep_no_validate__;
 
+struct lock_trace {
+	unsigned int		nr_entries;
+	unsigned int		offset;
+};
+
 #define LOCKSTAT_POINTS		4
 
 /*
@@ -100,7 +105,7 @@  struct lock_class {
 	 * IRQ/softirq usage tracking bits:
 	 */
 	unsigned long			usage_mask;
-	struct stack_trace		usage_traces[XXX_LOCK_USAGE_STATES];
+	struct lock_trace		usage_traces[XXX_LOCK_USAGE_STATES];
 
 	/*
 	 * Generation counter, when doing certain classes of graph walking,
@@ -188,7 +193,7 @@  struct lock_list {
 	struct list_head		entry;
 	struct lock_class		*class;
 	struct lock_class		*links_to;
-	struct stack_trace		trace;
+	struct lock_trace		trace;
 	int				distance;
 
 	/*
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -434,18 +434,14 @@  static void print_lockdep_off(const char
 #endif
 }
 
-static int save_trace(struct stack_trace *trace)
+static int save_trace(struct lock_trace *trace)
 {
-	trace->nr_entries = 0;
-	trace->max_entries = MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES - nr_stack_trace_entries;
-	trace->entries = stack_trace + nr_stack_trace_entries;
-
-	trace->skip = 3;
-
-	save_stack_trace(trace);
-
-	trace->max_entries = trace->nr_entries;
+	unsigned long *entries = stack_trace + nr_stack_trace_entries;
+	unsigned int max_entries;
 
+	trace->offset = nr_stack_trace_entries;
+	max_entries = MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES - nr_stack_trace_entries;
+	trace->nr_entries = stack_trace_save(entries, max_entries, 3);
 	nr_stack_trace_entries += trace->nr_entries;
 
 	if (nr_stack_trace_entries >= MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES-1) {
@@ -1196,7 +1192,7 @@  static struct lock_list *alloc_list_entr
 static int add_lock_to_list(struct lock_class *this,
 			    struct lock_class *links_to, struct list_head *head,
 			    unsigned long ip, int distance,
-			    struct stack_trace *trace)
+			    struct lock_trace *trace)
 {
 	struct lock_list *entry;
 	/*
@@ -1415,6 +1411,13 @@  static inline int __bfs_backwards(struct
  * checking.
  */
 
+static void print_lock_trace(struct lock_trace *trace, unsigned int spaces)
+{
+	unsigned long *entries = stack_trace + trace->offset;
+
+	stack_trace_print(entries, trace->nr_entries, spaces);
+}
+
 /*
  * Print a dependency chain entry (this is only done when a deadlock
  * has been detected):
@@ -1427,8 +1430,7 @@  print_circular_bug_entry(struct lock_lis
 	printk("\n-> #%u", depth);
 	print_lock_name(target->class);
 	printk(KERN_CONT ":\n");
-	print_stack_trace(&target->trace, 6);
-
+	print_lock_trace(&target->trace, 6);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1740,7 +1742,7 @@  static void print_lock_class_header(stru
 
 			len += printk("%*s   %s", depth, "", usage_str[bit]);
 			len += printk(KERN_CONT " at:\n");
-			print_stack_trace(class->usage_traces + bit, len);
+			print_lock_trace(class->usage_traces + bit, len);
 		}
 	}
 	printk("%*s }\n", depth, "");
@@ -1765,7 +1767,7 @@  print_shortest_lock_dependencies(struct
 	do {
 		print_lock_class_header(entry->class, depth);
 		printk("%*s ... acquired at:\n", depth, "");
-		print_stack_trace(&entry->trace, 2);
+		print_lock_trace(&entry->trace, 2);
 		printk("\n");
 
 		if (depth == 0 && (entry != root)) {
@@ -1878,14 +1880,14 @@  print_bad_irq_dependency(struct task_str
 	print_lock_name(backwards_entry->class);
 	pr_warn("\n... which became %s-irq-safe at:\n", irqclass);
 
-	print_stack_trace(backwards_entry->class->usage_traces + bit1, 1);
+	print_lock_trace(backwards_entry->class->usage_traces + bit1, 1);
 
 	pr_warn("\nto a %s-irq-unsafe lock:\n", irqclass);
 	print_lock_name(forwards_entry->class);
 	pr_warn("\n... which became %s-irq-unsafe at:\n", irqclass);
 	pr_warn("...");
 
-	print_stack_trace(forwards_entry->class->usage_traces + bit2, 1);
+	print_lock_trace(forwards_entry->class->usage_traces + bit2, 1);
 
 	pr_warn("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\n");
 	print_irq_lock_scenario(backwards_entry, forwards_entry,
@@ -2161,9 +2163,9 @@  check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr,
 	       struct held_lock *next, int distance)
 {
 	struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry);
-	struct stack_trace trace;
 	struct lock_list *entry;
 	struct lock_list this;
+	struct lock_trace trace;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!hlock_class(prev)->key || !hlock_class(next)->key) {
@@ -2705,6 +2707,10 @@  static inline int validate_chain(struct
 {
 	return 1;
 }
+
+static void print_lock_trace(struct lock_trace *trace, unsigned int spaces)
+{
+}
 #endif
 
 /*
@@ -2801,7 +2807,7 @@  print_usage_bug(struct task_struct *curr
 	print_lock(this);
 
 	pr_warn("{%s} state was registered at:\n", usage_str[prev_bit]);
-	print_stack_trace(hlock_class(this)->usage_traces + prev_bit, 1);
+	print_lock_trace(hlock_class(this)->usage_traces + prev_bit, 1);
 
 	print_irqtrace_events(curr);
 	pr_warn("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n");