Message ID | 20191113102728.8835-1-jthumshirn@suse.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 2019/11/13 下午6:27, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > This series attempts to remove the BUG_ON()s in btrfs_close_one_device(). > Therefore some reorganization of btrfs_close_one_device() and > close_fs_devices() was needed. > > Forthermore a new BUG_ON() had to be temporarily introduced but is removed > again in the last patch of theis series. > > Although it is generally legal to return -ENOMEM on umount(2), the error > handling up until close_ctree() as neither close_ctree() nor btrfs_put_super() > would be able to handle the error. > > This series has passed fstests without any deviation from the baseline and > also the new error handling was tested via error injection using this snippet: > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > index 7c55169c0613..c58802c9c39c 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > @@ -1069,6 +1069,9 @@ static int btrfs_close_one_device(struct btrfs_device *device) > > new_device = btrfs_alloc_device(NULL, &device->devid, > device->uuid); > + btrfs_free_device(new_device); > + pr_err("%s() INJECTING -ENOMEM\n", __func__); > + new_device = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > if (IS_ERR(new_device)) > return PTR_ERR(new_device); > > Changes to v1: > > Fixed the decremt of btrfs_fs_devices::seeding. > > In addition to this, I've added two patches changing btrfs_fs_devices::seeding > and btrfs_fs_devices::rotating to bool, as they are in fact used as booleans. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Thanks, Qu > > Johannes Thumshirn (7): > btrfs: decrement number of open devices after closing the device not > before > btrfs: handle device allocation failure in btrfs_close_one_device() > btrfs: handle allocation failure in strdup > btrfs: handle error return of close_fs_devices() > btrfs: remove final BUG_ON() in close_fs_devices() > btrfs: change btrfs_fs_devices::seeing to bool > btrfs: change btrfs_fs_devices::rotating to bool > > fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 4 +-- > 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) >
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:27:21AM +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > This series attempts to remove the BUG_ON()s in btrfs_close_one_device(). > Therefore some reorganization of btrfs_close_one_device() and > close_fs_devices() was needed. > > Forthermore a new BUG_ON() had to be temporarily introduced but is removed > again in the last patch of theis series. > > Although it is generally legal to return -ENOMEM on umount(2), the error > handling up until close_ctree() as neither close_ctree() nor btrfs_put_super() > would be able to handle the error. > > This series has passed fstests without any deviation from the baseline and > also the new error handling was tested via error injection using this snippet: > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > index 7c55169c0613..c58802c9c39c 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > @@ -1069,6 +1069,9 @@ static int btrfs_close_one_device(struct btrfs_device *device) > > new_device = btrfs_alloc_device(NULL, &device->devid, > device->uuid); > + btrfs_free_device(new_device); > + pr_err("%s() INJECTING -ENOMEM\n", __func__); > + new_device = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > if (IS_ERR(new_device)) > return PTR_ERR(new_device); > > Changes to v1: > > Fixed the decremt of btrfs_fs_devices::seeding. > > In addition to this, I've added two patches changing btrfs_fs_devices::seeding > and btrfs_fs_devices::rotating to bool, as they are in fact used as booleans. > > Johannes Thumshirn (7): > btrfs: decrement number of open devices after closing the device not > before > btrfs: handle device allocation failure in btrfs_close_one_device() > btrfs: handle allocation failure in strdup > btrfs: handle error return of close_fs_devices() > btrfs: remove final BUG_ON() in close_fs_devices() > btrfs: change btrfs_fs_devices::seeing to bool > btrfs: change btrfs_fs_devices::rotating to bool I'll add the last 2 for now as they're obviously correct, the rest has some questions that I'd like to clarify before merging.
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index 7c55169c0613..c58802c9c39c 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -1069,6 +1069,9 @@ static int btrfs_close_one_device(struct btrfs_device *device) new_device = btrfs_alloc_device(NULL, &device->devid, device->uuid); + btrfs_free_device(new_device); + pr_err("%s() INJECTING -ENOMEM\n", __func__); + new_device = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); if (IS_ERR(new_device)) return PTR_ERR(new_device);