Message ID | 20200817135610.29338-1-marcos@mpdesouza.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | btrfs: block-group: Make read_block_group_item return void | expand |
On 17.08.20 г. 16:56 ч., Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote: > From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> > > Since it's inclusion on 9afc66498a0b > ("btrfs: block-group: refactor how we read one block group item") this > function always returned 0, so there is no need to check for the > returned value. > > Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:56:10AM -0300, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote: > From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> > > Since it's inclusion on 9afc66498a0b > ("btrfs: block-group: refactor how we read one block group item") this > function always returned 0, so there is no need to check for the > returned value. > > Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> Added to misc-next, thanks.
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c index 5b49e23e10d0..3891a1f731ba 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c @@ -1874,7 +1874,7 @@ static int check_chunk_block_group_mappings(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) return ret; } -static int read_block_group_item(struct btrfs_block_group *cache, +static void read_block_group_item(struct btrfs_block_group *cache, struct btrfs_path *path, const struct btrfs_key *key) { @@ -1888,8 +1888,6 @@ static int read_block_group_item(struct btrfs_block_group *cache, sizeof(bgi)); cache->used = btrfs_stack_block_group_used(&bgi); cache->flags = btrfs_stack_block_group_flags(&bgi); - - return 0; } static int read_one_block_group(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, @@ -1908,9 +1906,7 @@ static int read_one_block_group(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, if (!cache) return -ENOMEM; - ret = read_block_group_item(cache, path, key); - if (ret < 0) - goto error; + read_block_group_item(cache, path, key); if (need_clear) { /*