@@ -2799,9 +2799,7 @@ int btrfs_extract_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_bio *bbio,
{
u64 start = (u64)bbio->bio.bi_iter.bi_sector << SECTOR_SHIFT;
u64 len = bbio->bio.bi_iter.bi_size;
- struct btrfs_inode *inode = bbio->inode;
- u64 ordered_len = ordered->num_bytes;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
/* Must always be called for the beginning of an ordered extent. */
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(start != ordered->disk_bytenr))
@@ -2811,18 +2809,18 @@ int btrfs_extract_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_bio *bbio,
if (ordered->disk_num_bytes == len)
return 0;
- ret = btrfs_split_ordered_extent(ordered, len);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
/*
* Don't split the extent_map for NOCOW extents, as we're writing into
* a pre-existing one.
*/
- if (test_bit(BTRFS_ORDERED_NOCOW, &ordered->flags))
- return 0;
+ if (!test_bit(BTRFS_ORDERED_NOCOW, &ordered->flags)) {
+ ret = split_extent_map(bbio->inode, bbio->file_offset,
+ ordered->num_bytes, len);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
- return split_extent_map(inode, bbio->file_offset, ordered_len, len);
+ return btrfs_split_ordered_extent(ordered, len);
}
/*
There is no good reason for doing one before the other in terms of failure implications, but doing the extent_map split first will simplify some upcoming refactoring. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 18 ++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)