From patchwork Wed Oct 2 04:01:06 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Matthew Wilcox X-Patchwork-Id: 13819321 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1970482E4; Wed, 2 Oct 2024 04:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727841685; cv=none; b=LmZ1ZSjNgVxwViPrSRhN7Y7+gD8cnRiZin8H7j6Y84XqC1v6yalv265FiAKen85Fl1bbr/AzzdTl6cRwX6W1zbi0oliAKYah2SNM30kiiixjcUzO/dKvWkTweohEtF0RBhtZ8W4wZH9J+9BaA8MbYQE4aLBGRbq153e8UPGkRuc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727841685; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xjltzcWJmsieOqgwDm3VFkcpMNiWEZSPtgnpm74ni68=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=LXPKNsvlWq4ErwFcXv38SS3sak1X+k41Ynw28eMPnFf8lLPwy/EIoutQ0Eu/z48LVbhlggpuMLPXIQCLkOGUy/S+WnpdxelUiHmivqqO17w5mWhMRuAxJCYc1M8UcAiP1HyXjI5EPbe57uaWBC9+Jbi6tjEOXzV7zE2hFecxjXo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=u39QsFMw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="u39QsFMw" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=Qu1H+yLukYt9YwYC/7ESpsAw9sOZjKm/rhqgTzGdqoU=; b=u39QsFMwQ6tIwNI7i/W1K+/pl+ GvSGrpVMvi9IWupEj7d7hKdghJKrM8TW/XKgZb3bkO1NguUXTBhUJB4Adxa6WXd0ajYBIGzZWnxhW H6BXWSuGXsM65J4L5JDKfv0k8YLxibiMMitHwY03iC2W9MLIjhWBnRauq01lxHeU4qd9vVJI0B1z2 asy96gxHMxcFadkiQTWxzRThGNp0i2aIXcGqBT3UxcxELkkZdMroPgTKm4jlnqW1VhLmrZIv1VoQL n+44yDwp5sIhB3WaWM6c4Rg1vTpmuHvSuUmpVzYMZR7W8Jw/e9xFD9YUU3PZANOA6b2Uj9TjSqD3B 2GXU3Phg==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1svqY5-00000004I8Z-3vof; Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:01:13 +0000 From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" To: Christian Brauner Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: [PATCH 4/6] btrfs: Switch from using the private_2 flag to owner_2 Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 05:01:06 +0100 Message-ID: <20241002040111.1023018-5-willy@infradead.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.0 In-Reply-To: <20241002040111.1023018-1-willy@infradead.org> References: <20241002040111.1023018-1-willy@infradead.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 We are close to removing the private_2 flag, so switch btrfs to using owner_2 for its ordered flag. This is mostly used by buffer head filesystems, so btrfs can use it because it doesn't use buffer heads. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik --- fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 13 ++++--------- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 8 ++++---- fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h index 317a3712270f..307dedf95c70 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h @@ -744,16 +744,11 @@ const char *btrfs_super_csum_driver(u16 csum_type); size_t __attribute_const__ btrfs_get_num_csums(void); /* - * We use page status Private2 to indicate there is an ordered extent with + * We use folio flag owner_2 to indicate there is an ordered extent with * unfinished IO. - * - * Rename the Private2 accessors to Ordered, to improve readability. */ -#define PageOrdered(page) PagePrivate2(page) -#define SetPageOrdered(page) SetPagePrivate2(page) -#define ClearPageOrdered(page) ClearPagePrivate2(page) -#define folio_test_ordered(folio) folio_test_private_2(folio) -#define folio_set_ordered(folio) folio_set_private_2(folio) -#define folio_clear_ordered(folio) folio_clear_private_2(folio) +#define folio_test_ordered(folio) folio_test_owner_2(folio) +#define folio_set_ordered(folio) folio_set_owner_2(folio) +#define folio_clear_ordered(folio) folio_clear_owner_2(folio) #endif diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index edac499fd83d..a4055896261d 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -1513,7 +1513,7 @@ static noinline int cow_file_range(struct btrfs_inode *inode, * (which the caller expects to stay locked), don't clear any * dirty bits and don't set any writeback bits * - * Do set the Ordered (Private2) bit so we know this page was + * Do set the Ordered flag so we know this page was * properly setup for writepage. */ page_ops = (keep_locked ? 0 : PAGE_UNLOCK); @@ -7292,7 +7292,7 @@ static void btrfs_invalidate_folio(struct folio *folio, size_t offset, * * But already submitted bio can still be finished on this folio. * Furthermore, endio function won't skip folio which has Ordered - * (Private2) already cleared, so it's possible for endio and + * already cleared, so it's possible for endio and * invalidate_folio to do the same ordered extent accounting twice * on one folio. * @@ -7358,7 +7358,7 @@ static void btrfs_invalidate_folio(struct folio *folio, size_t offset, range_len = range_end + 1 - cur; if (!btrfs_folio_test_ordered(fs_info, folio, cur, range_len)) { /* - * If Ordered (Private2) is cleared, it means endio has + * If Ordered is cleared, it means endio has * already been executed for the range. * We can't delete the extent states as * btrfs_finish_ordered_io() may still use some of them. @@ -7431,7 +7431,7 @@ static void btrfs_invalidate_folio(struct folio *folio, size_t offset, } /* * We have iterated through all ordered extents of the page, the page - * should not have Ordered (Private2) anymore, or the above iteration + * should not have Ordered anymore, or the above iteration * did something wrong. */ ASSERT(!folio_test_ordered(folio)); diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c index 2104d60c2161..95c8499a159a 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c @@ -346,10 +346,10 @@ static bool can_finish_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered, ASSERT(file_offset + len <= folio_pos(folio) + folio_size(folio)); /* - * Ordered (Private2) bit indicates whether we still have + * Ordered flag indicates whether we still have * pending io unfinished for the ordered extent. * - * If there's no such bit, we need to skip to next range. + * If it's not set, we need to skip to next range. */ if (!btrfs_folio_test_ordered(fs_info, folio, file_offset, len)) return false;