Message ID | 363aee7827c9d6ff034b7e3ea2a5bf4959ff4905.1723046461.git.fdmanana@suse.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [for,5.15,stable] btrfs: fix double inode unlock for direct IO sync writes | expand |
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 04:27:33PM +0100, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote: > From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> > > commit e0391e92f9ab4fb3dbdeb139c967dcfa7ac4b115 upstream. > > If we do a direct IO sync write, at btrfs_sync_file(), and we need to skip > inode logging or we get an error starting a transaction or an error when > flushing delalloc, we end up unlocking the inode when we shouldn't under > the 'out_release_extents' label, and then unlock it again at > btrfs_direct_write(). > > Fix that by checking if we have to skip inode unlocking under that label. > > Reported-by: syzbot+7dbbb74af6291b5a5a8b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000dfd631061eaeb4bc@google.com/ > Fixes: 939b656bc8ab ("btrfs: fix corruption after buffer fault in during direct IO append write") > Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> > Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> > Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/file.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) All now queued up, thanks. greg k-h
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c index 7ca49c02e8f8..c44dfb4370d7 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c @@ -2433,7 +2433,10 @@ int btrfs_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync) out_release_extents: btrfs_release_log_ctx_extents(&ctx); - btrfs_inode_unlock(inode, BTRFS_ILOCK_MMAP); + if (skip_ilock) + up_write(&BTRFS_I(inode)->i_mmap_lock); + else + btrfs_inode_unlock(inode, BTRFS_ILOCK_MMAP); goto out; }