From patchwork Tue Aug 14 07:49:09 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Wang Sheng-Hui X-Patchwork-Id: 1318521 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-btrfs@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork1.kernel.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by patchwork1.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2CF83FC71 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755187Ab2HNHt1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 03:49:27 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:36390 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754905Ab2HNHt0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 03:49:26 -0400 Received: by yhmm54 with SMTP id m54so93198yhm.19 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:49:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rG9CXnCjPKl+TgnL/u1mr81A5U9kRfo5SVy+sODl0gE=; b=rI3C3jx0hnJTk5WnpE441ctlq+tUt5b+6SQe/0GcRepURoMBtZ4Akh357G5oylA3fJ slzVbAfDMmdzsGCM6iR5ks8uk3nDlz2iSbMwrCHLrwvjxdf/x8sGEeuvJkMCUg1vGjiz Xyh2b8ubkqVjg+257UDmXfn6vtl4VXTtdI6KWmKvHcR7oGOQIPKRAn7020keFSuE+kA7 LjzcDrx6HoHwQbOTheJ1+yCqysdLHuSB1zkW0PYEKkv2JzAki0ZKIvfS8++wWHjwJQB1 Mnalk2Y0YP2actlL0lzzYw2Qh4PbQbIaHbCCdMND4rU/IUk4sgRE1cfh2gmbQQ3FhJXn ZOdw== Received: by 10.68.226.102 with SMTP id rr6mr21440967pbc.99.1344930566040; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:49:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [9.115.120.146] ([202.108.130.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qx8sm568949pbc.63.2012.08.14.00.49.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:49:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <502A02F5.50909@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:49:09 +0800 From: Wang Sheng-Hui User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: chris.mason@fusionio.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: correct the comment for extent_io.c/clear_extent_bits Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org It should be "clear" instead of "set" for clear_extent_bits. Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui --- extent_io.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/extent_io.c b/extent_io.c index ebb35b2..638ee0e 100644 --- a/extent_io.c +++ b/extent_io.c @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static int clear_state_bit(struct extent_io_tree *tree, } /* - * set some bits on a range in the tree. + * clear some bits on a range in the tree. */ int clear_extent_bits(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start, u64 end, int bits, gfp_t mask)