@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static int parse_one_profile(const char *profile, u64 *flags)
static int parse_profiles(char *profiles, u64 *flags)
{
char *this_char;
- char *save_ptr;
+ char *save_ptr = NULL; /* Satisfy static checkers */
for (this_char = strtok_r(profiles, "|", &save_ptr);
this_char != NULL;
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static int parse_filters(char *filters, struct btrfs_balance_args *args)
{
char *this_char;
char *value;
- char *save_ptr;
+ char *save_ptr = NULL; /* Satisfy static checkers */
if (!filters)
return 0;
The coverity runs had a false positive complaining that save_ptr is uninitialized in the call to strtok_r. Turns out that under the covers glibc was doing enough to confuse the checker about what was being called. Just to keep the noise down, do a harmless initialization, with a comment as to why. Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> --- V3: Keep strtok_r for old compat, and just init the var. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html