Message ID | a7ba61de-3bbc-92fd-68db-2521f4bc8545@jp.fujitsu.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 05:02:45PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote: > Add btrfs test that checks "rmdir" or "rm -r" command can delete a > subvolume like an ordinary drectory. > > This behavior has been restricted long time but becomes allowed by > following patch in the kernel: > btrfs: Allow rmdir(2) to delete an empty subvolume > > Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Looks good to me, thanks! But still, I'd like to see a Reviewed-by tag from btrfs developers. Thanks, Eryu > --- > v1 -> v2 > - rebase to current master > - remove underscore from local function > - remove source common/btrfs > - remove unnecessary _filter_scratch and echo messages when fail > > As I will take a whole week vacation next week, my replay will be late. > Thanks, > Tomohiro Misono > > > tests/btrfs/160 | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/btrfs/160.out | 2 + > tests/btrfs/group | 1 + > 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/160 > create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/160.out > > diff --git a/tests/btrfs/160 b/tests/btrfs/160 > new file mode 100755 > index 00000000..86d2dca7 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/btrfs/160 > @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ > +#! /bin/bash > +# FS QA Test btrfs/159 > +# > +# QA test that checks rmdir(2) works for subvolumes like ordinary directories. > +# > +# This behavior has been restricted long time but becomes allowed by following > +# patch in the kernel: > +# btrfs: Allow rmdir(2) to delete an empty subvolume > +# > +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- > +# Copyright (c) 2018 Fujitsu. All Rights Reserved. > +# > +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as > +# published by the Free Software Foundation. > +# > +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, > +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > +# GNU General Public License for more details. > +# > +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation, > +# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA > +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- > +# > + > +seq=`basename $0` > +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq > +echo "QA output created by $seq" > + > +here=`pwd` > +tmp=/tmp/$$ > +status=1 # failure is the default! > +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 > + > +_cleanup() > +{ > + cd / > + rm -f $tmp.* > +} > + > +create_subvol() > +{ > + $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume create $1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 > +} > + > +create_snapshot() > +{ > + $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot $@ >> $seqres.full 2>&1 > +} > + > +rmdir_subvol() > +{ > + rmdir $1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 > +} > + > +rm_r_subvol() { > + rm -r $1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 > +} > + > +# get standard environment, filters and checks > +. ./common/rc > +. ./common/filter > + > +# remove previous $seqres.full before test > +rm -f $seqres.full > + > +# real QA test starts here > + > +# Modify as appropriate. > +_supported_fs btrfs > +_supported_os Linux > +_require_scratch > + > +_scratch_mkfs > /dev/null 2>&1 || _fail "mkfs failed" > +_scratch_mount > + > +# Check that an empty subvolume can be deleted by rmdir > +create_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub1 > +rmdir_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub1 || \ > + echo "rmdir should delete an empty subvolume" > + > +# Check that non-empty subvolume cannot be deleted by rmdir > +create_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub2 > +touch $SCRATCH_MNT/sub2/file > +rmdir_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub2 && \ > + echo "rmdir should fail for non-empty subvolume" > +rm $SCRATCH_MNT/sub2/file > +rmdir_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub2 || \ > + echo "rmdir should delete an empty subvolume" > + > +# Check that read-only empty subvolume can be deleted by rmdir > +create_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub3 > +create_snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT/sub3 $SCRATCH_MNT/snap > +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG property set $SCRATCH_MNT/sub3 ro true >> $seqres.full 2>&1 > +rmdir_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub3 || \ > + echo "rmdir should delete an empty subvolume" > +rmdir_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/snap || \ > + echo "rmdir should delete a readonly empty subvolume" > + > +# Check that the default subvolume cannot be deleted by rmdir > +create_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub4 > +subvolid=$(_btrfs_get_subvolid $SCRATCH_MNT sub4) > +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume set-default $subvolid $SCRATCH_MNT \ > + >> $seqres.full 2>&1 > +rmdir_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub4 && \ > + echo "rmdir should fail for the default subvolume" > + > +# Check that subvolume stub (created by snapshot) can be deleted by rmdir > +# (Note: this has been always allowed) > +create_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub5 > +create_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub5/sub6 > +create_snapshot $SCRATCH_MNT/sub5 $SCRATCH_MNT/snap2 > +rmdir $SCRATCH_MNT/snap2/sub6 || \ > + echo "rmdir should delete a subvolume stub (ino number == 2)" > + > +# Check that rm -r works for both non-snapshot subvolume and snapshot > +create_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub7 > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/sub7/dir > +create_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub7/dir/sub8 > +touch $SCRATCH_MNT/sub7/dir/sub8/file > + > +create_snapshot $SCRATCH_MNT/sub7 $SCRATCH_MNT/snap3 > +create_snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT/sub7 $SCRATCH_MNT/snap4 > + > +rm_r_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub7 || \ > + echo "rm -r should delete subvolumes recursively" > +rm_r_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/snap3 || \ > + echo "rm -r should delete subvolumes recursively" > +rm_r_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/snap4 && \ > + echo "rm -r should fail for non-empty readonly subvolume" > + > +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG property set $SCRATCH_MNT/snap4 ro false >> $seqres.full 2>&1 > +rm_r_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/snap4 || \ > + echo "rm -r should delete subvolumes recursively" > + > +# success, all done > +echo "Silence is golden" > +status=0 > +exit > diff --git a/tests/btrfs/160.out b/tests/btrfs/160.out > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..abad21f9 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/btrfs/160.out > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ > +QA output created by 160 > +Silence is golden > diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group > index ba766f6b..ff362dd2 100644 > --- a/tests/btrfs/group > +++ b/tests/btrfs/group > @@ -162,3 +162,4 @@ > 157 auto quick raid > 158 auto quick raid scrub > 159 auto quick > +160 auto quick subvol > -- > 2.14.3 > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 05:02:45PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote: > Add btrfs test that checks "rmdir" or "rm -r" command can delete a > subvolume like an ordinary drectory. > > This behavior has been restricted long time but becomes allowed by > following patch in the kernel: > btrfs: Allow rmdir(2) to delete an empty subvolume AFAICS this test will fail on older kernels, eg. stable versions, but this is not a bug that needs to be fixed by backporting patches. The usual way is to use the expunges, but as this is a feature coverage, I think the test should detect if the kernel has the feature at all. Similar to the fallocate modes etc. For the test itself, the scenarios look sufficient, so Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 06:26:35PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 05:02:45PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote: > > Add btrfs test that checks "rmdir" or "rm -r" command can delete a > > subvolume like an ordinary drectory. > > > > This behavior has been restricted long time but becomes allowed by > > following patch in the kernel: > > btrfs: Allow rmdir(2) to delete an empty subvolume > > AFAICS this test will fail on older kernels, eg. stable versions, but > this is not a bug that needs to be fixed by backporting patches. The > usual way is to use the expunges, but as this is a feature coverage, I > think the test should detect if the kernel has the feature at all. > Similar to the fallocate modes etc. Agreed, if the change is treated as a behavior change not a bug on old kernels, we probably need a way to detect the case and _notrun if kernel doesn't support it. > > For the test itself, the scenarios look sufficient, so > Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Thanks for the review! Eryu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/tests/btrfs/160 b/tests/btrfs/160 new file mode 100755 index 00000000..86d2dca7 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/btrfs/160 @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ +#! /bin/bash +# FS QA Test btrfs/159 +# +# QA test that checks rmdir(2) works for subvolumes like ordinary directories. +# +# This behavior has been restricted long time but becomes allowed by following +# patch in the kernel: +# btrfs: Allow rmdir(2) to delete an empty subvolume +# +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- +# Copyright (c) 2018 Fujitsu. All Rights Reserved. +# +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as +# published by the Free Software Foundation. +# +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the +# GNU General Public License for more details. +# +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation, +# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- +# + +seq=`basename $0` +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq +echo "QA output created by $seq" + +here=`pwd` +tmp=/tmp/$$ +status=1 # failure is the default! +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 + +_cleanup() +{ + cd / + rm -f $tmp.* +} + +create_subvol() +{ + $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume create $1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 +} + +create_snapshot() +{ + $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot $@ >> $seqres.full 2>&1 +} + +rmdir_subvol() +{ + rmdir $1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 +} + +rm_r_subvol() { + rm -r $1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 +} + +# get standard environment, filters and checks +. ./common/rc +. ./common/filter + +# remove previous $seqres.full before test +rm -f $seqres.full + +# real QA test starts here + +# Modify as appropriate. +_supported_fs btrfs +_supported_os Linux +_require_scratch + +_scratch_mkfs > /dev/null 2>&1 || _fail "mkfs failed" +_scratch_mount + +# Check that an empty subvolume can be deleted by rmdir +create_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub1 +rmdir_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub1 || \ + echo "rmdir should delete an empty subvolume" + +# Check that non-empty subvolume cannot be deleted by rmdir +create_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub2 +touch $SCRATCH_MNT/sub2/file +rmdir_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub2 && \ + echo "rmdir should fail for non-empty subvolume" +rm $SCRATCH_MNT/sub2/file +rmdir_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub2 || \ + echo "rmdir should delete an empty subvolume" + +# Check that read-only empty subvolume can be deleted by rmdir +create_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub3 +create_snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT/sub3 $SCRATCH_MNT/snap +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG property set $SCRATCH_MNT/sub3 ro true >> $seqres.full 2>&1 +rmdir_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub3 || \ + echo "rmdir should delete an empty subvolume" +rmdir_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/snap || \ + echo "rmdir should delete a readonly empty subvolume" + +# Check that the default subvolume cannot be deleted by rmdir +create_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub4 +subvolid=$(_btrfs_get_subvolid $SCRATCH_MNT sub4) +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume set-default $subvolid $SCRATCH_MNT \ + >> $seqres.full 2>&1 +rmdir_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub4 && \ + echo "rmdir should fail for the default subvolume" + +# Check that subvolume stub (created by snapshot) can be deleted by rmdir +# (Note: this has been always allowed) +create_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub5 +create_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub5/sub6 +create_snapshot $SCRATCH_MNT/sub5 $SCRATCH_MNT/snap2 +rmdir $SCRATCH_MNT/snap2/sub6 || \ + echo "rmdir should delete a subvolume stub (ino number == 2)" + +# Check that rm -r works for both non-snapshot subvolume and snapshot +create_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub7 +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/sub7/dir +create_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub7/dir/sub8 +touch $SCRATCH_MNT/sub7/dir/sub8/file + +create_snapshot $SCRATCH_MNT/sub7 $SCRATCH_MNT/snap3 +create_snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT/sub7 $SCRATCH_MNT/snap4 + +rm_r_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/sub7 || \ + echo "rm -r should delete subvolumes recursively" +rm_r_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/snap3 || \ + echo "rm -r should delete subvolumes recursively" +rm_r_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/snap4 && \ + echo "rm -r should fail for non-empty readonly subvolume" + +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG property set $SCRATCH_MNT/snap4 ro false >> $seqres.full 2>&1 +rm_r_subvol $SCRATCH_MNT/snap4 || \ + echo "rm -r should delete subvolumes recursively" + +# success, all done +echo "Silence is golden" +status=0 +exit diff --git a/tests/btrfs/160.out b/tests/btrfs/160.out new file mode 100644 index 00000000..abad21f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/btrfs/160.out @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +QA output created by 160 +Silence is golden diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group index ba766f6b..ff362dd2 100644 --- a/tests/btrfs/group +++ b/tests/btrfs/group @@ -162,3 +162,4 @@ 157 auto quick raid 158 auto quick raid scrub 159 auto quick +160 auto quick subvol
Add btrfs test that checks "rmdir" or "rm -r" command can delete a subvolume like an ordinary drectory. This behavior has been restricted long time but becomes allowed by following patch in the kernel: btrfs: Allow rmdir(2) to delete an empty subvolume Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> --- v1 -> v2 - rebase to current master - remove underscore from local function - remove source common/btrfs - remove unnecessary _filter_scratch and echo messages when fail As I will take a whole week vacation next week, my replay will be late. Thanks, Tomohiro Misono tests/btrfs/160 | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tests/btrfs/160.out | 2 + tests/btrfs/group | 1 + 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+) create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/160 create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/160.out