From patchwork Tue Mar 2 15:04:45 2010 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tero Roponen X-Patchwork-Id: 83192 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by demeter.kernel.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o22F4HwR019888 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:04:18 GMT Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753935Ab0CBPD4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:03:56 -0500 Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:43432 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753833Ab0CBPDz (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:03:55 -0500 Received: by wya21 with SMTP id 21so179770wya.19 for ; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:03:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:x-x-sender:to:cc :subject:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=1yy4f7EV/0hE9Tby2jewg1Xl6exZwYlaY7v48JwWbHs=; b=REtdXEymyQZ+IdcPxbXDF6eNd5W9SE38WCwDuELUM7lFc1O3on97KP5+MzxV0zh2O5 yf8VOty8dDFacKkgGJhr/HWocfJsJsMNNtkWc/RObQJQnkjh01/Y11FB/VfKnv4y/zHW XwV+aPXFT6/acMlED9QE7mRKJ9W8zuFR3vyRE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; b=INtIRDls3P5p1oXOqJA4TrPoaUvpmevtCVqyt4GfGpyO+Xd2w3/iDqpD2Iop0MkT0i N88J433+CBq1p6znFUu6dzp8rh3bmBPD+/q67Gi7UEs0kjriT56+CKEskY8Cm2JVKIln LInVzCBF8f7202AfkMlciNc95qsbg8rgrZDrE= Received: by 10.216.161.196 with SMTP id w46mr2097376wek.105.1267542232829; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:03:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from terrop (dsl-jklbrasgw1-fecbdf00-152.dhcp.inet.fi [80.223.203.152]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm9629450eyh.11.2010.03.02.07.03.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:03:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 17:04:45 +0200 (EET) From: Tero Roponen X-X-Sender: terrop@terrop To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org cc: chris.mason@oracle.com, josef@redhat.com Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: make a definition of a flag more consistent Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (demeter.kernel.org [140.211.167.41]); Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:04:18 +0000 (UTC) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h index 1166b15..083e10c 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ struct btrfs_super_block { * ones specified below then we will fail to mount */ #define BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MIXED_BACKREF (1ULL << 0) -#define BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_DEFAULT_SUBVOL (2ULL << 0) +#define BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_DEFAULT_SUBVOL (1ULL << 1) #define BTRFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_SUPP 0ULL #define BTRFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_RO_SUPP 0ULL