Message ID | cb2e56cec569be6600b2a159f8ecf98907ad87e6.1736418116.git.dsterba@suse.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Random cleanups for 6.14 | expand |
On 09.01.25 11:27, David Sterba wrote: > Drop the underscores as the naming scheme does not apply here and to > have the unlock for parity with lock_delalloc_folios(). That sentence somehow doesn't sound good in my head, maybe Drop the leading underscores in '__unlock_for_delalloc()' and rename it to 'unlock_delalloc_folio()'. This also ensures naming parity with 'lock_delalloc_folios()'.
On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 12:07:43PM +0000, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On 09.01.25 11:27, David Sterba wrote: > > Drop the underscores as the naming scheme does not apply here and to > > have the unlock for parity with lock_delalloc_folios(). > > That sentence somehow doesn't sound good in my head, maybe > > Drop the leading underscores in '__unlock_for_delalloc()' and rename it > to 'unlock_delalloc_folio()'. This also ensures naming parity with > 'lock_delalloc_folios()'. Right, I'll use that wording, thanks.
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index 9725ff7f274d..8c472560e43e 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static void __process_folios_contig(struct address_space *mapping, } } -static noinline void __unlock_for_delalloc(const struct inode *inode, +static noinline void unlock_delalloc_folio(const struct inode *inode, const struct folio *locked_folio, u64 start, u64 end) { @@ -288,8 +288,7 @@ static noinline int lock_delalloc_folios(struct inode *inode, out: folio_batch_release(&fbatch); if (processed_end > start) - __unlock_for_delalloc(inode, locked_folio, start, - processed_end); + unlock_delalloc_folio(inode, locked_folio, start, processed_end); return -EAGAIN; } @@ -390,7 +389,7 @@ noinline_for_stack bool find_lock_delalloc_range(struct inode *inode, unlock_extent(tree, delalloc_start, delalloc_end, &cached_state); if (!ret) { - __unlock_for_delalloc(inode, locked_folio, delalloc_start, + unlock_delalloc_folio(inode, locked_folio, delalloc_start, delalloc_end); cond_resched(); goto again; @@ -1247,7 +1246,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack int writepage_delalloc(struct btrfs_inode *inode, */ unlock_extent(&inode->io_tree, found_start, found_start + found_len - 1, NULL); - __unlock_for_delalloc(&inode->vfs_inode, folio, + unlock_delalloc_folio(&inode->vfs_inode, folio, found_start, found_start + found_len - 1); }
Drop the underscores as the naming scheme does not apply here and to have the unlock for parity with lock_delalloc_folios(). Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> --- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)