From patchwork Thu Feb 29 11:56:21 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Filipe Manana X-Patchwork-Id: 13577024 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DA6F7CF16 for ; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709207787; cv=none; b=IIXSBI89e1gvTYZiby7/8Cp3T8oIGxzc2axkAsVQD1n8fLOoIpG163scVkaqKrCA8UeiCV3n4VK7ugNYEFnIzcicQi6Ng8mdhEIYI9OT1qdQWWx83CJb+3/VWzaOGP//lTOpzVo4vl1T1OzkmTa1IveaEjEsVbDq6bUZ31Qi940= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709207787; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iGwkuavtu4ef/GJjzoWyDet9ln+oGHe5PasTzFTiTis=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=svS1PuOy2GpHiE2KDUNlDSELwFT8xBJg6p07cOZ9oy2a+MQ/QlBdyw5Degku0S0krQjj0pz+tFfpP6Cilo3DxGsGWBxr7Vq0KWFTeIoQ0VcE+nd1vFPgWFaYYo0z6/cdtL4TWTP0KDz/dt3q7T5r3G78ot2mlJkyABKFZusYh4A= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IgrGGZMM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IgrGGZMM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 740F1C43390 for ; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:56:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1709207787; bh=iGwkuavtu4ef/GJjzoWyDet9ln+oGHe5PasTzFTiTis=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IgrGGZMMH6sIxbfH7hjXWzppRkrd8vMA36SyTgCeQhqv462SxW/aUetW5f5T5VY9W MaIsVGf4DcdOeVl6gzwMMh6AXga2JKvw120pATC/mFyOGXemurblLhPzeONsB7+Ijq PpHVMAoGEsH5y1/Gz8vmNTxxU00aY/8reJQ85FIU9epwwQDpvWGs6nQGEgOD0FWOFc kanMn3D7oTDYgcl7UiR6Y6b6JTow9RWHCSwNSashDGilcTVXqpniRH40lLfxHmNPqe b3B+LoUyFFHBRY0xSboN6q/8Ay96Nb/TkK49q7SqZUpmQOouOoAIaVlTShceRk3VeD pz5Eb0T+bv+KQ== From: fdmanana@kernel.org To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: fix race when detecting delalloc ranges during fiemap Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:56:21 +0000 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Filipe Manana For fiemap we recently stopped locking the target extent range for the whole duration of the fiemap call, in order to avoid a deadlock in a scenario where the fiemap buffer happens to be a memory mapped range of the same file. This use case is very unlikely to be useful in practice but it may be triggered by fuzz testing (syzbot, etc). This however introduced a race that makes us miss delalloc ranges for file regions that are currently holes, so the caller of fiemap will not be aware that there's data for some file regions. This can be quite serious for some use cases - for example in coreutils versions before 9.0, the cp program used fiemap to detect holes and data in the source file, copying only regions with data (extents or delalloc) from the source file to the destination file in order to preserve holes (see the documentation for its --sparse command line option). This means that if cp was used with a source file that had delalloc in a hole, the destination file could end up without that data, which is effectively a data loss issue, if it happened to hit the race described below. The race happens like this: 1) Fiemap is called, without the FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC flag, for a file that has delalloc in the file range [64M, 65M[, which is currently a hole; 2) Fiemap locks the inode in shared mode, then starts iterating the inode's subvolume tree searching for file extent items, without having the whole fiemap target range locked in the inode's io tree - the change introduced recently by commit b0ad381fa769 ("btrfs: fix deadlock with fiemap and extent locking"). It only locks ranges in the io tree when it finds a hole or prealloc extent since that commit; 3) Note that fiemap clones each leaf before using it, and this is to avoid deadlocks when locking a file range in the inode's io tree and the fiemap buffer is memory mapped to some file, because writing to the page with btrfs_page_mkwrite() will wait on any ordered extent for the page's range and the ordered extent needs to lock the range and may need to modify the same leaf, therefore leading to a deadlock on the leaf; 4) While iterating the file extent items in the cloned leaf before finding the hole in the range [64M, 65M[, the delalloc in that range is flushed and its ordered extent completes - meaning the corresponding file extent item is in the inode's subvolume tree, but not present in the cloned leaf that fiemap is iterating over; 5) When fiemap finds the hole in the [64M, 65M[ range by seeing the gap in the cloned leaf (or a file extent item with disk_bytenr == 0 in case the NO_HOLES feature is not enabled), it will lock that file range in the inode's io tree and then search for delalloc by checking for the EXTENT_DELALLOC bit in the io tree for that range and ordered extents (with btrfs_find_delalloc_in_range()). But it finds nothing since the delalloc in that range was already flushed and the ordered extent completed and is gone - as a result fiemap will not report that there's delalloc or an extent for the range [64M, 65M[, so user space will be mislead into thinking that there's a hole in that range. This could actually be sporadically triggered with test case generic/094 from fstests, which reports a missing extent/delalloc range like this: generic/094 2s ... - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/094.out.bad) --- tests/generic/094.out 2020-06-10 19:29:03.830519425 +0100 +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/094.out.bad 2024-02-28 11:00:00.381071525 +0000 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ QA output created by 094 fiemap run with sync fiemap run without sync +ERROR: couldn't find extent at 7 +map is 'HHDDHPPDPHPH' +logical: [ 5.. 6] phys: 301517.. 301518 flags: 0x800 tot: 2 +logical: [ 8.. 8] phys: 301520.. 301520 flags: 0x800 tot: 1 ... (Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/generic/094.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/094.out.bad' to see the entire diff) So in order to fix this, while still avoiding deadlocks in the case where the fiemap buffer is memory mapped to the same file, change fiemap to work like the following: 1) Always lock the whole range in the inode's io tree before starting to iterate the inode's subvolume tree searching for file extent items, just like we did before commit b0ad381fa769 ("btrfs: fix deadlock with fiemap and extent locking"); 2) Now instead of writing to the fiemap buffer everytime we have an extent to report, write instead to a temporary buffer (1 page), and when that buffer becomes full, stop iterating the file extent items, unlock the range in the io tree, release the search path, submit all the entries kept in that buffer to the fiemap buffer, and then resume the search for file extent items after locking again the remainder of the range in the io tree. The buffer having a size of a page, allows for 146 entries in a system with 4K pages. This is a large enough value to have a good performance by avoiding too many restarts of the search for file extent items. In other words this preserves the huge performance gains made in the last two years to fiemap, while avoiding the deadlocks in case the fiemap buffer is memory mapped to the same file (useless in practice, but possible and exercised by fuzz testing and syzbot). Fixes: b0ad381fa769 ("btrfs: fix deadlock with fiemap and extent locking") Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana --- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 221 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 160 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index 65e4c8fc89b1..e7cfffc4e7b5 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -2451,12 +2451,65 @@ int try_release_extent_mapping(struct page *page, gfp_t mask) return try_release_extent_state(tree, page, mask); } +struct btrfs_fiemap_entry { + u64 offset; + u64 phys; + u64 len; + u32 flags; +}; + /* - * To cache previous fiemap extent + * Indicate the caller of emit_fiemap_extent() that it needs to unlock the file + * range from the inode's io tree, unlock the subvolume tree search path, flush + * the fiemap cache and relock the file range and research the subvolume tree. + * The value here is something negative that can't be confused with a valid + * errno value and different from 1 because that's also a return value from + * fiemap_fill_next_extent() and also it's often used to mean some btree search + * did not find a key, so make it some distinct negative value. + */ +#define BTRFS_FIEMAP_FLUSH_CACHE (-(MAX_ERRNO + 1)) + +/* + * Used to: + * + * - Cache the next entry to be emitted to the fiemap buffer, so that we can + * merge extents that are contiguous and can be grouped as a single one; * - * Will be used for merging fiemap extent + * - Store extents ready to be written to the fiemap buffer in an intermediary + * buffer. This intermediary buffer is to ensure that in case the fiemap + * buffer is memory mapped to the fiemap target file, we don't deadlock + * during btrfs_page_mkwrite(). This is because during fiemap we are locking + * an extent range in order to prevent races with delalloc flushing and + * ordered extent completion, which is needed in order to reliably detect + * delalloc in holes and prealloc extents. And this can lead to a deadlock + * if the fiemap buffer is memory mapped to the file we are running fiemap + * against (a silly, useless in practice scenario, but possible) because + * btrfs_page_mkwrite() will try to lock the same extent range. */ struct fiemap_cache { + /* An array of ready fiemap entries. */ + struct btrfs_fiemap_entry *entries; + /* Number of entries in the entries array. */ + int entries_size; + /* Index of the next entry in the entries array to write to. */ + int entries_pos; + /* + * Once the entries array is full, this indicates what's the offset for + * the next file extent item we must search for in the inode's subvolume + * tree after unlocking the extent range in the inode's io tree and + * releasing the search path. + */ + u64 next_search_offset; + /* + * This matches struct fiemap_extent_info::fi_mapped_extents, we use it + * to count ourselves emitted extents and stop instead of relying on + * fiemap_fill_next_extent() because we buffer ready fiemap entries at + * the @entries array, and we want to stop as soon as we hit the max + * amount of extents to map, not just to save time but also to make the + * logic at extent_fiemap() simpler. + */ + unsigned int extents_mapped; + /* Fields for the cached extent (unsubmitted, not ready, extent). */ u64 offset; u64 phys; u64 len; @@ -2464,6 +2517,28 @@ struct fiemap_cache { bool cached; }; +static int flush_fiemap_cache(struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, + struct fiemap_cache *cache) +{ + for (int i = 0; i < cache->entries_pos; i++) { + struct btrfs_fiemap_entry *entry = &cache->entries[i]; + int ret; + + ret = fiemap_fill_next_extent(fieinfo, entry->offset, + entry->phys, entry->len, + entry->flags); + /* + * Ignore 1 (reached max entries) because we keep track of that + * ourselves in emit_fiemap_extent(). + */ + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + } + cache->entries_pos = 0; + + return 0; +} + /* * Helper to submit fiemap extent. * @@ -2478,8 +2553,8 @@ static int emit_fiemap_extent(struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, struct fiemap_cache *cache, u64 offset, u64 phys, u64 len, u32 flags) { + struct btrfs_fiemap_entry *entry; u64 cache_end; - int ret = 0; /* Set at the end of extent_fiemap(). */ ASSERT((flags & FIEMAP_EXTENT_LAST) == 0); @@ -2492,7 +2567,9 @@ static int emit_fiemap_extent(struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, * find an extent that starts at an offset behind the end offset of the * previous extent we processed. This happens if fiemap is called * without FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC and there are ordered extents completing - * while we call btrfs_next_leaf() (through fiemap_next_leaf_item()). + * after we had to unlock the file range, release the search path, emit + * the fiemap extents stored in the buffer (cache->entries array) and + * the lock the remainder of the range and re-search the btree. * * For example we are in leaf X processing its last item, which is the * file extent item for file range [512K, 1M[, and after @@ -2605,11 +2682,35 @@ static int emit_fiemap_extent(struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, emit: /* Not mergeable, need to submit cached one */ - ret = fiemap_fill_next_extent(fieinfo, cache->offset, cache->phys, - cache->len, cache->flags); - cache->cached = false; - if (ret) - return ret; + + if (cache->entries_pos == cache->entries_size) { + /* + * We will need to research for the end offset of the last + * stored extent and not from the current offset, because after + * unlocking the range and releasing the path, if there's a hole + * between that end offset and this current offset, a new extent + * may have been inserted due to a new write, so we don't want + * to miss it. + */ + entry = &cache->entries[cache->entries_size - 1]; + cache->next_search_offset = entry->offset + entry->len; + cache->cached = false; + + return BTRFS_FIEMAP_FLUSH_CACHE; + } + + entry = &cache->entries[cache->entries_pos]; + entry->offset = cache->offset; + entry->phys = cache->phys; + entry->len = cache->len; + entry->flags = cache->flags; + cache->entries_pos++; + cache->extents_mapped++; + + if (cache->extents_mapped == fieinfo->fi_extents_max) { + cache->cached = false; + return 1; + } assign: cache->cached = true; cache->offset = offset; @@ -2735,8 +2836,8 @@ static int fiemap_search_slot(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct btrfs_path *path * neighbour leaf). * We also need the private clone because holding a read lock on an * extent buffer of the subvolume's b+tree will make lockdep unhappy - * when we call fiemap_fill_next_extent(), because that may cause a page - * fault when filling the user space buffer with fiemap data. + * when we check if extents are shared, as backref walking may need to + * lock the same leaf we are processing. */ clone = btrfs_clone_extent_buffer(path->nodes[0]); if (!clone) @@ -2776,34 +2877,16 @@ static int fiemap_process_hole(struct btrfs_inode *inode, * it beyond i_size. */ while (cur_offset < end && cur_offset < i_size) { - struct extent_state *cached_state = NULL; u64 delalloc_start; u64 delalloc_end; u64 prealloc_start; - u64 lockstart; - u64 lockend; u64 prealloc_len = 0; bool delalloc; - lockstart = round_down(cur_offset, inode->root->fs_info->sectorsize); - lockend = round_up(end, inode->root->fs_info->sectorsize); - - /* - * We are only locking for the delalloc range because that's the - * only thing that can change here. With fiemap we have a lock - * on the inode, so no buffered or direct writes can happen. - * - * However mmaps and normal page writeback will cause this to - * change arbitrarily. We have to lock the extent lock here to - * make sure that nobody messes with the tree while we're doing - * btrfs_find_delalloc_in_range. - */ - lock_extent(&inode->io_tree, lockstart, lockend, &cached_state); delalloc = btrfs_find_delalloc_in_range(inode, cur_offset, end, delalloc_cached_state, &delalloc_start, &delalloc_end); - unlock_extent(&inode->io_tree, lockstart, lockend, &cached_state); if (!delalloc) break; @@ -2971,6 +3054,7 @@ int extent_fiemap(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, u64 start, u64 len) { const u64 ino = btrfs_ino(inode); + struct extent_state *cached_state = NULL; struct extent_state *delalloc_cached_state = NULL; struct btrfs_path *path; struct fiemap_cache cache = { 0 }; @@ -2983,26 +3067,33 @@ int extent_fiemap(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, bool stopped = false; int ret; + cache.entries_size = PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct btrfs_fiemap_entry); + cache.entries = kmalloc_array(cache.entries_size, + sizeof(struct btrfs_fiemap_entry), + GFP_KERNEL); backref_ctx = btrfs_alloc_backref_share_check_ctx(); path = btrfs_alloc_path(); - if (!backref_ctx || !path) { + if (!cache.entries || !backref_ctx || !path) { ret = -ENOMEM; goto out; } +restart: range_start = round_down(start, sectorsize); range_end = round_up(start + len, sectorsize); prev_extent_end = range_start; + lock_extent(&inode->io_tree, range_start, range_end, &cached_state); + ret = fiemap_find_last_extent_offset(inode, path, &last_extent_end); if (ret < 0) - goto out; + goto out_unlock; btrfs_release_path(path); path->reada = READA_FORWARD; ret = fiemap_search_slot(inode, path, range_start); if (ret < 0) { - goto out; + goto out_unlock; } else if (ret > 0) { /* * No file extent item found, but we may have delalloc between @@ -3049,7 +3140,7 @@ int extent_fiemap(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, backref_ctx, 0, 0, 0, prev_extent_end, hole_end); if (ret < 0) { - goto out; + goto out_unlock; } else if (ret > 0) { /* fiemap_fill_next_extent() told us to stop. */ stopped = true; @@ -3105,7 +3196,7 @@ int extent_fiemap(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, extent_gen, backref_ctx); if (ret < 0) - goto out; + goto out_unlock; else if (ret > 0) flags |= FIEMAP_EXTENT_SHARED; } @@ -3116,9 +3207,9 @@ int extent_fiemap(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, } if (ret < 0) { - goto out; + goto out_unlock; } else if (ret > 0) { - /* fiemap_fill_next_extent() told us to stop. */ + /* emit_fiemap_extent() told us to stop. */ stopped = true; break; } @@ -3127,12 +3218,12 @@ int extent_fiemap(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, next_item: if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) { ret = -EINTR; - goto out; + goto out_unlock; } ret = fiemap_next_leaf_item(inode, path); if (ret < 0) { - goto out; + goto out_unlock; } else if (ret > 0) { /* No more file extent items for this inode. */ break; @@ -3141,22 +3232,12 @@ int extent_fiemap(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, } check_eof_delalloc: - /* - * Release (and free) the path before emitting any final entries to - * fiemap_fill_next_extent() to keep lockdep happy. This is because - * once we find no more file extent items exist, we may have a - * non-cloned leaf, and fiemap_fill_next_extent() can trigger page - * faults when copying data to the user space buffer. - */ - btrfs_free_path(path); - path = NULL; - if (!stopped && prev_extent_end < range_end) { ret = fiemap_process_hole(inode, fieinfo, &cache, &delalloc_cached_state, backref_ctx, 0, 0, 0, prev_extent_end, range_end - 1); if (ret < 0) - goto out; + goto out_unlock; prev_extent_end = range_end; } @@ -3164,28 +3245,16 @@ int extent_fiemap(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, const u64 i_size = i_size_read(&inode->vfs_inode); if (prev_extent_end < i_size) { - struct extent_state *cached_state = NULL; u64 delalloc_start; u64 delalloc_end; - u64 lockstart; - u64 lockend; bool delalloc; - lockstart = round_down(prev_extent_end, sectorsize); - lockend = round_up(i_size, sectorsize); - - /* - * See the comment in fiemap_process_hole as to why - * we're doing the locking here. - */ - lock_extent(&inode->io_tree, lockstart, lockend, &cached_state); delalloc = btrfs_find_delalloc_in_range(inode, prev_extent_end, i_size - 1, &delalloc_cached_state, &delalloc_start, &delalloc_end); - unlock_extent(&inode->io_tree, lockstart, lockend, &cached_state); if (!delalloc) cache.flags |= FIEMAP_EXTENT_LAST; } else { @@ -3193,9 +3262,39 @@ int extent_fiemap(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, } } +out_unlock: + unlock_extent(&inode->io_tree, range_start, range_end, &cached_state); + + if (ret == BTRFS_FIEMAP_FLUSH_CACHE) { + btrfs_release_path(path); + ret = flush_fiemap_cache(fieinfo, &cache); + if (ret) + goto out; + len -= cache.next_search_offset - start; + start = cache.next_search_offset; + goto restart; + } else if (ret < 0) { + goto out; + } + + /* + * Must free the path before emitting to the fiemap buffer because we + * may have a non-cloned leaf and if the fiemap buffer is memory mapped + * to a file, a write into it (through btrfs_page_mkwrite()) may trigger + * waiting for an ordered extent that in order to complete needs to + * modify that leaf, therefore leading to a deadlock. + */ + btrfs_free_path(path); + path = NULL; + + ret = flush_fiemap_cache(fieinfo, &cache); + if (ret) + goto out; + ret = emit_last_fiemap_cache(fieinfo, &cache); out: free_extent_state(delalloc_cached_state); + kfree(cache.entries); btrfs_free_backref_share_ctx(backref_ctx); btrfs_free_path(path); return ret;