Message ID | cover.1617020713.git.matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Support ROHM BD71815 PMIC | expand |
On Mon, 2021-03-29 at 15:52 +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > Patch series introducing support for ROHM BD71815 PMIC > > ROHM BD71815 is a power management IC used in some battery powered > systems. It contains regulators, GPO(s), charger + coulomb counter, > RTC > and a clock gate. Lee, Mark, (Linus, Bartosz, all) I think all other parts except the regulator have relevant acks. (Well, I changed GPIO in last version so Bart/Linus may want changes but those will follow to GPIO in near future anyways). Do you think Lee could merge other but the regulator parts to MFD if Mark is busy? I'd like to be able to squeeze the amount of patches and recipients for future iterations. It might be easier to work directly on regulator tree if regulator part gets delayed to next cycle. (I do also plan further working with the GPIO part during 5.13-rc cycle to utilize the regmap_gpio. That could be done in the GPIO tree then). I think the other portions are in a pretty stable shape now. Best Regards Matti Vaittinen
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:06:53AM +0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote: > Do you think Lee could merge other but the regulator parts to MFD if > Mark is busy? I'd like to be able to squeeze the amount of patches and > recipients for future iterations. It might be easier to work directly > on regulator tree if regulator part gets delayed to next cycle. (I do > also plan further working with the GPIO part during 5.13-rc cycle to > utilize the regmap_gpio. That could be done in the GPIO tree then). I > think the other portions are in a pretty stable shape now. This wouldn't be a bad idea in general for these serieses, especially the bigger ones or the ones that get a lot of review comments on some patches. In any case, here's a pull request for the helpers that are added The following changes since commit 0d02ec6b3136c73c09e7859f0d0e4e2c4c07b49b: Linux 5.12-rc4 (2021-03-21 14:56:43 -0700) are available in the Git repository at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git tags/regulator-list-ramp-helpers for you to fetch changes up to fb8fee9efdcf084d9e31ba14cc4734d97e5dd972: regulator: Add regmap helper for ramp-delay setting (2021-04-02 18:33:59 +0100) ---------------------------------------------------------------- regulator: Add a new helper and export an existing one For new drivers. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Matti Vaittinen (2): regulator: helpers: Export helper voltage listing regulator: Add regmap helper for ramp-delay setting drivers/regulator/helpers.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- include/linux/regulator/driver.h | 7 +++ 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 15:52:38 +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > Patch series introducing support for ROHM BD71815 PMIC > > ROHM BD71815 is a power management IC used in some battery powered > systems. It contains regulators, GPO(s), charger + coulomb counter, RTC > and a clock gate. > > All regulators can be controlled via I2C. LDO4 can additionally be set to > be enabled/disabled by a GPIO. LDO3 voltage could be selected from two > voltages written into separate VSEL reisters using GPIO but this mode is > not supported by driver. On top of that the PMIC has the typical HW > state machine which is present also on many other ROHM PMICs. > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next Thanks! [10/19] regulator: helpers: Export helper voltage listing commit: e3baacf54275647a018ee35bff3bc775a8a2a01a [13/19] regulator: Add regmap helper for ramp-delay setting commit: fb8fee9efdcf084d9e31ba14cc4734d97e5dd972 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
On Fri, 2021-04-02 at 20:19 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:06:53AM +0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote: > > > Do you think Lee could merge other but the regulator parts to MFD > > if > > Mark is busy? I'd like to be able to squeeze the amount of patches > > and > > recipients for future iterations. It might be easier to work > > directly > > on regulator tree if regulator part gets delayed to next cycle. (I > > do > > also plan further working with the GPIO part during 5.13-rc cycle > > to > > utilize the regmap_gpio. That could be done in the GPIO tree then). > > I > > think the other portions are in a pretty stable shape now. > > This wouldn't be a bad idea in general for these serieses, especially > the bigger ones or the ones that get a lot of review comments on some > patches. > > In any case, here's a pull request for the helpers that are added Thanks Mark. > Matti Vaittinen (2): > regulator: helpers: Export helper voltage listing > regulator: Add regmap helper for ramp-delay setting > If I understand this correctly, the idea is that Lee could pull these changes to his tree? So, I will drop these two patches from the series when I resend it. Helpers are needed for the regulator part of the series to apply. Lee, Mark, please let me know if I misunderstood. Best Regards Matti Vaittinen
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 05:23:41AM +0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote: > On Fri, 2021-04-02 at 20:19 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > Matti Vaittinen (2): > > regulator: helpers: Export helper voltage listing > > regulator: Add regmap helper for ramp-delay setting > If I understand this correctly, the idea is that Lee could pull these > changes to his tree? So, I will drop these two patches from the series > when I resend it. Helpers are needed for the regulator part of the > series to apply. Lee, Mark, please let me know if I misunderstood. Yes.