diff mbox

clk: scpi: don't add cpufreq device if the scpi dvfs node is disabled

Message ID 1483706070-12357-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Delegated to: Stephen Boyd
Headers show

Commit Message

Sudeep Holla Jan. 6, 2017, 12:34 p.m. UTC
Currently we add the virtual cpufreq device unconditionally even when
the SCPI DVFS clock provider node is disabled. This will cause cpufreq
driver to throw errors when it gets initailised on boot/modprobe and
also when the CPUs are hot-plugged back in.

This patch fixes the issue by adding the virtual cpufreq device only if
the SCPI DVFS clock provider is available and registered.

Fixes: 9490f01e2471 ("clk: scpi: add support for cpufreq virtual device")
Reported-by: Michał Zegan <webczat_200@poczta.onet.pl>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
 drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Michał Zegan Jan. 7, 2017, 12:44 a.m. UTC | #1
seems the patch works as intended.

W dniu 06.01.2017 o 13:34, Sudeep Holla pisze:
> Currently we add the virtual cpufreq device unconditionally even when
> the SCPI DVFS clock provider node is disabled. This will cause cpufreq
> driver to throw errors when it gets initailised on boot/modprobe and
> also when the CPUs are hot-plugged back in.
> 
> This patch fixes the issue by adding the virtual cpufreq device only if
> the SCPI DVFS clock provider is available and registered.
> 
> Fixes: 9490f01e2471 ("clk: scpi: add support for cpufreq virtual device")
> Reported-by: Michał Zegan <webczat_200@poczta.onet.pl>
> Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c | 14 ++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c b/drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c
> index 2a3e9d8e88b0..96d37175d0ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c
> @@ -290,13 +290,15 @@ static int scpi_clocks_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			of_node_put(child);
>  			return ret;
>  		}
> -	}
> -	/* Add the virtual cpufreq device */
> -	cpufreq_dev = platform_device_register_simple("scpi-cpufreq",
> -						      -1, NULL, 0);
> -	if (IS_ERR(cpufreq_dev))
> -		pr_warn("unable to register cpufreq device");
>  
> +		if (match->data != &scpi_dvfs_ops)
> +			continue;
> +		/* Add the virtual cpufreq device if it's DVFS clock provider */
> +		cpufreq_dev = platform_device_register_simple("scpi-cpufreq",
> +							      -1, NULL, 0);
> +		if (IS_ERR(cpufreq_dev))
> +			pr_warn("unable to register cpufreq device");
> +	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>
Sudeep Holla Jan. 9, 2017, 9:58 a.m. UTC | #2
On 07/01/17 00:44, Michał Zegan wrote:
> seems the patch works as intended.
> 

So, can we take this as
Tested-by: Michał Zegan <webczat_200@poczta.onet.pl> ?

> W dniu 06.01.2017 o 13:34, Sudeep Holla pisze:
>> Currently we add the virtual cpufreq device unconditionally even when
>> the SCPI DVFS clock provider node is disabled. This will cause cpufreq
>> driver to throw errors when it gets initailised on boot/modprobe and
>> also when the CPUs are hot-plugged back in.
>>
>> This patch fixes the issue by adding the virtual cpufreq device only if
>> the SCPI DVFS clock provider is available and registered.
>>
>> Fixes: 9490f01e2471 ("clk: scpi: add support for cpufreq virtual device")
>> Reported-by: Michał Zegan <webczat_200@poczta.onet.pl>
>> Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
>> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
>> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Michał Zegan Jan. 9, 2017, 10:14 a.m. UTC | #3
Of course.

W dniu 09.01.2017 o 10:58, Sudeep Holla pisze:
> 
> 
> On 07/01/17 00:44, Michał Zegan wrote:
>> seems the patch works as intended.
>>
> 
> So, can we take this as
> Tested-by: Michał Zegan <webczat_200@poczta.onet.pl> ?
> 
>> W dniu 06.01.2017 o 13:34, Sudeep Holla pisze:
>>> Currently we add the virtual cpufreq device unconditionally even when
>>> the SCPI DVFS clock provider node is disabled. This will cause cpufreq
>>> driver to throw errors when it gets initailised on boot/modprobe and
>>> also when the CPUs are hot-plugged back in.
>>>
>>> This patch fixes the issue by adding the virtual cpufreq device only if
>>> the SCPI DVFS clock provider is available and registered.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 9490f01e2471 ("clk: scpi: add support for cpufreq virtual device")
>>> Reported-by: Michał Zegan <webczat_200@poczta.onet.pl>
>>> Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
>>> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
>>> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>
Stephen Boyd Jan. 10, 2017, 12:08 a.m. UTC | #4
On 01/06, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Currently we add the virtual cpufreq device unconditionally even when
> the SCPI DVFS clock provider node is disabled. This will cause cpufreq
> driver to throw errors when it gets initailised on boot/modprobe and
> also when the CPUs are hot-plugged back in.
> 
> This patch fixes the issue by adding the virtual cpufreq device only if
> the SCPI DVFS clock provider is available and registered.
> 
> Fixes: 9490f01e2471 ("clk: scpi: add support for cpufreq virtual device")
> Reported-by: Michał Zegan <webczat_200@poczta.onet.pl>
> Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---

Applied to clk-next
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c b/drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c
index 2a3e9d8e88b0..96d37175d0ad 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c
@@ -290,13 +290,15 @@  static int scpi_clocks_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			of_node_put(child);
 			return ret;
 		}
-	}
-	/* Add the virtual cpufreq device */
-	cpufreq_dev = platform_device_register_simple("scpi-cpufreq",
-						      -1, NULL, 0);
-	if (IS_ERR(cpufreq_dev))
-		pr_warn("unable to register cpufreq device");
 
+		if (match->data != &scpi_dvfs_ops)
+			continue;
+		/* Add the virtual cpufreq device if it's DVFS clock provider */
+		cpufreq_dev = platform_device_register_simple("scpi-cpufreq",
+							      -1, NULL, 0);
+		if (IS_ERR(cpufreq_dev))
+			pr_warn("unable to register cpufreq device");
+	}
 	return 0;
 }