Message ID | 20200113152656.2313846-1-heiko@sntech.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | clk: rockchip: convert rk3036 pll type to use internal lock status | expand |
Quoting Heiko Stuebner (2020-01-13 07:26:56) > diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c > index 198417d56300..37378ded0993 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c > @@ -118,12 +118,30 @@ static int rockchip_pll_wait_lock(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll) > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_REFDIV_SHIFT 0 > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_POSTDIV2_MASK 0x7 > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_POSTDIV2_SHIFT 6 > +#define RK3036_PLLCON1_LOCK_STATUS BIT(10) > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_DSMPD_MASK 0x1 > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_DSMPD_SHIFT 12 > +#define RK3036_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN BIT(13) > #define RK3036_PLLCON2_FRAC_MASK 0xffffff > #define RK3036_PLLCON2_FRAC_SHIFT 0 > > -#define RK3036_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN (1 << 13) > +static int rockchip_rk3036_pll_wait_lock(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll) > +{ > + u32 pllcon; > + int delay = 24000000; > + > + /* poll check the lock status in rk3399 xPLLCON2 */ > + while (delay > 0) { > + pllcon = readl_relaxed(pll->reg_base + RK3036_PLLCON(1)); > + if (pllcon & RK3036_PLLCON1_LOCK_STATUS) > + return 0; > + > + delay--; There isn't any udelay here. So the timeout is just as fast as the CPU can churn through this? Why not use an actual time? Or use the readl_poll_timeout() APIs? > + } > + > + pr_err("%s: timeout waiting for pll to lock\n", __func__); > + return -ETIMEDOUT; > +} > > static void rockchip_rk3036_pll_get_params(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll, > struct rockchip_pll_rate_table *rate)
Am Dienstag, 14. Januar 2020, 06:05:18 CET schrieb Stephen Boyd: > Quoting Heiko Stuebner (2020-01-13 07:26:56) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c > > index 198417d56300..37378ded0993 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c > > @@ -118,12 +118,30 @@ static int rockchip_pll_wait_lock(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll) > > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_REFDIV_SHIFT 0 > > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_POSTDIV2_MASK 0x7 > > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_POSTDIV2_SHIFT 6 > > +#define RK3036_PLLCON1_LOCK_STATUS BIT(10) > > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_DSMPD_MASK 0x1 > > #define RK3036_PLLCON1_DSMPD_SHIFT 12 > > +#define RK3036_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN BIT(13) > > #define RK3036_PLLCON2_FRAC_MASK 0xffffff > > #define RK3036_PLLCON2_FRAC_SHIFT 0 > > > > -#define RK3036_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN (1 << 13) > > +static int rockchip_rk3036_pll_wait_lock(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll) > > +{ > > + u32 pllcon; > > + int delay = 24000000; > > + > > + /* poll check the lock status in rk3399 xPLLCON2 */ > > + while (delay > 0) { > > + pllcon = readl_relaxed(pll->reg_base + RK3036_PLLCON(1)); > > + if (pllcon & RK3036_PLLCON1_LOCK_STATUS) > > + return 0; > > + > > + delay--; > > There isn't any udelay here. So the timeout is just as fast as the CPU > can churn through this? Why not use an actual time? Or use the > readl_poll_timeout() APIs? Done in http://lore.kernel.org/r/20200128100204.1318450-3-heiko@sntech.de and to keep things similar, I did a conversion to iopoll helpers for the other variants too. Heiko
diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c index 198417d56300..37378ded0993 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c @@ -118,12 +118,30 @@ static int rockchip_pll_wait_lock(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll) #define RK3036_PLLCON1_REFDIV_SHIFT 0 #define RK3036_PLLCON1_POSTDIV2_MASK 0x7 #define RK3036_PLLCON1_POSTDIV2_SHIFT 6 +#define RK3036_PLLCON1_LOCK_STATUS BIT(10) #define RK3036_PLLCON1_DSMPD_MASK 0x1 #define RK3036_PLLCON1_DSMPD_SHIFT 12 +#define RK3036_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN BIT(13) #define RK3036_PLLCON2_FRAC_MASK 0xffffff #define RK3036_PLLCON2_FRAC_SHIFT 0 -#define RK3036_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN (1 << 13) +static int rockchip_rk3036_pll_wait_lock(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll) +{ + u32 pllcon; + int delay = 24000000; + + /* poll check the lock status in rk3399 xPLLCON2 */ + while (delay > 0) { + pllcon = readl_relaxed(pll->reg_base + RK3036_PLLCON(1)); + if (pllcon & RK3036_PLLCON1_LOCK_STATUS) + return 0; + + delay--; + } + + pr_err("%s: timeout waiting for pll to lock\n", __func__); + return -ETIMEDOUT; +} static void rockchip_rk3036_pll_get_params(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll, struct rockchip_pll_rate_table *rate) @@ -221,7 +239,7 @@ static int rockchip_rk3036_pll_set_params(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll, writel_relaxed(pllcon, pll->reg_base + RK3036_PLLCON(2)); /* wait for the pll to lock */ - ret = rockchip_pll_wait_lock(pll); + ret = rockchip_rk3036_pll_wait_lock(pll); if (ret) { pr_warn("%s: pll update unsuccessful, trying to restore old params\n", __func__); @@ -260,7 +278,7 @@ static int rockchip_rk3036_pll_enable(struct clk_hw *hw) writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(0, RK3036_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN, 0), pll->reg_base + RK3036_PLLCON(1)); - rockchip_pll_wait_lock(pll); + rockchip_rk3036_pll_wait_lock(pll); return 0; }