| Message ID | 87zikbuezr.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Delegated to: | Stephen Boyd |
| Headers | show |
On 12/05, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> > > Current simple-card is supporting this style for clocks > > sound { > ... > simple-audio-card,cpu { > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > clocks = <&cpu_clock>; > }; > simple-audio-card,codec { > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > clocks = <&codec_clock>; > }; > }; > > Now, it can support this style too, because we can use > devm_get_clk_from_child() now. > > sound { > ... > clocks = <&cpu_clock>, <&codec_clock>; > clock-names = "cpu", "codec"; > clock-ranges; > ... > simple-audio-card,cpu { > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > }; > simple-audio-card,codec { > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > }; > }; > > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> I don't see any reason why we need this patch though. The binding works as is, so supporting different styles doesn't seem like a good idea to me. Let's just keep what we have? Even if a sub-node like cpu or codec gets more than one element in the clocks list property, we can make that work by passing a clock-name then based on some sort of other knowledge.
Hi Stephen > > From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> > > > > Current simple-card is supporting this style for clocks > > > > sound { > > ... > > simple-audio-card,cpu { > > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > > clocks = <&cpu_clock>; > > }; > > simple-audio-card,codec { > > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > > clocks = <&codec_clock>; > > }; > > }; > > > > Now, it can support this style too, because we can use > > devm_get_clk_from_child() now. > > > > sound { > > ... > > clocks = <&cpu_clock>, <&codec_clock>; > > clock-names = "cpu", "codec"; > > clock-ranges; > > ... > > simple-audio-card,cpu { > > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > > }; > > simple-audio-card,codec { > > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > > }; > > }; > > > > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> > > I don't see any reason why we need this patch though. The binding > works as is, so supporting different styles doesn't seem like a > good idea to me. Let's just keep what we have? Even if a sub-node > like cpu or codec gets more than one element in the clocks list > property, we can make that work by passing a clock-name then > based on some sort of other knowledge. OK, thanks. Let's skip this patch. But I believe this idea itself is not wrong (?) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-clk" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Stephen > > From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> > > > > Current simple-card is supporting this style for clocks > > > > sound { > > ... > > simple-audio-card,cpu { > > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > > clocks = <&cpu_clock>; > > }; > > simple-audio-card,codec { > > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > > clocks = <&codec_clock>; > > }; > > }; > > > > Now, it can support this style too, because we can use > > devm_get_clk_from_child() now. > > > > sound { > > ... > > clocks = <&cpu_clock>, <&codec_clock>; > > clock-names = "cpu", "codec"; > > clock-ranges; > > ... > > simple-audio-card,cpu { > > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > > }; > > simple-audio-card,codec { > > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > > }; > > }; > > > > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> > > I don't see any reason why we need this patch though. The binding > works as is, so supporting different styles doesn't seem like a > good idea to me. Let's just keep what we have? Even if a sub-node > like cpu or codec gets more than one element in the clocks list > property, we can make that work by passing a clock-name then > based on some sort of other knowledge. OK, thanks. Let's skip this patch. But I believe this idea/method itself is not wrong (?) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-clk" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 12/09, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > Hi Stephen > > > > From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> > > > > > > Current simple-card is supporting this style for clocks > > > > > > sound { > > > ... > > > simple-audio-card,cpu { > > > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > > > clocks = <&cpu_clock>; > > > }; > > > simple-audio-card,codec { > > > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > > > clocks = <&codec_clock>; > > > }; > > > }; > > > > > > Now, it can support this style too, because we can use > > > devm_get_clk_from_child() now. > > > > > > sound { > > > ... > > > clocks = <&cpu_clock>, <&codec_clock>; > > > clock-names = "cpu", "codec"; > > > clock-ranges; > > > ... > > > simple-audio-card,cpu { > > > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > > > }; > > > simple-audio-card,codec { > > > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > > > }; > > > }; > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> > > > > I don't see any reason why we need this patch though. The binding > > works as is, so supporting different styles doesn't seem like a > > good idea to me. Let's just keep what we have? Even if a sub-node > > like cpu or codec gets more than one element in the clocks list > > property, we can make that work by passing a clock-name then > > based on some sort of other knowledge. > > OK, thanks. Let's skip this patch. > But I believe this idea/method itself is not wrong (?) > Right it's not wrong, just seems confusing to have two methods.
Hi Stephen > > > I don't see any reason why we need this patch though. The binding > > > works as is, so supporting different styles doesn't seem like a > > > good idea to me. Let's just keep what we have? Even if a sub-node > > > like cpu or codec gets more than one element in the clocks list > > > property, we can make that work by passing a clock-name then > > > based on some sort of other knowledge. > > > > OK, thanks. Let's skip this patch. > > But I believe this idea/method itself is not wrong (?) > > > Right it's not wrong, just seems confusing to have two methods. Thanks. Very clear for me :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-clk" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.txt index c7a9393..43a710b 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.txt @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ Optional CPU/CODEC subnodes properties: in dai startup() and disabled with clk_disable_unprepare() in dai shutdown(). + see Clock Example. Example 1 - single DAI link: @@ -199,3 +200,34 @@ sound { clocks = ... }; }; + + +Clock Example 1 - clock settings on each subnode + +sound { + ... + simple-audio-card,cpu { + sound-dai = <&xxx>; + clocks = <&cpu_clock>; + }; + simple-audio-card,codec { + sound-dai = <&xxx>; + clocks = <&codec_clock>; + }; +}; + +Clock Example 2 - clock settings by clocks + +sound { + ... + clocks = <&cpu_clock>, <&codec_clock>; + clock-names = "cpu", "codec"; + clock-ranges; + ... + simple-audio-card,cpu { + sound-dai = <&xxx>; + }; + simple-audio-card,codec { + sound-dai = <&xxx>; + }; +}; diff --git a/sound/soc/generic/simple-card-utils.c b/sound/soc/generic/simple-card-utils.c index 4924575..c3031a5 100644 --- a/sound/soc/generic/simple-card-utils.c +++ b/sound/soc/generic/simple-card-utils.c @@ -104,15 +104,52 @@ int asoc_simple_card_parse_clk(struct device *dev, struct asoc_simple_dai *simple_dai) { struct clk *clk; + const char *con_id = NULL; + const char *port_name[] = { + "cpu", "codec" + }; u32 val; /* + * We can use this style if "con_id" is not NULL + * + * sound { + * ... + * clocks = <&xxx>, <&xxx>; + * clock-names = "cpu", "codec"; + * clock-ranges; + * + * simple-audio-card,cpu { + * sound-dai = <&xxx>; + * }; + * simple-audio-card,codec { + * sound-dai = <&xxx>; + * }; + * }; + */ + if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "clock-names", NULL)) { + int i; + int port_len, node_len; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(port_name); i++) { + node_len = strlen(node->name); + port_len = strlen(port_name[i]); + + if (0 == strncmp(node->name + node_len - port_len, + port_name[i], port_len)) { + con_id = port_name[i]; + break; + } + } + } + + /* * Parse dai->sysclk come from "clocks = <&xxx>" * (if system has common clock) * or "system-clock-frequency = <xxx>" * or device's module clock. */ - clk = devm_get_clk_from_child(dev, node, NULL); + clk = devm_get_clk_from_child(dev, node, con_id); if (!IS_ERR(clk)) { simple_dai->sysclk = clk_get_rate(clk); } else if (!of_property_read_u32(node, "system-clock-frequency", &val)) {