| Message ID | b5937ad5c068eeec19005d40dbddb97e09c1b3d0.1514190227.git.sean.wang@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Rejected, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 12/25, sean.wang@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> > > In fact, the clk-mtk.h header is indeed not needed for reset.c and thus > it's safe and good change to remove it from the file. > > Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> > Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> > Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> > --- > drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c > index d3551d5..70ebb2e 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c > @@ -19,8 +19,6 @@ > #include <linux/reset-controller.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > > -#include "clk-mtk.h" > - drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c:64:6: warning: symbol 'mtk_register_reset_controller' was not declared. Should it be static?
On Tue, 2017-12-26 at 17:10 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 12/25, sean.wang@mediatek.com wrote: > > From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> > > > > In fact, the clk-mtk.h header is indeed not needed for reset.c and thus > > it's safe and good change to remove it from the file. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> > > Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> > > Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> > > --- > > drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c | 2 -- > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c > > index d3551d5..70ebb2e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c > > @@ -19,8 +19,6 @@ > > #include <linux/reset-controller.h> > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > > > -#include "clk-mtk.h" > > - > > drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c:64:6: warning: symbol 'mtk_register_reset_controller' was not declared. Should it be static? > It cannot be static since the function would be referenced in other files under the same folder One point I felt confused which is I didn't see the warning complains when I did these build test, even I also added -Werror and -Wall to build all files under driver/clk/mediatek. My toolchain is based on gcc version 5.2.0 (GCC). If the warning still is, the include "clk-mtk.h" should be good to stay there because the declaration it needs is in the clk-mtk.h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-clk" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Sean, Stephen, On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 11:33:00 +0800, Sean Wang wrote: > On Tue, 2017-12-26 at 17:10 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c:64:6: warning: symbol 'mtk_register_reset_controller' was not declared. Should it be static? > > It cannot be static since the function would be referenced in other > files under the same folder > > > One point I felt confused which is I didn't see the warning complains > when I did these build test, even I also added -Werror and -Wall to > build all files under driver/clk/mediatek. My toolchain is based on gcc > version 5.2.0 (GCC). I tested and I get the warning here (gcc 4.8.5 on SUSE) but only after setting CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER=y. Without it, drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.o is never built, so no warning can be generated. > If the warning still is, the include "clk-mtk.h" should be good to stay > there because the declaration it needs is in the clk-mtk.h Agreed.
On 12/27, Sean Wang wrote: > On Tue, 2017-12-26 at 17:10 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 12/25, sean.wang@mediatek.com wrote: > > > From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> > > > > > > In fact, the clk-mtk.h header is indeed not needed for reset.c and thus > > > it's safe and good change to remove it from the file. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> > > > Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> > > > --- > > > drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c | 2 -- > > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c > > > index d3551d5..70ebb2e 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c > > > @@ -19,8 +19,6 @@ > > > #include <linux/reset-controller.h> > > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > > > > > -#include "clk-mtk.h" > > > - > > > > drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c:64:6: warning: symbol 'mtk_register_reset_controller' was not declared. Should it be static? > > > > It cannot be static since the function would be referenced in other > files under the same folder > > > One point I felt confused which is I didn't see the warning complains > when I did these build test, even I also added -Werror and -Wall to > build all files under driver/clk/mediatek. My toolchain is based on gcc > version 5.2.0 (GCC). > > > If the warning still is, the include "clk-mtk.h" should be good to stay > there because the declaration it needs is in the clk-mtk.h > The warning is from sparse. I built the file with C=2 on the commandline.
diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c index d3551d5..70ebb2e 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c @@ -19,8 +19,6 @@ #include <linux/reset-controller.h> #include <linux/slab.h> -#include "clk-mtk.h" - struct mtk_reset { struct regmap *regmap; int regofs;