Message ID | 20211209090358.28231-1-nstange@suse.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | crypto: dh - infrastructure for NVM in-band auth and FIPS conformance | expand |
Am Donnerstag, 9. Dezember 2021, 10:03:40 CET schrieb Nicolai Stange:
Hi Nicolai,
I successfully tested the entire patch set with the NIST ACVP reference
implementation which covers key generation for all safe prime groups defined
in your patch set.
Tested-by: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
Ciao
Stephan
Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de> writes: > Am Donnerstag, 9. Dezember 2021, 10:03:40 CET schrieb Nicolai Stange: > > I successfully tested the entire patch set with the NIST ACVP reference > implementation which covers key generation for all safe prime groups defined > in your patch set. > > Tested-by: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de> Thank you! Nicolai
On 12/9/21 10:03 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote: > Hi all, > > first of all, to the people primarily interested in security/keys/, there's > a rather trivial change to security/keys/dh.c in patch 2/18. It would be > great to get ACKs for that... > > This is v2, v1 can be found at > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211201004858.19831-1-nstange@suse.de > > For a list of changes, see below. > > Quote from v1's cover letter: > === > Hannes' recent work on NVME in-band authentication ([1]) needs access to > the RFC 7919 DH group parameters and also some means to generate ephemeral > keys. He currently implements both as part of his patchset (patches 3/12 > and 8/12). After some internal discussion, we decided to split off the bits > needed from crypto/dh into a separate series, i.e. this one here: > - for the RFC 7919 DH group parameters, it's undesirable from a > performance POV to serialize the well-known domain parameters via > crypto_dh_encode_key() just to deserialize them shortly after again, > - from an architectural POV, it would be preferrable to have the key > generation code in crypto/dh.c rather than in drivers/nvme/, > just in analogy to how key generation is supported by crypto/ecdh.c > already. > > Patches 1-13/18 implement all that is needed for the NVME in-band > authentication support. > > Unfortunately, due to the lack of HW, I have not been able to test > the changes to the QAT or HPRE drivers (other than mere compile tests). > Yet I figured it would be a good idea to have them behave consistently with > dh_generic, and so I chose to introduce support for privkey generation to > these as well. > > > By coincidence, NIST SP800-56Arev3 compliance effectively requires that > the domain parameters are checked against an approved set, which happens > to consists of those safe-prime group parameters specified in RFC 7919, > among others. Thus, introducing the RFC 7919 parameters to the kernel > allows for making the DH implementation to conform to SP800-56Arev3 with > only little effort. I used the opportunity to work crypto/dh towards > SP800-56Arev3 conformance with the rest of this patch series, i.e. > patches 14-18/18. I can split these into another series on its own, if you > like. But as they depend on the earlier patches 1-13/18, I sent them > alongside for now. > === > > This patchset has been tested with and without fips_enabled on x86_64, > ppc64le and s390x, the latter being big endian. > > > Changes v1 -> v2: > - Throughout the patchset: > - Upcase enum group_id members and strip superfluous _RFCXYZ_ parts from > the names. > - Carry Hannes' Reviewed-bys from v1 over for those patches which > have not changed (except for that group_id member renaming) > - [03/18] ("crypto: dh - optimize domain parameter serialization for > well-known groups"): > - For better portability, don't serialize/deserialize directly from/to > an enum group_id, but use an intermediate int for that. > - [05/18] ("crypto: testmgr - add DH RFC 7919 ffdhe2048 test vector") > - Use ffdhe3072 TVs rather than ones for ffdhe2048. Requested by Hannes, > because "the NVMe spec mandates for its TLS profile the ffdhe3072 > group". > - [13/18] ("crypto: testmgr - add DH test vectors for key generation") > - Use ffdhe3072 in place of ffdhe2048 here as well. > - Rather than introducing completely new keypairs, reuse the ones > from the known answer test introduced previously in this patchset. > > Thanks, > > Nicolai > > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211123123801.73197-1-hare@suse.de > > > Nicolai Stange (18): > crypto: dh - remove struct dh's ->q member > crypto: dh - constify struct dh's pointer members > crypto: dh - optimize domain parameter serialization for well-known > groups > crypto: dh - introduce RFC 7919 safe-prime groups > crypto: testmgr - add DH RFC 7919 ffdhe3072 test vector > crypto: dh - introduce RFC 3526 safe-prime groups > crypto: testmgr - add DH RFC 3526 modp2048 test vector > crypto: testmgr - run only subset of DH vectors based on config > crypto: dh - implement private key generation primitive > crypto: dh - introduce support for ephemeral key generation to > dh-generic > crypto: dh - introduce support for ephemeral key generation to hpre > driver > crypto: dh - introduce support for ephemeral key generation to qat > driver > crypto: testmgr - add DH test vectors for key generation > lib/mpi: export mpi_rshift > crypto: dh - store group id in dh-generic's dh_ctx > crypto: dh - calculate Q from P for the full public key verification > crypto: dh - try to match domain parameters to a known safe-prime > group > crypto: dh - accept only approved safe-prime groups in FIPS mode > > crypto/Kconfig | 20 +- > crypto/dh.c | 73 +- > crypto/dh_helper.c | 691 +++++++++++++++++- > crypto/testmgr.h | 388 +++++++++- > drivers/crypto/hisilicon/hpre/hpre_crypto.c | 11 + > drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_asym_algs.c | 9 + > include/crypto/dh.h | 52 +- > lib/mpi/mpi-bit.c | 1 + > security/keys/dh.c | 2 +- > 9 files changed, 1189 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) > I have run this implementation against my NVMe In-band authentication test suite and have found no issues. Tested-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Cheers, Hannes
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> writes: > I have run this implementation against my NVMe In-band authentication > test suite and have found no issues. > > Tested-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Thank you! Nicolai