From patchwork Mon Jan 18 15:49:58 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Peter Jones X-Patchwork-Id: 8055641 X-Patchwork-Delegate: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-crypto@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork2.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by patchwork2.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7985BEEE5 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB45E2045A for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B2C20357 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755568AbcARPuB (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:50:01 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47770 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755585AbcARPuA (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:50:00 -0500 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B62DA7AE8B; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fenchurch.internal.datastacks.com (ovpn-113-50.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.50]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u0IFnxuq014531; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:49:59 -0500 From: Peter Jones To: Dave Young Cc: David Howells , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, xlpang@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, Peter Jones Subject: [PATCH] Don't require SpcSpOpusInfo in Authenticode pkcs7 signatures Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:49:58 -0500 Message-Id: <1453132198-19644-1-git-send-email-pjones@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20160115081249.GA19487@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> References: <20160115081249.GA19487@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23 Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Dave Young reported: > Hi, > > I saw the warning "Missing required AuthAttr" when testing kexec, > known issue? Idea about how to fix it? > > The kernel is latest linus tree plus sevral patches from Toshi to > cleanup io resource structure. > > in function pkcs7_sig_note_set_of_authattrs(): > if (!test_bit(sinfo_has_content_type, &sinfo->aa_set) || > !test_bit(sinfo_has_message_digest, &sinfo->aa_set) || > (ctx->msg->data_type == OID_msIndirectData && > !test_bit(sinfo_has_ms_opus_info, &sinfo->aa_set))) { > pr_warn("Missing required AuthAttr\n"); > return -EBADMSG; > } > > The third condition below is true: > (ctx->msg->data_type == OID_msIndirectData && > !test_bit(sinfo_has_ms_opus_info, &sinfo->aa_set)) > > I signed the kernel with redhat test key like below: > pesign -c 'Red Hat Test Certificate' -i arch/x86/boot/bzImage -o /boot/vmlinuz-4.4.0-rc8+ -s --force And right he is! The Authenticode specification is a paragon amongst technical documents, and has this pearl of wisdom to offer: --------------------------------- Authenticode-Specific SignerInfo UnauthenticatedAttributes Structures The following Authenticode-specific data structures are present in SignerInfo authenticated attributes. SpcSpOpusInfo SpcSpOpusInfo is identified by SPC_SP_OPUS_INFO_OBJID (1.3.6.1.4.1.311.2.1.12) and is defined as follows: SpcSpOpusInfo ::= SEQUENCE { programName [0] EXPLICIT SpcString OPTIONAL, moreInfo [1] EXPLICIT SpcLink OPTIONAL, } --#public-- SpcSpOpusInfo has two fields: programName This field contains the program description: If publisher chooses not to specify a description, the SpcString structure contains a zero-length program name. If the publisher chooses to specify a description, the SpcString structure contains a Unicode string. moreInfo This field is set to an SPCLink structure that contains a URL for a Web site with more information about the signer. The URL is an ASCII string. --------------------------------- Which is to say that this is an optional *unauthenticated* field which may be present in the Authenticated Attribute list. This is not how pkcs7 is supposed to work, so when David implemented this, he didn't appreciate the subtlety the original spec author was working with, and missed the part of the sublime prose that says this Authenticated Attribute is an Unauthenticated Attribute. As a result, the code in question simply takes as given that the Authenticated Attributes should be authenticated. But this one should not, individually. Because it says it's not authenticated. It still has to hash right so the TBS digest is correct. So it is both authenticated and unauthenticated, all at once. Truly, a wonder of technical accomplishment. Additionally, pesign's implementation has always attempted to be compatible with the signatures emitted from contemporary versions of Microsoft's signtool.exe. During the initial implementation, Microsoft signatures always produced the same values for SpcSpOpusInfo - {U"Microsoft Windows", "http://www.microsoft.com"} - without regard to who the signer was. Sometime between Windows 8 and Windows 8.1 they stopped including the field in their signatures altogether, and as such pesign stopped producing them in commits c0c4da6 and d79cb0c, sometime around June of 2012. The theory here is that anything that breaks with pesign signatures would also be breaking with signtool.exe sigs as well, and that'll be a more noticed problem for firmwares parsing it, so it'll get fixed. The fact that we've done exactly this bug in Linux code is first class, grade A irony. So anyway, we should not be checking this field for presence or any particular value: if the field exists, it should be at the right place, but aside from that, as long as the hash matches the field is good. Signed-off-by: Peter Jones Tested-by: Dave Young --- crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c index 758acab..8f3056c 100644 --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_parser.c @@ -547,9 +547,7 @@ int pkcs7_sig_note_set_of_authattrs(void *context, size_t hdrlen, struct pkcs7_signed_info *sinfo = ctx->sinfo; if (!test_bit(sinfo_has_content_type, &sinfo->aa_set) || - !test_bit(sinfo_has_message_digest, &sinfo->aa_set) || - (ctx->msg->data_type == OID_msIndirectData && - !test_bit(sinfo_has_ms_opus_info, &sinfo->aa_set))) { + !test_bit(sinfo_has_message_digest, &sinfo->aa_set)) { pr_warn("Missing required AuthAttr\n"); return -EBADMSG; }