@@ -104,9 +104,16 @@ int asymmetric_verify(struct key *keyring, const char *sig,
memset(&pks, 0, sizeof(pks));
- pks.pkey_algo = "rsa";
pks.hash_algo = hash_algo_name[hdr->hash_algo];
- pks.encoding = "pkcs1";
+ if (hdr->hash_algo == HASH_ALGO_STREEBOG_256 ||
+ hdr->hash_algo == HASH_ALGO_STREEBOG_512) {
+ /* EC-RDSA and Streebog should go together. */
+ pks.pkey_algo = "ecrdsa";
+ pks.encoding = "raw";
+ } else {
+ pks.pkey_algo = "rsa";
+ pks.encoding = "pkcs1";
+ }
pks.digest = (u8 *)data;
pks.digest_size = datalen;
pks.s = hdr->sig;
Allow to use EC-RDSA signatures for IMA by determining signature type by the hash algorithm name. This works good for EC-RDSA since Streebog and EC-RDSA should always be used together. Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com> Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Vitaly Chikunov <vt@altlinux.org> --- Changes since v5: - This should go over "[PATCH v5 00/10] crypto: add EC-RDSA (GOST 34.10) algorithm" instead of "[PATCH v5 10/10] integrity: support EC-RDSA signatures for asymmetric_verify." - Comparison of hash algo by enum id instead of text name, as suggested by Thiago Jung Bauermann and Mimi Zohar. security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)