@@ -643,8 +643,8 @@ int padata_set_cpumask(struct padata_instance *pinst, int cpumask_type,
struct cpumask *serial_mask, *parallel_mask;
int err = -EINVAL;
- mutex_lock(&pinst->lock);
get_online_cpus();
+ mutex_lock(&pinst->lock);
switch (cpumask_type) {
case PADATA_CPU_PARALLEL:
@@ -662,8 +662,8 @@ int padata_set_cpumask(struct padata_instance *pinst, int cpumask_type,
err = __padata_set_cpumasks(pinst, parallel_mask, serial_mask);
out:
- put_online_cpus();
mutex_unlock(&pinst->lock);
+ put_online_cpus();
return err;
}
lockdep complains when padata's paths to update cpumasks via CPU hotplug and sysfs are both taken: # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online # echo ff > /sys/kernel/pcrypt/pencrypt/parallel_cpumask ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.4.0-rc8-padata-cpuhp-v3+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ bash/205 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff8286bcd0 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}, at: padata_set_cpumask+0x2b/0x120 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880001abfa0 (&pinst->lock){+.+.}, at: padata_set_cpumask+0x26/0x120 which lock already depends on the new lock. padata doesn't take cpu_hotplug_lock and pinst->lock in a consistent order. Which should be first? CPU hotplug calls into padata with cpu_hotplug_lock already held, so it should have priority. Fixes: 6751fb3c0e0c ("padata: Use get_online_cpus/put_online_cpus") Signed-off-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- kernel/padata.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)