diff mbox series

[v2,08/13] padata: switch padata_find_next() to using cpumask_next_wrap()

Message ID 20250128164646.4009-9-yury.norov@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series cpumask: cleanup cpumask_next_wrap() implementation and usage | expand

Commit Message

Yury Norov Jan. 28, 2025, 4:46 p.m. UTC 
Calling cpumask_next_wrap_old() with starting CPU == -1 effectively means
the request to find next CPU, wrapping around if needed.

cpumask_next_wrap() is the proper replacement for that.

Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Acked-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/padata.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/padata.c b/kernel/padata.c
index 78e202fabf90..b3d4eacc4f5d 100644
--- a/kernel/padata.c
+++ b/kernel/padata.c
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@  static struct padata_priv *padata_find_next(struct parallel_data *pd,
 	if (remove_object) {
 		list_del_init(&padata->list);
 		++pd->processed;
-		pd->cpu = cpumask_next_wrap_old(cpu, pd->cpumask.pcpu, -1, false);
+		pd->cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(cpu, pd->cpumask.pcpu);
 	}
 
 	spin_unlock(&reorder->lock);