@@ -377,7 +377,10 @@ mv_xor_slot_cleanup(struct mv_xor_chan *mv_chan)
static void mv_xor_tasklet(unsigned long data)
{
struct mv_xor_chan *chan = (struct mv_xor_chan *) data;
- mv_xor_slot_cleanup(chan);
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&chan->lock);
+ __mv_xor_slot_cleanup(chan);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&chan->lock);
}
static struct mv_xor_desc_slot *
@@ -656,9 +659,10 @@ static void mv_xor_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
struct mv_xor_desc_slot *iter, *_iter;
int in_use_descs = 0;
- mv_xor_slot_cleanup(mv_chan);
-
spin_lock_bh(&mv_chan->lock);
+
+ __mv_xor_slot_cleanup(mv_chan);
+
list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, _iter, &mv_chan->chain,
chain_node) {
in_use_descs++;
@@ -702,7 +706,10 @@ static enum dma_status mv_xor_status(struct dma_chan *chan,
ret = dma_cookie_status(chan, cookie, txstate);
if (ret == DMA_COMPLETE)
return ret;
- mv_xor_slot_cleanup(mv_chan);
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&mv_chan->lock);
+ __mv_xor_slot_cleanup(mv_chan);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&mv_chan->lock);
return dma_cookie_status(chan, cookie, txstate);
}
In order to simplify the code, remove all the calls to the locked mv_xor_slot_cleanup() and instead use the unlocked version only, It's less error prone to have just one function, and require the caller to ensure proper locking. Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> --- drivers/dma/mv_xor.c | 15 +++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)