@@ -518,8 +518,7 @@ static noinline int fpga_program_dma(struct fpga_dev *priv)
config.direction = DMA_MEM_TO_DEV;
config.dst_addr_width = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES;
config.dst_maxburst = fpga_fifo_size(priv->regs) / 2 / 4;
- ret = chan->device->device_control(chan, DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG,
- (unsigned long)&config);
+ ret = dmaengine_slave_config(chan, &config);
if (ret) {
dev_err(priv->dev, "DMA slave configuration failed\n");
goto out_dma_unmap;
@@ -532,9 +531,9 @@ static noinline int fpga_program_dma(struct fpga_dev *priv)
}
/* setup and submit the DMA transaction */
- tx = chan->device->device_prep_dma_sg(chan,
- table.sgl, num_pages,
- vb->sglist, vb->sglen, 0);
+
+ tx = dmaengine_prep_dma_sg(chan, table.sgl, num_pages,
+ vb->sglist, vb->sglen, 0);
if (!tx) {
dev_err(priv->dev, "Unable to prep DMA transaction\n");
ret = -ENOMEM;
The drivers should use dmaengine_slave_config() and dmaengine_prep_dma_sg() API instead of accessing the device_control which will be deprecated soon Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> --- drivers/misc/carma/carma-fpga-program.c | 9 ++++----- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)