Message ID | 1489414561-28912-3-git-send-email-cedric.madianga@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 03:15:58PM +0100, M'boumba Cedric Madianga wrote: > This patch implements the STM32 DMAMUX driver Can you describe the controller here pls > > Signed-off-by: M'boumba Cedric Madianga <cedric.madianga@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/dma/Kconfig | 9 ++ > drivers/dma/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 241 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/Kconfig b/drivers/dma/Kconfig > index fc3435c..6ab80c9 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/dma/Kconfig > @@ -461,6 +461,15 @@ config STM32_DMA > If you have a board based on such a MCU and wish to use DMA say Y > here. > > +config STM32_DMAMUX > + bool "STMicroelectronics STM32 dma multiplexer support" > + depends on STM32_DMA can you add compile test here so that we can get better compile coverage > + help > + Enable support for the on-chip DMA multiplexer on STMicroelectronics > + STM32 MCUs. > + If you have a board based on such a MCU and wish to use DMAMUX say Y > + here. > + > config S3C24XX_DMAC > bool "Samsung S3C24XX DMA support" > depends on ARCH_S3C24XX || COMPILE_TEST > diff --git a/drivers/dma/Makefile b/drivers/dma/Makefile > index 0b723e9..449c7a3 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/dma/Makefile > @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_DMA) += sh/ > obj-$(CONFIG_SIRF_DMA) += sirf-dma.o > obj-$(CONFIG_STE_DMA40) += ste_dma40.o ste_dma40_ll.o > obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_DMA) += stm32-dma.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_DMAMUX) += stm32-dmamux.o > obj-$(CONFIG_S3C24XX_DMAC) += s3c24xx-dma.o > obj-$(CONFIG_TXX9_DMAC) += txx9dmac.o > obj-$(CONFIG_TEGRA20_APB_DMA) += tegra20-apb-dma.o > diff --git a/drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c b/drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..3003546 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c > @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ > +/* > + * DMA Router driver for STM32 DMA MUX > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2015 M'Boumba Cedric Madianga <cedric.madianga@gmail.com> we are in '17 now :) > + * > + * Based on LPC18xx/43xx DMA MUX and TI DMA XBAR > + * > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > + * published by the Free Software Foundation. > + * > + */ > + > +#include <linux/clk.h> > +#include <linux/delay.h> > +#include <linux/err.h> > +#include <linux/init.h> > +#include <linux/of_device.h> > +#include <linux/of_dma.h> > +#include <linux/reset.h> > +#include <linux/slab.h> > + > +#define STM32_DMAMUX_CCR(x) (0x4 * (x)) > +#define STM32_DMAMUX_MAX_CHANNELS 32 > +#define STM32_DMAMUX_MAX_REQUESTS 255 > + > +struct stm32_dmamux { > + u32 chan_id; > + u32 request; > + bool busy; > +}; > + > +struct stm32_dmamux_data { > + struct dma_router dmarouter; > + struct stm32_dmamux *muxes; > + struct clk *clk; > + void __iomem *iomem; > + u32 dmamux_requests; /* number of DMA requests connected to DMAMUX */ > + u32 dmamux_channels; /* Number of DMA channels supported */ > +}; > + > +static inline u32 stm32_dmamux_read(void __iomem *iomem, u32 reg) > +{ > + return readl_relaxed(iomem + reg); > +} > + > +static inline void stm32_dmamux_write(void __iomem *iomem, u32 reg, u32 val) > +{ > + writel_relaxed(val, iomem + reg); > +} > + > +static void stm32_dmamux_free(struct device *dev, void *route_data) > +{ > + struct stm32_dmamux_data *dmamux = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + struct stm32_dmamux *mux = route_data; > + > + /* Clear dma request for the right channel */ > + stm32_dmamux_write(dmamux->iomem, STM32_DMAMUX_CCR(mux->chan_id), 0); > + clk_disable(dmamux->clk); > + mux->busy = false; > + > + dev_dbg(dev, "Unmapping dma-router%dchan%d (was routed to request%d)\n", > + dev->id, mux->chan_id, mux->request); > +} > + > +static void *stm32_dmamux_route_allocate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec, > + struct of_dma *ofdma) > +{ > + struct platform_device *pdev = of_find_device_by_node(ofdma->of_node); > + struct stm32_dmamux_data *dmamux = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + struct stm32_dmamux *mux; > + u32 chan_id; > + int ret; > + > + if (dma_spec->args_count != 4) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid number of dma mux args\n"); > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > + } > + > + if (dma_spec->args[0] >= dmamux->dmamux_channels) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid channel id: %d\n", > + dma_spec->args[0]); > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > + } > + > + if (dma_spec->args[1] > dmamux->dmamux_requests) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid mux request number: %d\n", > + dma_spec->args[1]); > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > + } > + > + /* The of_node_put() will be done in of_dma_router_xlate function */ > + dma_spec->np = of_parse_phandle(ofdma->of_node, "dma-masters", 0); > + if (!dma_spec->np) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't get dma master\n"); > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > + } > + > + chan_id = dma_spec->args[0]; > + mux = &dmamux->muxes[chan_id]; > + mux->chan_id = chan_id; > + mux->request = dma_spec->args[1]; > + > + if (mux->busy) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dma channel %d busy with request %d\n", > + chan_id, mux->request); > + return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY); > + } > + > + ret = clk_enable(dmamux->clk); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "clk_enable failed: %d\n", ret); > + return ERR_PTR(ret); > + } > + > + stm32_dmamux_write(dmamux->iomem, STM32_DMAMUX_CCR(mux->chan_id), > + mux->request); > + mux->busy = true; > + > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Mapping dma-router%dchan%d to request%d\n", > + pdev->dev.id, mux->chan_id, mux->request); > + > + return mux; > +} > + > +static int stm32_dmamux_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct device_node *dma_node, *node = pdev->dev.of_node; > + struct stm32_dmamux_data *dmamux; > + struct reset_control *rst; > + struct resource *res; > + int ret; > + > + if (!node) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + dmamux = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct stm32_dmamux_data), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!dmamux) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + dma_node = of_parse_phandle(node, "dma-masters", 0); > + if (!dma_node) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't get DMA master node\n"); > + return -ENODEV; > + } > + of_node_put(dma_node); > + > + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "dma-channels", > + &dmamux->dmamux_channels); can we have property_xxx calls alone, that way driver is not strictly dependent on of > + if (ret) > + dmamux->dmamux_channels = STM32_DMAMUX_MAX_CHANNELS; > + > + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "dma-requests", > + &dmamux->dmamux_requests); > + if (ret) > + dmamux->dmamux_requests = STM32_DMAMUX_MAX_REQUESTS; > + > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > + if (!res) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + dmamux->iomem = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); > + if (!dmamux->iomem) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + dmamux->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); > + if (IS_ERR(dmamux->clk)) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing controller clock\n"); > + return PTR_ERR(dmamux->clk); > + } > + ret = clk_prepare(dmamux->clk); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "clk_prep failed: %d\n", ret); > + return ret; > + } > + > + dmamux->muxes = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, dmamux->dmamux_channels, > + sizeof(struct stm32_dmamux), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!dmamux->muxes) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + rst = devm_reset_control_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); > + if (!IS_ERR(rst)) { > + ret = clk_enable(dmamux->clk); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "clk_enable failed: %d\n", ret); > + return ret; > + } > + reset_control_assert(rst); > + udelay(2); > + reset_control_deassert(rst); > + clk_disable(dmamux->clk); > + } > + > + dmamux->dmarouter.dev = &pdev->dev; > + dmamux->dmarouter.route_free = stm32_dmamux_free; > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dmamux); > + > + ret = of_dma_router_register(node, stm32_dmamux_route_allocate, > + &dmamux->dmarouter); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, > + "STM32 DMAMUX DMA OF registration failed %d\n", ret); > + return ret; > + } > + > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "STM32 DMAMUX driver registered\n"); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct of_device_id stm32_dmamux_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "st,stm32-dmamux" }, > + {}, > +}; > + > +static struct platform_driver stm32_dmamux_driver = { > + .probe = stm32_dmamux_probe, > + .driver = { > + .name = "stm32-dmamux", > + .of_match_table = stm32_dmamux_match, > + }, > +}; > + > +static int __init stm32_dmamux_init(void) > +{ > + return platform_driver_register(&stm32_dmamux_driver); > +} > +arch_initcall(stm32_dmamux_init); why not module init, wouldnt defer probe solve the dependencies
On 04/06/2017 08:40 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 03:15:58PM +0100, M'boumba Cedric Madianga wrote: >> This patch implements the STM32 DMAMUX driver > > Can you describe the controller here pls OK. Will be done in V2 > >> >> Signed-off-by: M'boumba Cedric Madianga <cedric.madianga@gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/dma/Kconfig | 9 ++ >> drivers/dma/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 241 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c >> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/Kconfig b/drivers/dma/Kconfig >> index fc3435c..6ab80c9 100644 >> --- a/drivers/dma/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/dma/Kconfig >> @@ -461,6 +461,15 @@ config STM32_DMA >> If you have a board based on such a MCU and wish to use DMA say Y >> here. >> >> +config STM32_DMAMUX >> + bool "STMicroelectronics STM32 dma multiplexer support" >> + depends on STM32_DMA > > can you add compile test here so that we can get better compile coverage OK. Will be done in V2 > >> + help >> + Enable support for the on-chip DMA multiplexer on STMicroelectronics >> + STM32 MCUs. >> + If you have a board based on such a MCU and wish to use DMAMUX say Y >> + here. >> + >> config S3C24XX_DMAC >> bool "Samsung S3C24XX DMA support" >> depends on ARCH_S3C24XX || COMPILE_TEST >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/Makefile b/drivers/dma/Makefile >> index 0b723e9..449c7a3 100644 >> --- a/drivers/dma/Makefile >> +++ b/drivers/dma/Makefile >> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_DMA) += sh/ >> obj-$(CONFIG_SIRF_DMA) += sirf-dma.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_STE_DMA40) += ste_dma40.o ste_dma40_ll.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_DMA) += stm32-dma.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_DMAMUX) += stm32-dmamux.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_S3C24XX_DMAC) += s3c24xx-dma.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_TXX9_DMAC) += txx9dmac.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_TEGRA20_APB_DMA) += tegra20-apb-dma.o >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c b/drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..3003546 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ >> +/* >> + * DMA Router driver for STM32 DMA MUX >> + * >> + * Copyright (C) 2015 M'Boumba Cedric Madianga <cedric.madianga@gmail.com> > > we are in '17 now :) OK. Will be done in V2 > >> + * >> + * Based on LPC18xx/43xx DMA MUX and TI DMA XBAR >> + * >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as >> + * published by the Free Software Foundation. >> + * >> + */ >> + >> +#include <linux/clk.h> >> +#include <linux/delay.h> >> +#include <linux/err.h> >> +#include <linux/init.h> >> +#include <linux/of_device.h> >> +#include <linux/of_dma.h> >> +#include <linux/reset.h> >> +#include <linux/slab.h> >> + >> +#define STM32_DMAMUX_CCR(x) (0x4 * (x)) >> +#define STM32_DMAMUX_MAX_CHANNELS 32 >> +#define STM32_DMAMUX_MAX_REQUESTS 255 >> + >> +struct stm32_dmamux { >> + u32 chan_id; >> + u32 request; >> + bool busy; >> +}; >> + >> +struct stm32_dmamux_data { >> + struct dma_router dmarouter; >> + struct stm32_dmamux *muxes; >> + struct clk *clk; >> + void __iomem *iomem; >> + u32 dmamux_requests; /* number of DMA requests connected to DMAMUX */ >> + u32 dmamux_channels; /* Number of DMA channels supported */ >> +}; >> + >> +static inline u32 stm32_dmamux_read(void __iomem *iomem, u32 reg) >> +{ >> + return readl_relaxed(iomem + reg); >> +} >> + >> +static inline void stm32_dmamux_write(void __iomem *iomem, u32 reg, u32 val) >> +{ >> + writel_relaxed(val, iomem + reg); >> +} >> + >> +static void stm32_dmamux_free(struct device *dev, void *route_data) >> +{ >> + struct stm32_dmamux_data *dmamux = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> + struct stm32_dmamux *mux = route_data; >> + >> + /* Clear dma request for the right channel */ >> + stm32_dmamux_write(dmamux->iomem, STM32_DMAMUX_CCR(mux->chan_id), 0); >> + clk_disable(dmamux->clk); >> + mux->busy = false; >> + >> + dev_dbg(dev, "Unmapping dma-router%dchan%d (was routed to request%d)\n", >> + dev->id, mux->chan_id, mux->request); >> +} >> + >> +static void *stm32_dmamux_route_allocate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec, >> + struct of_dma *ofdma) >> +{ >> + struct platform_device *pdev = of_find_device_by_node(ofdma->of_node); >> + struct stm32_dmamux_data *dmamux = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); >> + struct stm32_dmamux *mux; >> + u32 chan_id; >> + int ret; >> + >> + if (dma_spec->args_count != 4) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid number of dma mux args\n"); >> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); >> + } >> + >> + if (dma_spec->args[0] >= dmamux->dmamux_channels) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid channel id: %d\n", >> + dma_spec->args[0]); >> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); >> + } >> + >> + if (dma_spec->args[1] > dmamux->dmamux_requests) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid mux request number: %d\n", >> + dma_spec->args[1]); >> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); >> + } >> + >> + /* The of_node_put() will be done in of_dma_router_xlate function */ >> + dma_spec->np = of_parse_phandle(ofdma->of_node, "dma-masters", 0); >> + if (!dma_spec->np) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't get dma master\n"); >> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); >> + } >> + >> + chan_id = dma_spec->args[0]; >> + mux = &dmamux->muxes[chan_id]; >> + mux->chan_id = chan_id; >> + mux->request = dma_spec->args[1]; >> + >> + if (mux->busy) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dma channel %d busy with request %d\n", >> + chan_id, mux->request); >> + return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY); >> + } >> + >> + ret = clk_enable(dmamux->clk); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "clk_enable failed: %d\n", ret); >> + return ERR_PTR(ret); >> + } >> + >> + stm32_dmamux_write(dmamux->iomem, STM32_DMAMUX_CCR(mux->chan_id), >> + mux->request); >> + mux->busy = true; >> + >> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Mapping dma-router%dchan%d to request%d\n", >> + pdev->dev.id, mux->chan_id, mux->request); >> + >> + return mux; >> +} >> + >> +static int stm32_dmamux_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + struct device_node *dma_node, *node = pdev->dev.of_node; >> + struct stm32_dmamux_data *dmamux; >> + struct reset_control *rst; >> + struct resource *res; >> + int ret; >> + >> + if (!node) >> + return -ENODEV; >> + >> + dmamux = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct stm32_dmamux_data), >> + GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!dmamux) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + dma_node = of_parse_phandle(node, "dma-masters", 0); >> + if (!dma_node) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't get DMA master node\n"); >> + return -ENODEV; >> + } >> + of_node_put(dma_node); >> + >> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "dma-channels", >> + &dmamux->dmamux_channels); > > can we have property_xxx calls alone, that way driver is not strictly > dependent on of Can you please explain what you are asking for ? Not sure to understand correctly. > >> + if (ret) >> + dmamux->dmamux_channels = STM32_DMAMUX_MAX_CHANNELS; >> + >> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "dma-requests", >> + &dmamux->dmamux_requests); >> + if (ret) >> + dmamux->dmamux_requests = STM32_DMAMUX_MAX_REQUESTS; >> + >> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); >> + if (!res) >> + return -ENODEV; >> + >> + dmamux->iomem = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); >> + if (!dmamux->iomem) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + dmamux->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); >> + if (IS_ERR(dmamux->clk)) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing controller clock\n"); >> + return PTR_ERR(dmamux->clk); >> + } >> + ret = clk_prepare(dmamux->clk); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "clk_prep failed: %d\n", ret); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + dmamux->muxes = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, dmamux->dmamux_channels, >> + sizeof(struct stm32_dmamux), >> + GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!dmamux->muxes) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + rst = devm_reset_control_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); >> + if (!IS_ERR(rst)) { >> + ret = clk_enable(dmamux->clk); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "clk_enable failed: %d\n", ret); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + reset_control_assert(rst); >> + udelay(2); >> + reset_control_deassert(rst); >> + clk_disable(dmamux->clk); >> + } >> + >> + dmamux->dmarouter.dev = &pdev->dev; >> + dmamux->dmarouter.route_free = stm32_dmamux_free; >> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dmamux); >> + >> + ret = of_dma_router_register(node, stm32_dmamux_route_allocate, >> + &dmamux->dmarouter); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, >> + "STM32 DMAMUX DMA OF registration failed %d\n", ret); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "STM32 DMAMUX driver registered\n"); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static const struct of_device_id stm32_dmamux_match[] = { >> + { .compatible = "st,stm32-dmamux" }, >> + {}, >> +}; >> + >> +static struct platform_driver stm32_dmamux_driver = { >> + .probe = stm32_dmamux_probe, >> + .driver = { >> + .name = "stm32-dmamux", >> + .of_match_table = stm32_dmamux_match, >> + }, >> +}; >> + >> +static int __init stm32_dmamux_init(void) >> +{ >> + return platform_driver_register(&stm32_dmamux_driver); >> +} >> +arch_initcall(stm32_dmamux_init); > > why not module init, wouldnt defer probe solve the dependencies > The reason behind many devices (device_initcall level) rely on DMAs. If init is deferred DMAMUX driver will be probed twice if dependents rely on it. This sounds not a good call. This explains arch_initcall level.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 09:17:37AM +0000, Pierre Yves MORDRET wrote: > >> + > >> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "dma-channels", > >> + &dmamux->dmamux_channels); > > > > can we have property_xxx calls alone, that way driver is not strictly > > dependent on of > > Can you please explain what you are asking for ? Not sure to understand > correctly. Use device_property_read_u32() which is a generic property API. > >> +static int __init stm32_dmamux_init(void) > >> +{ > >> + return platform_driver_register(&stm32_dmamux_driver); > >> +} > >> +arch_initcall(stm32_dmamux_init); > > > > why not module init, wouldnt defer probe solve the dependencies > > > > The reason behind many devices (device_initcall level) rely on DMAs. If > init is deferred DMAMUX driver will be probed twice if dependents rely > on it. This sounds not a good call. This explains arch_initcall level. Why not deferred probe was introduced to help with dependencies...
On 05/01/2017 08:03 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 09:17:37AM +0000, Pierre Yves MORDRET wrote: >>>> + >>>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "dma-channels", >>>> + &dmamux->dmamux_channels); >>> >>> can we have property_xxx calls alone, that way driver is not strictly >>> dependent on of >> >> Can you please explain what you are asking for ? Not sure to understand >> correctly. > > Use device_property_read_u32() which is a generic property API. OK Will be done in V2 > > >>>> +static int __init stm32_dmamux_init(void) >>>> +{ >>>> + return platform_driver_register(&stm32_dmamux_driver); >>>> +} >>>> +arch_initcall(stm32_dmamux_init); >>> >>> why not module init, wouldnt defer probe solve the dependencies >>> >> >> The reason behind many devices (device_initcall level) rely on DMAs. If >> init is deferred DMAMUX driver will be probed twice if dependents rely >> on it. This sounds not a good call. This explains arch_initcall level. > > Why not deferred probe was introduced to help with dependencies... > Most DMAs devices are already in subsys_initcall to avoid multiple useless probe when clients are deferred. This DMAMUx is itself on top of DMAs. DMAMUX ---> DMA#1 ---> Device Client #1 | |--> Device Client #2 | [...] | |--> Device Client #N | [...] |--> DMA#N ---> Device Client #1 |--> Device Client #2 [...] |--> Device Client #N arch_initcall might a good call in this case for DMAMUX. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/dma/Kconfig b/drivers/dma/Kconfig index fc3435c..6ab80c9 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/dma/Kconfig @@ -461,6 +461,15 @@ config STM32_DMA If you have a board based on such a MCU and wish to use DMA say Y here. +config STM32_DMAMUX + bool "STMicroelectronics STM32 dma multiplexer support" + depends on STM32_DMA + help + Enable support for the on-chip DMA multiplexer on STMicroelectronics + STM32 MCUs. + If you have a board based on such a MCU and wish to use DMAMUX say Y + here. + config S3C24XX_DMAC bool "Samsung S3C24XX DMA support" depends on ARCH_S3C24XX || COMPILE_TEST diff --git a/drivers/dma/Makefile b/drivers/dma/Makefile index 0b723e9..449c7a3 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/Makefile +++ b/drivers/dma/Makefile @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_DMA) += sh/ obj-$(CONFIG_SIRF_DMA) += sirf-dma.o obj-$(CONFIG_STE_DMA40) += ste_dma40.o ste_dma40_ll.o obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_DMA) += stm32-dma.o +obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_DMAMUX) += stm32-dmamux.o obj-$(CONFIG_S3C24XX_DMAC) += s3c24xx-dma.o obj-$(CONFIG_TXX9_DMAC) += txx9dmac.o obj-$(CONFIG_TEGRA20_APB_DMA) += tegra20-apb-dma.o diff --git a/drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c b/drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3003546 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ +/* + * DMA Router driver for STM32 DMA MUX + * + * Copyright (C) 2015 M'Boumba Cedric Madianga <cedric.madianga@gmail.com> + * + * Based on LPC18xx/43xx DMA MUX and TI DMA XBAR + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as + * published by the Free Software Foundation. + * + */ + +#include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/of_device.h> +#include <linux/of_dma.h> +#include <linux/reset.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> + +#define STM32_DMAMUX_CCR(x) (0x4 * (x)) +#define STM32_DMAMUX_MAX_CHANNELS 32 +#define STM32_DMAMUX_MAX_REQUESTS 255 + +struct stm32_dmamux { + u32 chan_id; + u32 request; + bool busy; +}; + +struct stm32_dmamux_data { + struct dma_router dmarouter; + struct stm32_dmamux *muxes; + struct clk *clk; + void __iomem *iomem; + u32 dmamux_requests; /* number of DMA requests connected to DMAMUX */ + u32 dmamux_channels; /* Number of DMA channels supported */ +}; + +static inline u32 stm32_dmamux_read(void __iomem *iomem, u32 reg) +{ + return readl_relaxed(iomem + reg); +} + +static inline void stm32_dmamux_write(void __iomem *iomem, u32 reg, u32 val) +{ + writel_relaxed(val, iomem + reg); +} + +static void stm32_dmamux_free(struct device *dev, void *route_data) +{ + struct stm32_dmamux_data *dmamux = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + struct stm32_dmamux *mux = route_data; + + /* Clear dma request for the right channel */ + stm32_dmamux_write(dmamux->iomem, STM32_DMAMUX_CCR(mux->chan_id), 0); + clk_disable(dmamux->clk); + mux->busy = false; + + dev_dbg(dev, "Unmapping dma-router%dchan%d (was routed to request%d)\n", + dev->id, mux->chan_id, mux->request); +} + +static void *stm32_dmamux_route_allocate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec, + struct of_dma *ofdma) +{ + struct platform_device *pdev = of_find_device_by_node(ofdma->of_node); + struct stm32_dmamux_data *dmamux = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct stm32_dmamux *mux; + u32 chan_id; + int ret; + + if (dma_spec->args_count != 4) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid number of dma mux args\n"); + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + } + + if (dma_spec->args[0] >= dmamux->dmamux_channels) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid channel id: %d\n", + dma_spec->args[0]); + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + } + + if (dma_spec->args[1] > dmamux->dmamux_requests) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid mux request number: %d\n", + dma_spec->args[1]); + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + } + + /* The of_node_put() will be done in of_dma_router_xlate function */ + dma_spec->np = of_parse_phandle(ofdma->of_node, "dma-masters", 0); + if (!dma_spec->np) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't get dma master\n"); + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + } + + chan_id = dma_spec->args[0]; + mux = &dmamux->muxes[chan_id]; + mux->chan_id = chan_id; + mux->request = dma_spec->args[1]; + + if (mux->busy) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dma channel %d busy with request %d\n", + chan_id, mux->request); + return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY); + } + + ret = clk_enable(dmamux->clk); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "clk_enable failed: %d\n", ret); + return ERR_PTR(ret); + } + + stm32_dmamux_write(dmamux->iomem, STM32_DMAMUX_CCR(mux->chan_id), + mux->request); + mux->busy = true; + + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Mapping dma-router%dchan%d to request%d\n", + pdev->dev.id, mux->chan_id, mux->request); + + return mux; +} + +static int stm32_dmamux_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct device_node *dma_node, *node = pdev->dev.of_node; + struct stm32_dmamux_data *dmamux; + struct reset_control *rst; + struct resource *res; + int ret; + + if (!node) + return -ENODEV; + + dmamux = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct stm32_dmamux_data), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!dmamux) + return -ENOMEM; + + dma_node = of_parse_phandle(node, "dma-masters", 0); + if (!dma_node) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't get DMA master node\n"); + return -ENODEV; + } + of_node_put(dma_node); + + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "dma-channels", + &dmamux->dmamux_channels); + if (ret) + dmamux->dmamux_channels = STM32_DMAMUX_MAX_CHANNELS; + + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "dma-requests", + &dmamux->dmamux_requests); + if (ret) + dmamux->dmamux_requests = STM32_DMAMUX_MAX_REQUESTS; + + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); + if (!res) + return -ENODEV; + + dmamux->iomem = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); + if (!dmamux->iomem) + return -ENOMEM; + + dmamux->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(dmamux->clk)) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing controller clock\n"); + return PTR_ERR(dmamux->clk); + } + ret = clk_prepare(dmamux->clk); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "clk_prep failed: %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + dmamux->muxes = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, dmamux->dmamux_channels, + sizeof(struct stm32_dmamux), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!dmamux->muxes) + return -ENOMEM; + + rst = devm_reset_control_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); + if (!IS_ERR(rst)) { + ret = clk_enable(dmamux->clk); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "clk_enable failed: %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + reset_control_assert(rst); + udelay(2); + reset_control_deassert(rst); + clk_disable(dmamux->clk); + } + + dmamux->dmarouter.dev = &pdev->dev; + dmamux->dmarouter.route_free = stm32_dmamux_free; + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dmamux); + + ret = of_dma_router_register(node, stm32_dmamux_route_allocate, + &dmamux->dmarouter); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, + "STM32 DMAMUX DMA OF registration failed %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "STM32 DMAMUX driver registered\n"); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct of_device_id stm32_dmamux_match[] = { + { .compatible = "st,stm32-dmamux" }, + {}, +}; + +static struct platform_driver stm32_dmamux_driver = { + .probe = stm32_dmamux_probe, + .driver = { + .name = "stm32-dmamux", + .of_match_table = stm32_dmamux_match, + }, +}; + +static int __init stm32_dmamux_init(void) +{ + return platform_driver_register(&stm32_dmamux_driver); +} +arch_initcall(stm32_dmamux_init);
This patch implements the STM32 DMAMUX driver Signed-off-by: M'boumba Cedric Madianga <cedric.madianga@gmail.com> --- drivers/dma/Kconfig | 9 ++ drivers/dma/Makefile | 1 + drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 241 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c