diff mbox series

[v4,05/11] dmaengine: Introduce DMA-device device_caps callback

Message ID 20200528222401.26941-6-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series dmaengine: dw: Take Baikal-T1 SoC DW DMAC peculiarities into account | expand

Commit Message

Serge Semin May 28, 2020, 10:23 p.m. UTC
There are DMA devices (like ours version of Synopsys DW DMAC) which have
DMA capabilities non-uniformly redistributed amongst the device channels.
In order to provide a way of exposing the channel-specific parameters to
the DMA engine consumers, we introduce a new DMA-device callback. In case
if provided it gets called from the dma_get_slave_caps() method and is
able to override the generic DMA-device capabilities.

Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

---

Changelog v3:
- This is a new patch created as a result of the discussion with Vinod and
  Andy in the framework of DW DMA burst and LLP capabilities.
---
 drivers/dma/dmaengine.c   | 3 +++
 include/linux/dmaengine.h | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

Comments

Andy Shevchenko May 29, 2020, 12:12 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 01:23:55AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> There are DMA devices (like ours version of Synopsys DW DMAC) which have
> DMA capabilities non-uniformly redistributed amongst the device channels.
> In order to provide a way of exposing the channel-specific parameters to
> the DMA engine consumers, we introduce a new DMA-device callback. In case
> if provided it gets called from the dma_get_slave_caps() method and is
> able to override the generic DMA-device capabilities.

I thought there is a pattern to return something, but it seems none.
So, I have nothing against it to return void.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

But consider one comment below.

> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
> Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru>
> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> 
> ---
> 
> Changelog v3:
> - This is a new patch created as a result of the discussion with Vinod and
>   Andy in the framework of DW DMA burst and LLP capabilities.
> ---
>  drivers/dma/dmaengine.c   | 3 +++
>  include/linux/dmaengine.h | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> index ad56ad58932c..edbb11d56cde 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> @@ -599,6 +599,9 @@ int dma_get_slave_caps(struct dma_chan *chan, struct dma_slave_caps *caps)
>  	caps->cmd_resume = !!device->device_resume;
>  	caps->cmd_terminate = !!device->device_terminate_all;
>  

Perhaps a comment to explain that this is channel specific correction /
override / you name it on top of device level capabilities?

> +	if (device->device_caps)
> +		device->device_caps(chan, caps);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_get_slave_caps);
> diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> index a7e4d8dfdd19..b303e59929e5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> @@ -899,6 +899,8 @@ struct dma_device {
>  		struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dst, u64 data,
>  		unsigned long flags);
>  
> +	void (*device_caps)(struct dma_chan *chan,
> +			    struct dma_slave_caps *caps);
>  	int (*device_config)(struct dma_chan *chan,
>  			     struct dma_slave_config *config);
>  	int (*device_pause)(struct dma_chan *chan);
> -- 
> 2.26.2
>
Serge Semin May 29, 2020, 2:07 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 03:12:03PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 01:23:55AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > There are DMA devices (like ours version of Synopsys DW DMAC) which have
> > DMA capabilities non-uniformly redistributed amongst the device channels.
> > In order to provide a way of exposing the channel-specific parameters to
> > the DMA engine consumers, we introduce a new DMA-device callback. In case
> > if provided it gets called from the dma_get_slave_caps() method and is
> > able to override the generic DMA-device capabilities.
> 
> I thought there is a pattern to return something, but it seems none.
> So, I have nothing against it to return void.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> 
> But consider one comment below.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
> > Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru>
> > Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> > Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Changelog v3:
> > - This is a new patch created as a result of the discussion with Vinod and
> >   Andy in the framework of DW DMA burst and LLP capabilities.
> > ---
> >  drivers/dma/dmaengine.c   | 3 +++
> >  include/linux/dmaengine.h | 2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> > index ad56ad58932c..edbb11d56cde 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> > @@ -599,6 +599,9 @@ int dma_get_slave_caps(struct dma_chan *chan, struct dma_slave_caps *caps)
> >  	caps->cmd_resume = !!device->device_resume;
> >  	caps->cmd_terminate = !!device->device_terminate_all;
> >  
> 

> Perhaps a comment to explain that this is channel specific correction /
> override / you name it on top of device level capabilities?
> 
> > +	if (device->device_caps)
> > +		device->device_caps(chan, caps);
> > +

Agreed. I also forgot to add a doc-comment above the struct dma_device
definition.

-Sergey 

> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_get_slave_caps);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> > index a7e4d8dfdd19..b303e59929e5 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> > @@ -899,6 +899,8 @@ struct dma_device {
> >  		struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dst, u64 data,
> >  		unsigned long flags);
> >  
> > +	void (*device_caps)(struct dma_chan *chan,
> > +			    struct dma_slave_caps *caps);
> >  	int (*device_config)(struct dma_chan *chan,
> >  			     struct dma_slave_config *config);
> >  	int (*device_pause)(struct dma_chan *chan);
> > -- 
> > 2.26.2
> > 
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> 
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
index ad56ad58932c..edbb11d56cde 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
@@ -599,6 +599,9 @@  int dma_get_slave_caps(struct dma_chan *chan, struct dma_slave_caps *caps)
 	caps->cmd_resume = !!device->device_resume;
 	caps->cmd_terminate = !!device->device_terminate_all;
 
+	if (device->device_caps)
+		device->device_caps(chan, caps);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_get_slave_caps);
diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
index a7e4d8dfdd19..b303e59929e5 100644
--- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
+++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
@@ -899,6 +899,8 @@  struct dma_device {
 		struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dst, u64 data,
 		unsigned long flags);
 
+	void (*device_caps)(struct dma_chan *chan,
+			    struct dma_slave_caps *caps);
 	int (*device_config)(struct dma_chan *chan,
 			     struct dma_slave_config *config);
 	int (*device_pause)(struct dma_chan *chan);