Message ID | 20230518152004.513675-1-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | d8fb35d80914846d25833a35acb211e59ee36046 |
Headers | show |
Series | dmaengine: sh: rz-dmac: Improve probe()/remove() | expand |
Hi Vinod, Gentle ping. Looks like it missed out. Anyway, I will rebase and Resend. Cheers, Biju > -----Original Message----- > From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> > Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2023 4:20 PM > To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>; Philipp Zabel > <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> > Cc: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>; Geert Uytterhoeven > <geert+renesas@glider.be>; Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev- > lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>; dmaengine@vger.kernel.org; Fabrizio Castro > <fabrizio.castro.jz@renesas.com>; linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org; > Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> > Subject: [PATCH] dmaengine: sh: rz-dmac: Improve probe()/remove() > > We usually do cleanup in reverse order of init. Currently, in case of > error, this is not followed in rz_dmac_probe() and similar case for > remove(). > > This patch improves error handling in probe() error path and in remove() > do cleanup in reverse order of init. > > Reported-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> > --- > drivers/dma/sh/rz-dmac.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/sh/rz-dmac.c b/drivers/dma/sh/rz-dmac.c index > 9479f29692d3..229f642fde6b 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/sh/rz-dmac.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/sh/rz-dmac.c > @@ -947,7 +947,6 @@ static int rz_dmac_probe(struct platform_device > *pdev) > dma_register_err: > of_dma_controller_free(pdev->dev.of_node); > err: > - reset_control_assert(dmac->rstc); > channel_num = i ? i - 1 : 0; > for (i = 0; i < channel_num; i++) { > struct rz_dmac_chan *channel = &dmac->channels[i]; @@ -958,6 > +957,7 @@ static int rz_dmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > channel->lmdesc.base_dma); > } > > + reset_control_assert(dmac->rstc); > err_pm_runtime_put: > pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev); > err_pm_disable: > @@ -971,6 +971,8 @@ static int rz_dmac_remove(struct platform_device > *pdev) > struct rz_dmac *dmac = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > unsigned int i; > > + dma_async_device_unregister(&dmac->engine); > + of_dma_controller_free(pdev->dev.of_node); > for (i = 0; i < dmac->n_channels; i++) { > struct rz_dmac_chan *channel = &dmac->channels[i]; > > @@ -979,8 +981,6 @@ static int rz_dmac_remove(struct platform_device > *pdev) > channel->lmdesc.base, > channel->lmdesc.base_dma); > } > - of_dma_controller_free(pdev->dev.of_node); > - dma_async_device_unregister(&dmac->engine); > reset_control_assert(dmac->rstc); > pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev); > pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev); > -- > 2.25.1
diff --git a/drivers/dma/sh/rz-dmac.c b/drivers/dma/sh/rz-dmac.c index 9479f29692d3..229f642fde6b 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/sh/rz-dmac.c +++ b/drivers/dma/sh/rz-dmac.c @@ -947,7 +947,6 @@ static int rz_dmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) dma_register_err: of_dma_controller_free(pdev->dev.of_node); err: - reset_control_assert(dmac->rstc); channel_num = i ? i - 1 : 0; for (i = 0; i < channel_num; i++) { struct rz_dmac_chan *channel = &dmac->channels[i]; @@ -958,6 +957,7 @@ static int rz_dmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) channel->lmdesc.base_dma); } + reset_control_assert(dmac->rstc); err_pm_runtime_put: pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev); err_pm_disable: @@ -971,6 +971,8 @@ static int rz_dmac_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) struct rz_dmac *dmac = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); unsigned int i; + dma_async_device_unregister(&dmac->engine); + of_dma_controller_free(pdev->dev.of_node); for (i = 0; i < dmac->n_channels; i++) { struct rz_dmac_chan *channel = &dmac->channels[i]; @@ -979,8 +981,6 @@ static int rz_dmac_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) channel->lmdesc.base, channel->lmdesc.base_dma); } - of_dma_controller_free(pdev->dev.of_node); - dma_async_device_unregister(&dmac->engine); reset_control_assert(dmac->rstc); pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev); pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
We usually do cleanup in reverse order of init. Currently, in case of error, this is not followed in rz_dmac_probe() and similar case for remove(). This patch improves error handling in probe() error path and in remove() do cleanup in reverse order of init. Reported-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> --- drivers/dma/sh/rz-dmac.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)