| Message ID | 56BCAF66.8010206@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Headers | show |
Hi Robin, Thanks for your update patch I will include it in my next version. But I'm sorry I do not understand, is your modification an addition or a substitution to your original patch? * Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> [2016-02-11 15:57:26 +0000]: > On 11/02/16 00:02, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >Hi Niklas, > > > >Thank you for the patch. > > > >On Wednesday 10 February 2016 01:57:51 Niklas Söderlund wrote: > >>From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> > >> > >>On some platforms, MMIO regions might need slightly different treatment > >>compared to mapping regular memory; add the notion of MMIO mappings to > >>the IOMMU API's memory type flags, so that callers can let the IOMMU > >>drivers know to do the right thing. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> > >>Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > > > >Answering the question from the cover letter, yes, it's totally fine to pick > >the ack, that's actually expected. > > > >>--- > >> drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 4 +++- > >> include/linux/iommu.h | 1 + > > > >You might be asked to split this patch in two. > > Worse than that, you might also be asked to fix it up when the silly author > remembers that he did this on a stage-2-only ARM SMMU, and the attributes > for the stage 1 tables that the IPMMU uses are in a different code path: > > --->8--- > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > index 5b5c299..7622c6e 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > @@ -354,7 +354,10 @@ static arm_lpae_iopte arm_lpae_prot_to_pte(struct > arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data, > if (!(prot & IOMMU_WRITE) && (prot & IOMMU_READ)) > pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_RDONLY; > > - if (prot & IOMMU_CACHE) > + if (prot & IOMMU_MMIO) > + pte |= (ARM_LPAE_MAIR_ATTR_IDX_DEV > + << ARM_LPAE_PTE_ATTRINDX_SHIFT); > + else if (prot & IOMMU_CACHE) > pte |= (ARM_LPAE_MAIR_ATTR_IDX_CACHE > << ARM_LPAE_PTE_ATTRINDX_SHIFT); > } else { > --->8--- > > Sorry for the bother, > Robin. > > >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >>diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > >>index 381ca5a..3ff4f87 100644 > >>--- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > >>+++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > >>@@ -364,7 +364,9 @@ static arm_lpae_iopte arm_lpae_prot_to_pte(struct > >>arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data, pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_HAP_READ; > >> if (prot & IOMMU_WRITE) > >> pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_HAP_WRITE; > >>- if (prot & IOMMU_CACHE) > >>+ if (prot & IOMMU_MMIO) > >>+ pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_MEMATTR_DEV; > >>+ else if (prot & IOMMU_CACHE) > >> pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_MEMATTR_OIWB; > >> else > >> pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_MEMATTR_NC; > >>diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h > >>index a5c539f..34b6432 100644 > >>--- a/include/linux/iommu.h > >>+++ b/include/linux/iommu.h > >>@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ > >> #define IOMMU_WRITE (1 << 1) > >> #define IOMMU_CACHE (1 << 2) /* DMA cache coherency */ > >> #define IOMMU_NOEXEC (1 << 3) > >>+#define IOMMU_MMIO (1 << 4) /* e.g. things like MSI doorbells */ > >> > >> struct iommu_ops; > >> struct iommu_group; > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 16/02/16 12:06, Niklas Söderlund wrote: > Hi Robin, > > Thanks for your update patch I will include it in my next version. But > I'm sorry I do not understand, is your modification an addition or a > substitution to your original patch? Apologies for being confusing - that was a diff on top of the existing patch, to be folded in. My original patch was only handling IOMMU_MMIO for stage 2 PTEs, so we also need the extra code to handle the different way of setting the appropriate memory type in stage 1 PTEs. Robin. > * Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> [2016-02-11 15:57:26 +0000]: > >> On 11/02/16 00:02, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>> Hi Niklas, >>> >>> Thank you for the patch. >>> >>> On Wednesday 10 February 2016 01:57:51 Niklas Söderlund wrote: >>>> From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> >>>> >>>> On some platforms, MMIO regions might need slightly different treatment >>>> compared to mapping regular memory; add the notion of MMIO mappings to >>>> the IOMMU API's memory type flags, so that callers can let the IOMMU >>>> drivers know to do the right thing. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> >>>> Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> >>> >>> Answering the question from the cover letter, yes, it's totally fine to pick >>> the ack, that's actually expected. >>> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 4 +++- >>>> include/linux/iommu.h | 1 + >>> >>> You might be asked to split this patch in two. >> >> Worse than that, you might also be asked to fix it up when the silly author >> remembers that he did this on a stage-2-only ARM SMMU, and the attributes >> for the stage 1 tables that the IPMMU uses are in a different code path: >> >> --->8--- >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c >> index 5b5c299..7622c6e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c >> @@ -354,7 +354,10 @@ static arm_lpae_iopte arm_lpae_prot_to_pte(struct >> arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data, >> if (!(prot & IOMMU_WRITE) && (prot & IOMMU_READ)) >> pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_RDONLY; >> >> - if (prot & IOMMU_CACHE) >> + if (prot & IOMMU_MMIO) >> + pte |= (ARM_LPAE_MAIR_ATTR_IDX_DEV >> + << ARM_LPAE_PTE_ATTRINDX_SHIFT); >> + else if (prot & IOMMU_CACHE) >> pte |= (ARM_LPAE_MAIR_ATTR_IDX_CACHE >> << ARM_LPAE_PTE_ATTRINDX_SHIFT); >> } else { >> --->8--- >> >> Sorry for the bother, >> Robin. >> >>>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c >>>> index 381ca5a..3ff4f87 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c >>>> @@ -364,7 +364,9 @@ static arm_lpae_iopte arm_lpae_prot_to_pte(struct >>>> arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data, pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_HAP_READ; >>>> if (prot & IOMMU_WRITE) >>>> pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_HAP_WRITE; >>>> - if (prot & IOMMU_CACHE) >>>> + if (prot & IOMMU_MMIO) >>>> + pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_MEMATTR_DEV; >>>> + else if (prot & IOMMU_CACHE) >>>> pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_MEMATTR_OIWB; >>>> else >>>> pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_MEMATTR_NC; >>>> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h >>>> index a5c539f..34b6432 100644 >>>> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h >>>> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h >>>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ >>>> #define IOMMU_WRITE (1 << 1) >>>> #define IOMMU_CACHE (1 << 2) /* DMA cache coherency */ >>>> #define IOMMU_NOEXEC (1 << 3) >>>> +#define IOMMU_MMIO (1 << 4) /* e.g. things like MSI doorbells */ >>>> >>>> struct iommu_ops; >>>> struct iommu_group; >>> >> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> [2016-02-16 12:43:40 +0000]: > On 16/02/16 12:06, Niklas Söderlund wrote: > >Hi Robin, > > > >Thanks for your update patch I will include it in my next version. But > >I'm sorry I do not understand, is your modification an addition or a > >substitution to your original patch? > > Apologies for being confusing - that was a diff on top of the existing > patch, to be folded in. My original patch was only handling IOMMU_MMIO for > stage 2 PTEs, so we also need the extra code to handle the different way of > setting the appropriate memory type in stage 1 PTEs. That's what I though but wanted to be clear, thanks for clarifying. I will fold the diff into your patch and keep your SoB line and send it out with my series, hope that's a OK way for me to handle it. Once more thanks for your patch and feedback. > > Robin. > > >* Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> [2016-02-11 15:57:26 +0000]: > > > >>On 11/02/16 00:02, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>>Hi Niklas, > >>> > >>>Thank you for the patch. > >>> > >>>On Wednesday 10 February 2016 01:57:51 Niklas Söderlund wrote: > >>>>From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> > >>>> > >>>>On some platforms, MMIO regions might need slightly different treatment > >>>>compared to mapping regular memory; add the notion of MMIO mappings to > >>>>the IOMMU API's memory type flags, so that callers can let the IOMMU > >>>>drivers know to do the right thing. > >>>> > >>>>Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> > >>>>Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > >>> > >>>Answering the question from the cover letter, yes, it's totally fine to pick > >>>the ack, that's actually expected. > >>> > >>>>--- > >>>> drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 4 +++- > >>>> include/linux/iommu.h | 1 + > >>> > >>>You might be asked to split this patch in two. > >> > >>Worse than that, you might also be asked to fix it up when the silly author > >>remembers that he did this on a stage-2-only ARM SMMU, and the attributes > >>for the stage 1 tables that the IPMMU uses are in a different code path: > >> > >>--->8--- > >>diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > >>index 5b5c299..7622c6e 100644 > >>--- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > >>+++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > >>@@ -354,7 +354,10 @@ static arm_lpae_iopte arm_lpae_prot_to_pte(struct > >>arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data, > >> if (!(prot & IOMMU_WRITE) && (prot & IOMMU_READ)) > >> pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_RDONLY; > >> > >>- if (prot & IOMMU_CACHE) > >>+ if (prot & IOMMU_MMIO) > >>+ pte |= (ARM_LPAE_MAIR_ATTR_IDX_DEV > >>+ << ARM_LPAE_PTE_ATTRINDX_SHIFT); > >>+ else if (prot & IOMMU_CACHE) > >> pte |= (ARM_LPAE_MAIR_ATTR_IDX_CACHE > >> << ARM_LPAE_PTE_ATTRINDX_SHIFT); > >> } else { > >>--->8--- > >> > >>Sorry for the bother, > >>Robin. > >> > >>>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>>> > >>>>diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > >>>>index 381ca5a..3ff4f87 100644 > >>>>--- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > >>>>+++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c > >>>>@@ -364,7 +364,9 @@ static arm_lpae_iopte arm_lpae_prot_to_pte(struct > >>>>arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data, pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_HAP_READ; > >>>> if (prot & IOMMU_WRITE) > >>>> pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_HAP_WRITE; > >>>>- if (prot & IOMMU_CACHE) > >>>>+ if (prot & IOMMU_MMIO) > >>>>+ pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_MEMATTR_DEV; > >>>>+ else if (prot & IOMMU_CACHE) > >>>> pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_MEMATTR_OIWB; > >>>> else > >>>> pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_MEMATTR_NC; > >>>>diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h > >>>>index a5c539f..34b6432 100644 > >>>>--- a/include/linux/iommu.h > >>>>+++ b/include/linux/iommu.h > >>>>@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ > >>>> #define IOMMU_WRITE (1 << 1) > >>>> #define IOMMU_CACHE (1 << 2) /* DMA cache coherency */ > >>>> #define IOMMU_NOEXEC (1 << 3) > >>>>+#define IOMMU_MMIO (1 << 4) /* e.g. things like MSI doorbells */ > >>>> > >>>> struct iommu_ops; > >>>> struct iommu_group; > >>> > >> > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c index 5b5c299..7622c6e 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c @@ -354,7 +354,10 @@ static arm_lpae_iopte arm_lpae_prot_to_pte(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data, if (!(prot & IOMMU_WRITE) && (prot & IOMMU_READ)) pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_RDONLY; - if (prot & IOMMU_CACHE) + if (prot & IOMMU_MMIO) + pte |= (ARM_LPAE_MAIR_ATTR_IDX_DEV + << ARM_LPAE_PTE_ATTRINDX_SHIFT); + else if (prot & IOMMU_CACHE) pte |= (ARM_LPAE_MAIR_ATTR_IDX_CACHE << ARM_LPAE_PTE_ATTRINDX_SHIFT);