From patchwork Thu Feb 11 09:12:41 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Gustavo Pimentel X-Patchwork-Id: 12082629 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05BE4C433E0 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD31E64E7D for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230332AbhBKJVm (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 04:21:42 -0500 Received: from smtprelay-out1.synopsys.com ([149.117.87.133]:56814 "EHLO smtprelay-out1.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230110AbhBKJON (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 04:14:13 -0500 Received: from mailhost.synopsys.com (mdc-mailhost2.synopsys.com [10.225.0.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtprelay-out1.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CA82C00C1; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:13:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=synopsys.com; s=mail; t=1613034783; bh=rP7FcyZIb2UiEc7bBGnoSeIkNGnft9AjTq7ZKuTESmg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To: References:From; b=EWBNZ5bl0UpZzXtqr5G0ycKrXG/UEhfWAAygmjT6CAY47zNjbFr9Zd4JEfbtJYg0G nkgf2QMJUCWWGywt9JmAcJ27+5xm5mt9zhBLe/23caWmzp4Ch30qnH1urYjiNDGVLj ltFILRe+BwnZBXvfxp3VKBgElZZyA7kFvIDxlZZvNOCjf+HiU1EWBz8nZYc1VhI2SI 3kb7xxGsl6FsrJ915trrBNKG1HDGbzviUPp6utkcIeL51MHqyJFusCnSYye/KzF83O UOztRN6BGSR9JIvpxBxgLn2kKEX8s10aAk3JpjpJvpolcE3mpLuAoeojvIme7hbDMZ D4NC/0lv1u+Hg== Received: from de02dwia024.internal.synopsys.com (de02dwia024.internal.synopsys.com [10.225.19.81]) by mailhost.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23876A0061; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:13:02 +0000 (UTC) X-SNPS-Relay: synopsys.com From: Gustavo Pimentel To: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vinod Koul , Dan Williams , Bjorn Helgaas , Gustavo Pimentel Subject: [PATCH v5 08/15] dmaengine: dw-edma: Reorder variables to keep consistency Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:12:41 +0100 Message-Id: <61fe6e8555bfd8eb53fd104ebafb6ac2de3def59.1613034728.git.gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org In the driver code structure, I tried to keep the code style consistency by writing the write channels instructions first, and then follow by the read channels instructions, mimicking the hardware implementation. However, this code style failed in some cases. This patch fixes that and no functional changes are expected. Signed-off-by: Gustavo Pimentel --- drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c index 7077d79..9e79eb5 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ #define DW_PCIE_VSEC_DMA_ID 0x6 #define DW_PCIE_VSEC_DMA_BAR GENMASK(10, 8) #define DW_PCIE_VSEC_DMA_MAP GENMASK(2, 0) -#define DW_PCIE_VSEC_DMA_RD_CH GENMASK(25, 16) #define DW_PCIE_VSEC_DMA_WR_CH GENMASK(9, 0) +#define DW_PCIE_VSEC_DMA_RD_CH GENMASK(25, 16) struct dw_edma_pcie_data { /* eDMA registers location */ @@ -39,8 +39,8 @@ struct dw_edma_pcie_data { /* Other */ enum dw_edma_map_format mf; u8 irqs; - u16 rd_ch_cnt; u16 wr_ch_cnt; + u16 rd_ch_cnt; }; static const struct dw_edma_pcie_data snps_edda_data = { @@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ static const struct dw_edma_pcie_data snps_edda_data = { /* Other */ .mf = EDMA_MF_EDMA_UNROLL, .irqs = 1, - .rd_ch_cnt = 0, .wr_ch_cnt = 0, + .rd_ch_cnt = 0, }; static int dw_edma_pcie_irq_vector(struct device *dev, unsigned int nr) @@ -99,8 +99,8 @@ static void dw_edma_pcie_get_vsec_dma_data(struct pci_dev *pdev, pdata->rg_bar = FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_VSEC_DMA_BAR, val); pci_read_config_dword(pdev, vsec + 0xc, &val); - pdata->rd_ch_cnt = FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_VSEC_DMA_RD_CH, val); pdata->wr_ch_cnt = FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_VSEC_DMA_WR_CH, val); + pdata->rd_ch_cnt = FIELD_GET(DW_PCIE_VSEC_DMA_RD_CH, val); pci_read_config_dword(pdev, vsec + 0x14, &val); off = val; @@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, dw->mf = vsec_data.mf; dw->nr_irqs = nr_irqs; dw->ops = &dw_edma_pcie_core_ops; - dw->rd_ch_cnt = vsec_data.rd_ch_cnt; dw->wr_ch_cnt = vsec_data.wr_ch_cnt; + dw->rd_ch_cnt = vsec_data.rd_ch_cnt; /* Debug info */ if (dw->mf == EDMA_MF_EDMA_LEGACY)