Message ID | 9d92b3c0f9304e3f2892833a70c726b911b29fd8.1597327637.git.gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Headers | show |
Series | dmaengine: dw-edma: Fix linked list physical address calculation on non-64 bits architectures | expand |
Hi Gustavo, I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on vkoul-dmaengine/next] [also build test WARNING on v5.8 next-20200813] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Gustavo-Pimentel/dmaengine-dw-edma-Fix-linked-list-physical-address-calculation-on-non-64-bits-architectures/20200813-221607 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vkoul/dmaengine.git next config: x86_64-randconfig-m001-20200811 (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0 If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> smatch warnings: drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c:233 dw_edma_v0_core_write_chunk() warn: inconsistent indenting drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c:266 dw_edma_v0_core_start() warn: inconsistent indenting vim +233 drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 191 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 192 static void dw_edma_v0_core_write_chunk(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk) 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 193 { 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 194 struct dw_edma_burst *child; 756c3ef93492af Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 195 struct dw_edma_v0_lli __iomem *lli; 756c3ef93492af Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 196 struct dw_edma_v0_llp __iomem *llp; 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 197 u32 control = 0, i = 0; 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 198 int j; 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 199 756c3ef93492af Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 200 lli = chunk->ll_region.vaddr; 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 201 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 202 if (chunk->cb) 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 203 control = DW_EDMA_V0_CB; 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 204 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 205 j = chunk->bursts_alloc; 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 206 list_for_each_entry(child, &chunk->burst->list, list) { 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 207 j--; 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 208 if (!j) 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 209 control |= (DW_EDMA_V0_LIE | DW_EDMA_V0_RIE); 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 210 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 211 /* Channel control */ 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 212 SET_LL(&lli[i].control, control); 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 213 /* Transfer size */ 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 214 SET_LL(&lli[i].transfer_size, child->sz); 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 215 /* SAR - low, high */ 6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 216 SET_LL(&lli[i].sar_low, lower_32_bits(child->sar)); 6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 217 SET_LL(&lli[i].sar_high, upper_32_bits(child->sar)); 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 218 /* DAR - low, high */ 6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 219 SET_LL(&lli[i].dar_low, lower_32_bits(child->dar)); 6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 220 SET_LL(&lli[i].dar_high, upper_32_bits(child->dar)); 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 221 i++; 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 222 } 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 223 756c3ef93492af Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 224 llp = (void __iomem *)&lli[i]; 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 225 control = DW_EDMA_V0_LLP | DW_EDMA_V0_TCB; 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 226 if (!chunk->cb) 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 227 control |= DW_EDMA_V0_CB; 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 228 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 229 /* Channel control */ 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 230 SET_LL(&llp->control, control); 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 231 /* Linked list - low, high */ c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 232 #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT 6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 @233 SET_LL(&llp->llp_low, lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); 6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 234 SET_LL(&llp->llp_high, upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 235 #else /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT */ c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 236 SET_LL(&llp->llp_low, chunk->ll_region.paddr); c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 237 SET_LL(&llp->llp_high, 0x0); c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 238 #endif /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT */ 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 239 } 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 240 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 241 void dw_edma_v0_core_start(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk, bool first) 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 242 { 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 243 struct dw_edma_chan *chan = chunk->chan; 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 244 struct dw_edma *dw = chan->chip->dw; 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 245 u32 tmp; 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 246 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 247 dw_edma_v0_core_write_chunk(chunk); 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 248 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 249 if (first) { 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 250 /* Enable engine */ 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 251 SET_RW(dw, chan->dir, engine_en, BIT(0)); 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 252 /* Interrupt unmask - done, abort */ 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 253 tmp = GET_RW(dw, chan->dir, int_mask); 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 254 tmp &= ~FIELD_PREP(EDMA_V0_DONE_INT_MASK, BIT(chan->id)); 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 255 tmp &= ~FIELD_PREP(EDMA_V0_ABORT_INT_MASK, BIT(chan->id)); 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 256 SET_RW(dw, chan->dir, int_mask, tmp); 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 257 /* Linked list error */ 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 258 tmp = GET_RW(dw, chan->dir, linked_list_err_en); 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 259 tmp |= FIELD_PREP(EDMA_V0_LINKED_LIST_ERR_MASK, BIT(chan->id)); 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 260 SET_RW(dw, chan->dir, linked_list_err_en, tmp); 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 261 /* Channel control */ 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 262 SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, ch_control1, 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 263 (DW_EDMA_V0_CCS | DW_EDMA_V0_LLE)); 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 264 /* Linked list - low, high */ c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 265 #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT 6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 @266 SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_low, 6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 267 lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); 6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 268 SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_high, 6f4722b1d1ebf2 Arnd Bergmann 2019-07-22 269 upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 270 #else /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT */ c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 271 SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_low, c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 272 chunk->ll_region.paddr); c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 273 SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_high, 0x0); c6442f1a5db52e Gustavo Pimentel 2020-08-13 274 #endif /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT*/ 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 275 } 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 276 /* Doorbell */ 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 277 SET_RW(dw, chan->dir, doorbell, 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 278 FIELD_PREP(EDMA_V0_DOORBELL_CH_MASK, chan->id)); 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 279 } 7e4b8a4fbe2cec Gustavo Pimentel 2019-06-04 280 --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
On 13-08-20, 16:13, Gustavo Pimentel wrote: > Fix linked list physical address calculation on non-64 bits architectures. > > The paddr variable is phys_addr_t type, which can assume a different > type (u64 or u32) depending on the conditional compilation flag > CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT. > > Since this variable is used in with upper_32 bits() macro to get the > value from 32 to 63 bits, on a non-64 bits architecture this variable > will assume a u32 type, it can cause a compilation warning. > > This issue was reported by a Coverity analysis. > > Fixes: 7e4b8a4fbe2c ("dmaengine: Add Synopsys eDMA IP version 0 support") > > Cc: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com> > --- > drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c > index 692de47..cfabbf5 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c > @@ -229,8 +229,13 @@ static void dw_edma_v0_core_write_chunk(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk) > /* Channel control */ > SET_LL(&llp->control, control); > /* Linked list - low, high */ > - SET_LL(&llp->llp_low, lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > - SET_LL(&llp->llp_high, upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > + #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT > + SET_LL(&llp->llp_low, lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > + SET_LL(&llp->llp_high, upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > + #else /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT */ > + SET_LL(&llp->llp_low, chunk->ll_region.paddr); > + SET_LL(&llp->llp_high, 0x0); Shouldn't upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr) return zero for non 64bit archs? > + #endif /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT */ > } > > void dw_edma_v0_core_start(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk, bool first) > @@ -257,10 +262,16 @@ void dw_edma_v0_core_start(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk, bool first) > SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, ch_control1, > (DW_EDMA_V0_CCS | DW_EDMA_V0_LLE)); > /* Linked list - low, high */ > - SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_low, > - lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > - SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_high, > - upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > + #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT > + SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_low, > + lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > + SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_high, > + upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > + #else /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT */ > + SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_low, > + chunk->ll_region.paddr); > + SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_high, 0x0); > + #endif /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT*/ > } > /* Doorbell */ > SET_RW(dw, chan->dir, doorbell, > -- > 2.7.4
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:9:37, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> wrote: > On 13-08-20, 16:13, Gustavo Pimentel wrote: > > Fix linked list physical address calculation on non-64 bits architectures. > > > > The paddr variable is phys_addr_t type, which can assume a different > > type (u64 or u32) depending on the conditional compilation flag > > CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT. > > > > Since this variable is used in with upper_32 bits() macro to get the > > value from 32 to 63 bits, on a non-64 bits architecture this variable > > will assume a u32 type, it can cause a compilation warning. > > > > This issue was reported by a Coverity analysis. > > > > Fixes: 7e4b8a4fbe2c ("dmaengine: Add Synopsys eDMA IP version 0 support") > > > > Cc: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com> > > --- > > drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c > > index 692de47..cfabbf5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c > > +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c > > @@ -229,8 +229,13 @@ static void dw_edma_v0_core_write_chunk(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk) > > /* Channel control */ > > SET_LL(&llp->control, control); > > /* Linked list - low, high */ > > - SET_LL(&llp->llp_low, lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > > - SET_LL(&llp->llp_high, upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > > + #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT > > + SET_LL(&llp->llp_low, lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > > + SET_LL(&llp->llp_high, upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > > + #else /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT */ > > + SET_LL(&llp->llp_low, chunk->ll_region.paddr); > > + SET_LL(&llp->llp_high, 0x0); > > Shouldn't upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr) return zero for non > 64bit archs? At the time when I made this patch, I got a compiler warning about the u32 vs u64 type mixing (phys_addr_t) and the macro usage upper_32 bits() on non-64 bits architectures. That's why I made this patch, but now I don't see this warning anymore. Vinod, please disregard this patch. -Gustavo > > > + #endif /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT */ > > } > > > > void dw_edma_v0_core_start(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk, bool first) > > @@ -257,10 +262,16 @@ void dw_edma_v0_core_start(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk, bool first) > > SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, ch_control1, > > (DW_EDMA_V0_CCS | DW_EDMA_V0_LLE)); > > /* Linked list - low, high */ > > - SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_low, > > - lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > > - SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_high, > > - upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > > + #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT > > + SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_low, > > + lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > > + SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_high, > > + upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > > + #else /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT */ > > + SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_low, > > + chunk->ll_region.paddr); > > + SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_high, 0x0); > > + #endif /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT*/ > > } > > /* Doorbell */ > > SET_RW(dw, chan->dir, doorbell, > > -- > > 2.7.4 > > -- > ~Vinod
On 26-08-20, 12:31, Gustavo Pimentel wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:9:37, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> wrote: > > > On 13-08-20, 16:13, Gustavo Pimentel wrote: > > > Fix linked list physical address calculation on non-64 bits architectures. > > > > > > The paddr variable is phys_addr_t type, which can assume a different > > > type (u64 or u32) depending on the conditional compilation flag > > > CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT. > > > > > > Since this variable is used in with upper_32 bits() macro to get the > > > value from 32 to 63 bits, on a non-64 bits architecture this variable > > > will assume a u32 type, it can cause a compilation warning. > > > > > > This issue was reported by a Coverity analysis. > > > > > > Fixes: 7e4b8a4fbe2c ("dmaengine: Add Synopsys eDMA IP version 0 support") > > > > > > Cc: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com> > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c > > > index 692de47..cfabbf5 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c > > > +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c > > > @@ -229,8 +229,13 @@ static void dw_edma_v0_core_write_chunk(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk) > > > /* Channel control */ > > > SET_LL(&llp->control, control); > > > /* Linked list - low, high */ > > > - SET_LL(&llp->llp_low, lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > > > - SET_LL(&llp->llp_high, upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > > > + #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT > > > + SET_LL(&llp->llp_low, lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > > > + SET_LL(&llp->llp_high, upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); > > > + #else /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT */ > > > + SET_LL(&llp->llp_low, chunk->ll_region.paddr); > > > + SET_LL(&llp->llp_high, 0x0); > > > > Shouldn't upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr) return zero for non > > 64bit archs? > > At the time when I made this patch, I got a compiler warning about the > u32 vs u64 type mixing (phys_addr_t) and the macro usage upper_32 bits() > on non-64 bits architectures. That's why I made this patch, but now I > don't see this warning anymore. > > Vinod, please disregard this patch. Ok dropped
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c index 692de47..cfabbf5 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c @@ -229,8 +229,13 @@ static void dw_edma_v0_core_write_chunk(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk) /* Channel control */ SET_LL(&llp->control, control); /* Linked list - low, high */ - SET_LL(&llp->llp_low, lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); - SET_LL(&llp->llp_high, upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); + #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT + SET_LL(&llp->llp_low, lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); + SET_LL(&llp->llp_high, upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); + #else /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT */ + SET_LL(&llp->llp_low, chunk->ll_region.paddr); + SET_LL(&llp->llp_high, 0x0); + #endif /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT */ } void dw_edma_v0_core_start(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk, bool first) @@ -257,10 +262,16 @@ void dw_edma_v0_core_start(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk, bool first) SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, ch_control1, (DW_EDMA_V0_CCS | DW_EDMA_V0_LLE)); /* Linked list - low, high */ - SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_low, - lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); - SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_high, - upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); + #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT + SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_low, + lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); + SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_high, + upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr)); + #else /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT */ + SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_low, + chunk->ll_region.paddr); + SET_CH(dw, chan->dir, chan->id, llp_high, 0x0); + #endif /* CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT*/ } /* Doorbell */ SET_RW(dw, chan->dir, doorbell,
Fix linked list physical address calculation on non-64 bits architectures. The paddr variable is phys_addr_t type, which can assume a different type (u64 or u32) depending on the conditional compilation flag CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT. Since this variable is used in with upper_32 bits() macro to get the value from 32 to 63 bits, on a non-64 bits architecture this variable will assume a u32 type, it can cause a compilation warning. This issue was reported by a Coverity analysis. Fixes: 7e4b8a4fbe2c ("dmaengine: Add Synopsys eDMA IP version 0 support") Cc: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com> --- drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)