Message ID | 1598357182-4226-1-git-send-email-yash.shah@sifive.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | SiFive DDR controller and EDAC support | expand |
On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 05:06:19 PDT (-0700), yash.shah@sifive.com wrote: > The series add supports for SiFive DDR controller driver. This driver > is use to manage the Cadence DDR controller present in SiFive SoCs. > Currently it manages only the EDAC feature of the DDR controller. > The series also adds Memory controller EDAC support for SiFive platform. > It register for notifier event from SiFive DDR controller driver. > > The series is tested and based on Linux v5.8. > > For testing on Hifive Unleashed: > 1. Enable the ECC bit of DDR controller during DDR initialization > 2. Erase the entire DRAM in bootloader stage > 3. Using FWC feature of DDR controller force ecc error to test > > Yash Shah (3): > dt-bindings: riscv: Add DT documentation for DDR Controller in SiFive > SoCs > soc: sifive: Add SiFive specific Cadence DDR controller driver > edac: sifive: Add EDAC support for Memory Controller in SiFive SoCs > > .../devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-ddr.yaml | 41 ++++ > drivers/edac/Kconfig | 2 +- > drivers/edac/sifive_edac.c | 117 ++++++++++++ > drivers/soc/sifive/Kconfig | 6 + > drivers/soc/sifive/Makefile | 3 +- > drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ddr.c | 207 +++++++++++++++++++++ > include/soc/sifive/sifive_ddr.h | 73 ++++++++ > 7 files changed, 447 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-ddr.yaml > create mode 100644 drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ddr.c > create mode 100644 include/soc/sifive/sifive_ddr.h Thanks. These look good to me and I'm happy to take them through the RISC-V tree, but I'm going to wait for a bit to see if there are any comments from the maintainers of the various subsystems before doing so.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 09:02:54AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > Thanks. These look good to me and I'm happy to take them through the RISC-V > tree, but I'm going to wait for a bit to see if there are any comments from the > maintainers of the various subsystems before doing so. I'll have a look at the EDAC bits these days and give you an ACK if they're ok. Thx.
On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:19:58 PDT (-0700), bp@alien8.de wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 09:02:54AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >> Thanks. These look good to me and I'm happy to take them through the RISC-V >> tree, but I'm going to wait for a bit to see if there are any comments from the >> maintainers of the various subsystems before doing so. > > I'll have a look at the EDAC bits these days and give you an ACK if > they're ok. Thanks!