[0/3] Cleanup mce_notify_irq usage

Message

Nikolay Borisov Jan. 14, 2025, 4:37 p.m. UTC

Here are 3 small patches that result in mce_notify_irq becoming private to core.c
and unexporting it. I have one pending question that I've put under the scissor
line in Patch 3. But overall they are pretty self-explanatory and obvious.

Nikolay Borisov (3):
  x86/mce/inject: Remova call to mce_notify_irq()
  x86/mce: Make mce_notify_irq() static
  x86/mce: Make mce_notify_irq() depend on CONFIG_X86_MCELOG_LEGACY

 arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h       |  2 --
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c   | 44 +++++++++++++++++---------------
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/inject.c |  1 -
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

--
2.43.0

Comments

Zhuo, Qiuxu Jan. 15, 2025, 6:37 a.m. UTC | #1

> From: Nikolay Borisov <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2025 12:37 AM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Nikolay
> Borisov <[e-mail]>
> Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Cleanup mce_notify_irq usage

I tried to apply this series on top of the ras/core branch of the TIP tree, but there were some conflicts. 
Would it be better to rebase this series on top of the ras/core branch of the TIP tree?

  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git   ras/core

Nikolay Borisov Jan. 15, 2025, 6:59 a.m. UTC | #2

On 15.01.25 г. 8:37 ч., Zhuo, Qiuxu wrote:
>> From: Nikolay Borisov <[e-mail]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2025 12:37 AM
>> To: [e-mail]
>> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Nikolay
>> Borisov <[e-mail]>
>> Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Cleanup mce_notify_irq usage
> 
> I tried to apply this series on top of the ras/core branch of the TIP tree, but there were some conflicts.
> Would it be better to rebase this series on top of the ras/core branch of the TIP tree?
> 
>    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git   ras/core


Sure, will do. It's based off master curently