| Message ID | 20191128125406.10417-4-info@metux.net (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/6] include: linux: pci.h: introduce pci_get_device_by_id() | expand |
On 28.11.19 13:54:04, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > Use the new pci_get_device_by_id() helper in order to reduce > a bit of boilerplate. > - while (mci_pdev == NULL && id->vendor != 0) { > - mci_pdev = pci_get_device(id->vendor, > - id->device, NULL); > + while (mci_pdev == NULL && i82443bxgx_pci_tbl[i].vendor) { > + mci_pdev = pci_get_device_by_id( > + &i82443bxgx_pci_tbl[i]); I don't see how this is less boilerplate. Since this differs from the typical pattern for this it is less readable now. -Robert
diff --git a/drivers/edac/i82443bxgx_edac.c b/drivers/edac/i82443bxgx_edac.c index a2ca929e2168..c01f51a4848c 100644 --- a/drivers/edac/i82443bxgx_edac.c +++ b/drivers/edac/i82443bxgx_edac.c @@ -407,15 +407,13 @@ static int __init i82443bxgx_edacmc_init(void) goto fail0; if (mci_pdev == NULL) { - const struct pci_device_id *id = &i82443bxgx_pci_tbl[0]; int i = 0; i82443bxgx_registered = 0; - while (mci_pdev == NULL && id->vendor != 0) { - mci_pdev = pci_get_device(id->vendor, - id->device, NULL); + while (mci_pdev == NULL && i82443bxgx_pci_tbl[i].vendor) { + mci_pdev = pci_get_device_by_id( + &i82443bxgx_pci_tbl[i]); i++; - id = &i82443bxgx_pci_tbl[i]; } if (!mci_pdev) { edac_dbg(0, "i82443bxgx pci_get_device fail\n");
Use the new pci_get_device_by_id() helper in order to reduce a bit of boilerplate. Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net> --- drivers/edac/i82443bxgx_edac.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)