| Message ID | 20220909053839.2293-1-yuzhe@nfschina.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | EDAC/altera: add platform_get_irq error checking | expand |
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 01:38:38PM +0800, Yu Zhe wrote: > The platform_get_irq() function returns negative error codes on error, > check it. > > Signed-off-by: Yu Zhe <yuzhe@nfschina.com> > --- > drivers/edac/altera_edac.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c > index e7e8e624a436..79c7c97c7a46 100644 > --- a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c > +++ b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c > @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ static int altr_sdram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > /* Arria10 has a 2nd IRQ */ > irq2 = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1); > + if (irq2 < 0) > + return irq2; This will break the driver. Only certain hardware has the second IRQ. (Read the comments later in the probe). In fact, the code works fine as-is because devm_request_irq() will fail later if this IRQ is required. This code is not beautiful. It should only request the IRQ in cases where it is present, but it used to work correctly and now it will be broken. regards, dan carpenter
diff --git a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c index e7e8e624a436..79c7c97c7a46 100644 --- a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c +++ b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ static int altr_sdram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* Arria10 has a 2nd IRQ */ irq2 = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1); + if (irq2 < 0) + return irq2; layers[0].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHIP_SELECT; layers[0].size = 1;
The platform_get_irq() function returns negative error codes on error, check it. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhe <yuzhe@nfschina.com> --- drivers/edac/altera_edac.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)