@@ -2970,7 +2970,7 @@ unsigned long dispc_fclk_rate(void)
switch (dss_get_dispc_clk_source()) {
case OMAP_DSS_CLK_SRC_FCK:
- r = clk_get_rate(dispc.dss_clk);
+ r = dss_get_dispc_clk_rate();
break;
case OMAP_DSS_CLK_SRC_DSI_PLL_HSDIV_DISPC:
dsidev = dsi_get_dsidev_from_id(0);
@@ -3002,7 +3002,7 @@ unsigned long dispc_mgr_lclk_rate(enum omap_channel channel)
switch (dss_get_lcd_clk_source(channel)) {
case OMAP_DSS_CLK_SRC_FCK:
- r = clk_get_rate(dispc.dss_clk);
+ r = dss_get_dispc_clk_rate();
break;
case OMAP_DSS_CLK_SRC_DSI_PLL_HSDIV_DISPC:
dsidev = dsi_get_dsidev_from_id(0);
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static struct {
struct clk *dpll4_m4_ck;
struct clk *dss_clk;
+ unsigned long dss_clk_rate;
unsigned long cache_req_pck;
unsigned long cache_prate;
@@ -489,6 +490,10 @@ int dss_set_clock_div(struct dss_clock_info *cinfo)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ dss.dss_clk_rate = clk_get_rate(dss.dss_clk);
+
+ WARN_ONCE(dss.dss_clk_rate != cinfo->fck, "clk rate mismatch");
+
DSSDBG("fck = %ld (%d)\n", cinfo->fck, cinfo->fck_div);
return 0;
@@ -502,6 +507,11 @@ unsigned long dss_get_dpll4_rate(void)
return 0;
}
+unsigned long dss_get_dispc_clk_rate(void)
+{
+ return dss.dss_clk_rate;
+}
+
static int dss_setup_default_clock(void)
{
unsigned long max_dss_fck, prate;
@@ -953,6 +963,8 @@ static int __init omap_dsshw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (r)
goto err_runtime_get;
+ dss.dss_clk_rate = clk_get_rate(dss.dss_clk);
+
/* Select DPLL */
REG_FLD_MOD(DSS_CONTROL, 0, 0, 0);
@@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ void dss_overlay_kobj_uninit(struct omap_overlay *ovl);
int dss_init_platform_driver(void) __init;
void dss_uninit_platform_driver(void);
+unsigned long dss_get_dispc_clk_rate(void);
int dss_dpi_select_source(enum omap_channel channel);
void dss_select_hdmi_venc_clk_source(enum dss_hdmi_venc_clk_source_select);
enum dss_hdmi_venc_clk_source_select dss_get_hdmi_venc_clk_source(void);
Dispc currently gets dispc's fck with clk_get() and uses clk_get_rate() to get the rate for scaling calculations. This causes a problem with common clock framework, as omapdss uses the dispc functions inside a spinlock, and common clock framework uses a mutex in clk_get_rate(). Looking at the DSS clock tree, the above use of the dispc fck is not quite correct. The DSS_FCLK from PRCM goes to DSS core block, which has a mux to select the clock for DISPC from various options, so the current use of dispc fck bypasses that. Fortunately we never change the dispc clock mux for now. To fix the issue with clk_get_rate(), this patch caches the dss clock rate in dss.c when it is set. Dispc will then ask for the clock rate from dss. While this is not very elegant, it does fix the issue, and it's not totally wrong when considering that the dispc fck actually comes via dss. In the future we should probably look into common clock framework and see if that could be used to represent the DSS clock tree properly. Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> --- drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c | 4 ++-- drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.c | 12 ++++++++++++ drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)