| Message ID | 1447664207-24370-3-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi Boris (Adding Ariel for pwm-lpc18xx-sct) On 16 November 2015 at 09:56, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote: > Use pwm_get_xxx() helpers instead of directly accessing the pwm->xxx field. > Doing that will ease adaptation of the PWM framework to support atomic > update. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> > --- > Patch generated with the following coccinelle script: > > --->8--- > virtual patch > > @@ > struct pwm_device *p; > expression e; > @@ > ( > -(p)->polarity = e; > +pwm_set_polarity((p), e); > | > -(p)->polarity > +pwm_get_polarity((p)) > | > -(p)->period = e; > +pwm_set_period((p), e); > | > -(p)->period > +pwm_get_period((p)) > | > -(p)->duty_cycle = e; > +pwm_set_duty_cycle((p), e); > | > -(p)->duty_cycle > +pwm_get_duty_cycle((p)) > ) > --->8--- > --- > drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c | 2 +- > drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c > index 7101c70..2f88543 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static int crc_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *c, struct pwm_device *pwm, > return -EINVAL; > } > > - if (pwm->period != period_ns) { > + if (pwm_get_period((pwm)) != period_ns) { > int clk_div; > > /* changing the clk divisor, need to disable fisrt */ > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c > index 9163085..091fa13 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c > @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int lpc18xx_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) > LPC18XX_PWM_EVSTATEMSK(lpc18xx_data->duty_event), > LPC18XX_PWM_EVSTATEMSK_ALL); > > - if (pwm->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL) { > + if (pwm_get_polarity((pwm)) == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL) { What is the deal with the double parentheses? Think I saw that in some of the other patches as well. regards, Joachim Eastwood -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Joachim, On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:46:44 +0100 Joachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Boris > > (Adding Ariel for pwm-lpc18xx-sct) > > On 16 November 2015 at 09:56, Boris Brezillon > <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > Use pwm_get_xxx() helpers instead of directly accessing the pwm->xxx field. > > Doing that will ease adaptation of the PWM framework to support atomic > > update. > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> > > --- > > Patch generated with the following coccinelle script: > > > > --->8--- > > virtual patch > > > > @@ > > struct pwm_device *p; > > expression e; > > @@ > > ( > > -(p)->polarity = e; > > +pwm_set_polarity((p), e); > > | > > -(p)->polarity > > +pwm_get_polarity((p)) > > | > > -(p)->period = e; > > +pwm_set_period((p), e); > > | > > -(p)->period > > +pwm_get_period((p)) > > | > > -(p)->duty_cycle = e; > > +pwm_set_duty_cycle((p), e); > > | > > -(p)->duty_cycle > > +pwm_get_duty_cycle((p)) > > ) > > --->8--- > > --- > > drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c | 2 +- > > drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c > > index 7101c70..2f88543 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c > > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c > > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static int crc_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *c, struct pwm_device *pwm, > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > > > - if (pwm->period != period_ns) { > > + if (pwm_get_period((pwm)) != period_ns) { > > int clk_div; > > > > /* changing the clk divisor, need to disable fisrt */ > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c > > index 9163085..091fa13 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c > > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c > > @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int lpc18xx_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) > > LPC18XX_PWM_EVSTATEMSK(lpc18xx_data->duty_event), > > LPC18XX_PWM_EVSTATEMSK_ALL); > > > > - if (pwm->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL) { > > + if (pwm_get_polarity((pwm)) == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL) { > > What is the deal with the double parentheses? > > Think I saw that in some of the other patches as well. It comes from a typo in my coccinelle script. I already fixed it and regenerated the faulty patches, so please ignore this aspect while reviewing (this will be addressed in the next version). Thanks, Boris
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c index 7101c70..2f88543 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static int crc_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *c, struct pwm_device *pwm, return -EINVAL; } - if (pwm->period != period_ns) { + if (pwm_get_period((pwm)) != period_ns) { int clk_div; /* changing the clk divisor, need to disable fisrt */ diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c index 9163085..091fa13 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int lpc18xx_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) LPC18XX_PWM_EVSTATEMSK(lpc18xx_data->duty_event), LPC18XX_PWM_EVSTATEMSK_ALL); - if (pwm->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL) { + if (pwm_get_polarity((pwm)) == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL) { set_event = lpc18xx_pwm->period_event; clear_event = lpc18xx_data->duty_event; res_action = LPC18XX_PWM_RES_SET;
Use pwm_get_xxx() helpers instead of directly accessing the pwm->xxx field. Doing that will ease adaptation of the PWM framework to support atomic update. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> --- Patch generated with the following coccinelle script: --->8--- virtual patch @@ struct pwm_device *p; expression e; @@ ( -(p)->polarity = e; +pwm_set_polarity((p), e); | -(p)->polarity +pwm_get_polarity((p)) | -(p)->period = e; +pwm_set_period((p), e); | -(p)->period +pwm_get_period((p)) | -(p)->duty_cycle = e; +pwm_set_duty_cycle((p), e); | -(p)->duty_cycle +pwm_get_duty_cycle((p)) ) --->8--- --- drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c | 2 +- drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)