diff mbox series

[2/2] video: backlight: qcom-wled: Add PMI8994 compatible

Message ID 20210228124106.135812-2-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers show
Series [1/2] dt-bindings: leds: backlight: qcom-wled: Add PMI8994 compatible | expand

Commit Message

Konrad Dybcio Feb. 28, 2021, 12:41 p.m. UTC
Add a compatible for PMI8994 WLED. It uses the V4 of WLED IP.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Daniel Thompson March 22, 2021, 4:18 p.m. UTC | #1
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 01:41:05PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Add a compatible for PMI8994 WLED. It uses the V4 of WLED IP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>


Daniel.


> ---
>  drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
> index 3bc7800eb0a9..497b9035a908 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
> @@ -1704,6 +1704,7 @@ static int wled_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id wled_match_table[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm8941-wled", .data = (void *)3 },
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,pmi8994-wled", .data = (void *)4 },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-wled", .data = (void *)4 },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm660l-wled", .data = (void *)4 },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm8150l-wled", .data = (void *)5 },
> -- 
> 2.30.1
Lee Jones March 23, 2021, 8:39 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Daniel Thompson wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 01:41:05PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > Add a compatible for PMI8994 WLED. It uses the V4 of WLED IP.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>

Why are you Reviewing/Acking a patch that was applied on the 10th?

> > ---
> >  drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
> > index 3bc7800eb0a9..497b9035a908 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
> > @@ -1704,6 +1704,7 @@ static int wled_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  
> >  static const struct of_device_id wled_match_table[] = {
> >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm8941-wled", .data = (void *)3 },
> > +	{ .compatible = "qcom,pmi8994-wled", .data = (void *)4 },
> >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-wled", .data = (void *)4 },
> >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm660l-wled", .data = (void *)4 },
> >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm8150l-wled", .data = (void *)5 },
Daniel Thompson March 23, 2021, 9:35 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 08:39:35AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 01:41:05PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > > Add a compatible for PMI8994 WLED. It uses the V4 of WLED IP.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> 
> Why are you Reviewing/Acking a patch that was applied on the 10th?

Simply an oversight. Looks like I forgot to remove it from my backlog
when it was applied.


Daniel.


> 
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
> > > index 3bc7800eb0a9..497b9035a908 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
> > > @@ -1704,6 +1704,7 @@ static int wled_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  
> > >  static const struct of_device_id wled_match_table[] = {
> > >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm8941-wled", .data = (void *)3 },
> > > +	{ .compatible = "qcom,pmi8994-wled", .data = (void *)4 },
> > >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-wled", .data = (void *)4 },
> > >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm660l-wled", .data = (void *)4 },
> > >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm8150l-wled", .data = (void *)5 },
> 
> -- 
> Lee Jones [李琼斯]
> Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
> Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Lee Jones March 23, 2021, 9:42 a.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021, Daniel Thompson wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 08:39:35AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 01:41:05PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > > > Add a compatible for PMI8994 WLED. It uses the V4 of WLED IP.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> > 
> > Why are you Reviewing/Acking a patch that was applied on the 10th?
> 
> Simply an oversight. Looks like I forgot to remove it from my backlog
> when it was applied.

I wondered if I'd made a mistake.

No problem.  Thanks for the clarification.

> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c | 1 +
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
> > > > index 3bc7800eb0a9..497b9035a908 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
> > > > @@ -1704,6 +1704,7 @@ static int wled_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > >  
> > > >  static const struct of_device_id wled_match_table[] = {
> > > >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm8941-wled", .data = (void *)3 },
> > > > +	{ .compatible = "qcom,pmi8994-wled", .data = (void *)4 },
> > > >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-wled", .data = (void *)4 },
> > > >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm660l-wled", .data = (void *)4 },
> > > >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm8150l-wled", .data = (void *)5 },
> >
Geert Uytterhoeven March 24, 2021, 8:54 a.m. UTC | #5
Hi Lee,

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 9:40 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 01:41:05PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > > Add a compatible for PMI8994 WLED. It uses the V4 of WLED IP.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
>
> Why are you Reviewing/Acking a patch that was applied on the 10th?

Only 12 days later?!?

It's not uncommon to receive acks for patches after they have been
applied upstream. But it is if the patch was applied 10 years and 9
months ago!
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-m68k/F5513AE92A5A1047AC2F91AEBB9202680288CBBA3983@E2K7-MS2.ds.strath.ac.uk/

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert
Lee Jones March 24, 2021, 9:14 a.m. UTC | #6
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> Hi Lee,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 9:40 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 01:41:05PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > > > Add a compatible for PMI8994 WLED. It uses the V4 of WLED IP.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> >
> > Why are you Reviewing/Acking a patch that was applied on the 10th?
> 
> Only 12 days later?!?
> 
> It's not uncommon to receive acks for patches after they have been
> applied upstream. But it is if the patch was applied 10 years and 9
> months ago!
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-m68k/F5513AE92A5A1047AC2F91AEBB9202680288CBBA3983@E2K7-MS2.ds.strath.ac.uk/

That truly is next level! :)
Konrad Dybcio May 27, 2021, 4:09 p.m. UTC | #7
Hi,

> Why are you Reviewing/Acking a patch that was applied on the 10th?

Forgive me if it turns out I'm blind, but I can't see the patch being in either -next, backlight/for-next, or 5.13-rc3. Perhaps it was omitted after all?


Konrad
Lee Jones May 27, 2021, 4:26 p.m. UTC | #8
On Thu, 27 May 2021, Konrad Dybcio wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> > Why are you Reviewing/Acking a patch that was applied on the 10th?
> 
> Forgive me if it turns out I'm blind, but I can't see the patch
> being in either -next, backlight/for-next, or 5.13-rc3. Perhaps it
> was omitted after all?

Interesting.  It's not you, it's me!

No idea what happened exactly TBH, but it's applied again.

Should be in -next tomorrow.  Apologies for the delay.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
index 3bc7800eb0a9..497b9035a908 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
@@ -1704,6 +1704,7 @@  static int wled_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 static const struct of_device_id wled_match_table[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm8941-wled", .data = (void *)3 },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,pmi8994-wled", .data = (void *)4 },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-wled", .data = (void *)4 },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm660l-wled", .data = (void *)4 },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm8150l-wled", .data = (void *)5 },