Message ID | 1605204403-6663-5-git-send-email-richard.gong@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Extend FPGA manager and region drivers for | expand |
On 11/12/20 10:06 AM, richard.gong@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Richard Gong <richard.gong@intel.com> > > Exten FPGA manager driver to support FPGA bitstream authentication on > Intel SocFPGA platforms. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Gong <richard.gong@intel.com> > --- > drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c b/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c > index 657a70c..8a59365 100644 > --- a/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c > +++ b/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c > @@ -185,7 +185,10 @@ static int s10_ops_write_init(struct fpga_manager *mgr, > ctype.flags = 0; > if (info->flags & FPGA_MGR_PARTIAL_RECONFIG) { > dev_dbg(dev, "Requesting partial reconfiguration.\n"); > - ctype.flags |= BIT(COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG_PARTIAL); > + ctype.flags |= FPGA_MGR_PARTIAL_RECONFIG; The change does not match the commit log. Add some comment like.. 'Cleanup setting of partial reconfig flag' to cover the change. Tom > + } else if (info->flags & FPGA_MGR_BITSTREM_AUTHENTICATION) { > + dev_dbg(dev, "Requesting bitstream authentication.\n"); > + ctype.flags |= FPGA_MGR_BITSTREM_AUTHENTICATION; > } else { > dev_dbg(dev, "Requesting full reconfiguration.\n"); > }
Hi Tom. On 11/13/20 2:31 PM, Tom Rix wrote: > > On 11/12/20 10:06 AM, richard.gong@linux.intel.com wrote: >> From: Richard Gong <richard.gong@intel.com> >> >> Exten FPGA manager driver to support FPGA bitstream authentication on >> Intel SocFPGA platforms. >> >> Signed-off-by: Richard Gong <richard.gong@intel.com> >> --- >> drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c | 5 ++++- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c b/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c >> index 657a70c..8a59365 100644 >> --- a/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c >> +++ b/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c >> @@ -185,7 +185,10 @@ static int s10_ops_write_init(struct fpga_manager *mgr, >> ctype.flags = 0; >> if (info->flags & FPGA_MGR_PARTIAL_RECONFIG) { >> dev_dbg(dev, "Requesting partial reconfiguration.\n"); >> - ctype.flags |= BIT(COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG_PARTIAL); >> + ctype.flags |= FPGA_MGR_PARTIAL_RECONFIG; > > The change does not match the commit log. > > Add some comment like.. > > 'Cleanup setting of partial reconfig flag' > > to cover the change. I will make the cleanup change separately in a different patch. Regards, Richard > > Tom > >> + } else if (info->flags & FPGA_MGR_BITSTREM_AUTHENTICATION) { >> + dev_dbg(dev, "Requesting bitstream authentication.\n"); >> + ctype.flags |= FPGA_MGR_BITSTREM_AUTHENTICATION; >> } else { >> dev_dbg(dev, "Requesting full reconfiguration.\n"); >> } >
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:06:43PM -0600, richard.gong@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Richard Gong <richard.gong@intel.com> > > Exten FPGA manager driver to support FPGA bitstream authentication on Nit: Extend > Intel SocFPGA platforms. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Gong <richard.gong@intel.com> > --- > drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c b/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c > index 657a70c..8a59365 100644 > --- a/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c > +++ b/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c > @@ -185,7 +185,10 @@ static int s10_ops_write_init(struct fpga_manager *mgr, > ctype.flags = 0; > if (info->flags & FPGA_MGR_PARTIAL_RECONFIG) { > dev_dbg(dev, "Requesting partial reconfiguration.\n"); > - ctype.flags |= BIT(COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG_PARTIAL); > + ctype.flags |= FPGA_MGR_PARTIAL_RECONFIG; I think we had this discussion during the original review of the stratix10-soc driver? Wasn't the point of using the BIT() to not assume alignment of FPGA_MGR flags and firmware structure? The FPGA_MGR_* bits are kernel internal and can therefore change, it would be unfortunate to end up in a situation where this breaks the FW interface (assuming firmware uses the value in pass-through which it looks like is what is happening). > + } else if (info->flags & FPGA_MGR_BITSTREM_AUTHENTICATION) { > + dev_dbg(dev, "Requesting bitstream authentication.\n"); > + ctype.flags |= FPGA_MGR_BITSTREM_AUTHENTICATION; Do you want to change this to BIT(COMMAND_AUTHENTICATE_BITSTREAM) or something like that? > } else { > dev_dbg(dev, "Requesting full reconfiguration.\n"); > } > -- > 2.7.4 > Thanks, Moritz
Hi Moritz, On 11/15/20 1:19 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:06:43PM -0600, richard.gong@linux.intel.com wrote: >> From: Richard Gong <richard.gong@intel.com> >> >> Exten FPGA manager driver to support FPGA bitstream authentication on > Nit: Extend Sorry, I will fix that in version 2. >> Intel SocFPGA platforms. >> >> Signed-off-by: Richard Gong <richard.gong@intel.com> >> --- >> drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c | 5 ++++- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c b/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c >> index 657a70c..8a59365 100644 >> --- a/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c >> +++ b/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c >> @@ -185,7 +185,10 @@ static int s10_ops_write_init(struct fpga_manager *mgr, >> ctype.flags = 0; >> if (info->flags & FPGA_MGR_PARTIAL_RECONFIG) { >> dev_dbg(dev, "Requesting partial reconfiguration.\n"); >> - ctype.flags |= BIT(COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG_PARTIAL); >> + ctype.flags |= FPGA_MGR_PARTIAL_RECONFIG; > I think we had this discussion during the original review of the > stratix10-soc driver? Yes, we discussed before. > > Wasn't the point of using the BIT() to not assume alignment of FPGA_MGR > flags and firmware structure? > Yes, we should use BIT(). > The FPGA_MGR_* bits are kernel internal and can therefore change, it > would be unfortunate to end up in a situation where this breaks the FW > interface (assuming firmware uses the value in pass-through which it > looks like is what is happening). In that case, I should use the flag defined in stratix10-soc driver driver. > >> + } else if (info->flags & FPGA_MGR_BITSTREM_AUTHENTICATION) { >> + dev_dbg(dev, "Requesting bitstream authentication.\n"); >> + ctype.flags |= FPGA_MGR_BITSTREM_AUTHENTICATION; > Do you want to change this to BIT(COMMAND_AUTHENTICATE_BITSTREAM) or > something like that? OK, I will change to BIT(COMMAND_AUTHENTICATE_BITSTREAM). Regards, Richard >> } else { >> dev_dbg(dev, "Requesting full reconfiguration.\n"); >> } >> -- >> 2.7.4 >> > > Thanks, > Moritz >
diff --git a/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c b/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c index 657a70c..8a59365 100644 --- a/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c +++ b/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c @@ -185,7 +185,10 @@ static int s10_ops_write_init(struct fpga_manager *mgr, ctype.flags = 0; if (info->flags & FPGA_MGR_PARTIAL_RECONFIG) { dev_dbg(dev, "Requesting partial reconfiguration.\n"); - ctype.flags |= BIT(COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG_PARTIAL); + ctype.flags |= FPGA_MGR_PARTIAL_RECONFIG; + } else if (info->flags & FPGA_MGR_BITSTREM_AUTHENTICATION) { + dev_dbg(dev, "Requesting bitstream authentication.\n"); + ctype.flags |= FPGA_MGR_BITSTREM_AUTHENTICATION; } else { dev_dbg(dev, "Requesting full reconfiguration.\n"); }