From patchwork Mon Jan 4 15:57:07 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greg Kroah-Hartman X-Patchwork-Id: 11997001 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45065C4332E for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 16:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3C920578 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 16:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728257AbhADQAM (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2021 11:00:12 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36514 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726303AbhADQAM (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2021 11:00:12 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBCBD2245C; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 15:59:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1609775986; bh=Txg8vjG+zm1ySgA6xD9pxK8obTvav+wm5HL9doUGluk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=G2vXyF40YOzx6wwliZngJ6xcTaTesip7Gu8ZpXUr0yyQpadbcCOukHphhuYRyZbdn nQgSeL2ErStgWNwUKo85tKz4PhOeOd8nVB5g++CQKWfEo1YsTTaPZogpUQwSAaGA89 O1nqmEYC+j2PHujtq5fYZZjq0CiQKNjJZSE3NObE= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, Eric Biggers Subject: [PATCH 5.4 08/47] fscrypt: remove kernel-internal constants from UAPI header Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 16:57:07 +0100 Message-Id: <20210104155706.154631213@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 In-Reply-To: <20210104155705.740576914@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210104155705.740576914@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org From: Eric Biggers commit 3ceb6543e9cf6ed87cc1fbc6f23ca2db903564cd upstream. There isn't really any valid reason to use __FSCRYPT_MODE_MAX or FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_VALID in a userspace program. These constants are only meant to be used by the kernel internally, and they are defined in the UAPI header next to the mode numbers and flags only so that kernel developers don't forget to update them when adding new modes or flags. In https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201005074133.1958633-2-satyat@google.com there was an example of someone wanting to use __FSCRYPT_MODE_MAX in a user program, and it was wrong because the program would have broken if __FSCRYPT_MODE_MAX were ever increased. So having this definition available is harmful. FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_VALID has the same problem. So, remove these definitions from the UAPI header. Replace FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_VALID with just listing the valid flags explicitly in the one kernel function that needs it. Move __FSCRYPT_MODE_MAX to fscrypt_private.h, remove the double underscores (which were only present to discourage use by userspace), and add a BUILD_BUG_ON() and comments to (hopefully) ensure it is kept in sync. Keep the old name FS_POLICY_FLAGS_VALID, since it's been around for longer and there's a greater chance that removing it would break source compatibility with some program. Indeed, mtd-utils is using it in an #ifdef, and removing it would introduce compiler warnings (about FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_* being redefined) into the mtd-utils build. However, reduce its value to 0x07 so that it only includes the flags with old names (the ones present before Linux 5.4), and try to make it clear that it's now "frozen" and no new flags should be added to it. Fixes: 2336d0deb2d4 ("fscrypt: use FSCRYPT_ prefix for uapi constants") Cc: # v5.4+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201024005132.495952-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h | 5 ++++- fs/crypto/keysetup.c | 2 ++ fs/crypto/policy.c | 6 ++++-- include/uapi/linux/fscrypt.h | 5 ++--- 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h +++ b/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ #define FSCRYPT_CONTEXT_V1 1 #define FSCRYPT_CONTEXT_V2 2 +/* Keep this in sync with include/uapi/linux/fscrypt.h */ +#define FSCRYPT_MODE_MAX FSCRYPT_MODE_ADIANTUM + struct fscrypt_context_v1 { u8 version; /* FSCRYPT_CONTEXT_V1 */ u8 contents_encryption_mode; @@ -387,7 +390,7 @@ struct fscrypt_master_key { spinlock_t mk_decrypted_inodes_lock; /* Per-mode tfms for DIRECT_KEY policies, allocated on-demand */ - struct crypto_skcipher *mk_mode_keys[__FSCRYPT_MODE_MAX + 1]; + struct crypto_skcipher *mk_mode_keys[FSCRYPT_MODE_MAX + 1]; } __randomize_layout; --- a/fs/crypto/keysetup.c +++ b/fs/crypto/keysetup.c @@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ static struct fscrypt_mode * select_encryption_mode(const union fscrypt_policy *policy, const struct inode *inode) { + BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(available_modes) != FSCRYPT_MODE_MAX + 1); + if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) return &available_modes[fscrypt_policy_contents_mode(policy)]; --- a/fs/crypto/policy.c +++ b/fs/crypto/policy.c @@ -55,7 +55,8 @@ bool fscrypt_supported_policy(const unio return false; } - if (policy->flags & ~FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_VALID) { + if (policy->flags & ~(FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_MASK | + FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY)) { fscrypt_warn(inode, "Unsupported encryption flags (0x%02x)", policy->flags); @@ -76,7 +77,8 @@ bool fscrypt_supported_policy(const unio return false; } - if (policy->flags & ~FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_VALID) { + if (policy->flags & ~(FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_MASK | + FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY)) { fscrypt_warn(inode, "Unsupported encryption flags (0x%02x)", policy->flags); --- a/include/uapi/linux/fscrypt.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fscrypt.h @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ #define FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_32 0x03 #define FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_MASK 0x03 #define FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY 0x04 -#define FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_VALID 0x07 /* Encryption algorithms */ #define FSCRYPT_MODE_AES_256_XTS 1 @@ -25,7 +24,7 @@ #define FSCRYPT_MODE_AES_128_CBC 5 #define FSCRYPT_MODE_AES_128_CTS 6 #define FSCRYPT_MODE_ADIANTUM 9 -#define __FSCRYPT_MODE_MAX 9 +/* If adding a mode number > 9, update FSCRYPT_MODE_MAX in fscrypt_private.h */ /* * Legacy policy version; ad-hoc KDF and no key verification. @@ -162,7 +161,7 @@ struct fscrypt_get_key_status_arg { #define FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_32 FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_32 #define FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_MASK FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_MASK #define FS_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY -#define FS_POLICY_FLAGS_VALID FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_VALID +#define FS_POLICY_FLAGS_VALID 0x07 /* contains old flags only */ #define FS_ENCRYPTION_MODE_INVALID 0 /* never used */ #define FS_ENCRYPTION_MODE_AES_256_XTS FSCRYPT_MODE_AES_256_XTS #define FS_ENCRYPTION_MODE_AES_256_GCM 2 /* never used */