@@ -107,8 +107,9 @@ int fscrypt_crypt_block(const struct inode *inode, fscrypt_direction_t rw,
struct skcipher_request *req = NULL;
DECLARE_CRYPTO_WAIT(wait);
struct scatterlist dst, src;
- struct fscrypt_info *ci = fscrypt_get_lblk_info(inode, lblk_num, NULL,
- NULL);
+ u64 ci_offset = 0;
+ struct fscrypt_info *ci = fscrypt_get_lblk_info(inode, lblk_num,
+ &ci_offset, NULL);
struct crypto_skcipher *tfm = ci->ci_enc_key.tfm;
int res = 0;
@@ -117,7 +118,7 @@ int fscrypt_crypt_block(const struct inode *inode, fscrypt_direction_t rw,
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(len % FSCRYPT_CONTENTS_ALIGNMENT != 0))
return -EINVAL;
- fscrypt_generate_iv(&iv, lblk_num, ci);
+ fscrypt_generate_iv(&iv, ci_offset, ci);
req = skcipher_request_alloc(tfm, gfp_flags);
if (!req)
@@ -271,12 +271,13 @@ void fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx(struct bio *bio, const struct inode *inode,
{
const struct fscrypt_info *ci;
u64 dun[BLK_CRYPTO_DUN_ARRAY_SIZE];
+ u64 ci_offset = 0;
if (!fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto(inode))
return;
- ci = fscrypt_get_lblk_info(inode, first_lblk, NULL, NULL);
+ ci = fscrypt_get_lblk_info(inode, first_lblk, &ci_offset, NULL);
- fscrypt_generate_dun(ci, first_lblk, dun);
+ fscrypt_generate_dun(ci, ci_offset, dun);
bio_crypt_set_ctx(bio, ci->ci_enc_key.blk_key, dun, gfp_mask);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx);
@@ -354,13 +355,14 @@ bool fscrypt_mergeable_bio(struct bio *bio, const struct inode *inode,
const struct bio_crypt_ctx *bc = bio->bi_crypt_context;
u64 next_dun[BLK_CRYPTO_DUN_ARRAY_SIZE];
struct fscrypt_info *ci;
+ u64 ci_offset = 0;
if (!!bc != fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto(inode))
return false;
if (!bc)
return true;
- ci = fscrypt_get_lblk_info(inode, next_lblk, NULL, NULL);
+ ci = fscrypt_get_lblk_info(inode, next_lblk, &ci_offset, NULL);
/*
* Comparing the key pointers is good enough, as all I/O for each key
* uses the same pointer. I.e., there's currently no need to support
@@ -369,7 +371,7 @@ bool fscrypt_mergeable_bio(struct bio *bio, const struct inode *inode,
if (bc->bc_key != ci->ci_enc_key.blk_key)
return false;
- fscrypt_generate_dun(ci, next_lblk, next_dun);
+ fscrypt_generate_dun(ci, ci_offset, next_dun);
return bio_crypt_dun_is_contiguous(bc, bio->bi_iter.bi_size, next_dun);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fscrypt_mergeable_bio);
@@ -464,6 +466,8 @@ u64 fscrypt_limit_io_blocks(const struct inode *inode, u64 lblk, u64 nr_blocks)
{
const struct fscrypt_info *ci;
u32 dun;
+ u64 ci_offset;
+ u64 extent_len;
if (!fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto(inode))
return nr_blocks;
@@ -471,14 +475,17 @@ u64 fscrypt_limit_io_blocks(const struct inode *inode, u64 lblk, u64 nr_blocks)
if (nr_blocks <= 1)
return nr_blocks;
- ci = fscrypt_get_lblk_info(inode, lblk, NULL, NULL);
+ ci = fscrypt_get_lblk_info(inode, lblk, &ci_offset, &extent_len);
+
+ /* Spanning an extent boundary will change the DUN */
+ nr_blocks = min_t(u64, nr_blocks, extent_len);
if (!(fscrypt_policy_flags(&ci->ci_policy) &
FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_32))
return nr_blocks;
/* With IV_INO_LBLK_32, the DUN can wrap around from U32_MAX to 0. */
- dun = ci->ci_hashed_ino + lblk;
+ dun = ci->ci_hashed_ino + ci_offset;
return min_t(u64, nr_blocks, (u64)U32_MAX + 1 - dun);
}
If a filesystem uses extent-based encryption, then the offset within a file is not a constant which can be used for calculating an IV. For instance, the same extent could be blocks 0-8 in one file, and blocks 100-108 in another file. Instead, the block offset within the extent must be used instead. Update all uses of logical block offset within the file to use logical block offset within the extent, if applicable. Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> --- fs/crypto/crypto.c | 7 ++++--- fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c | 19 +++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)