Message ID | 20201209192839.1396820-1-mic@digikod.net (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Landlock LSM | expand |
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 8:28 PM Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> wrote: > This patch series adds new built-time checks, a new test, renames some > variables and functions to improve readability, and shift syscall > numbers to align with -next. Sorry, I've finally gotten around to looking at v26 - I hadn't actually looked at v25 either yet. I think there's still one remaining small issue in the filesystem access logic, but I think that's very simple to fix, as long as we agree on what the expected semantics are. Otherwise it basically looks good, apart from some typos. I think v27 will be the final version of this series. :) (And I'll try to actually look at that version much faster - I realize that waiting for code reviews this long sucks.)
On 14/01/2021 04:22, Jann Horn wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 8:28 PM Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> wrote: >> This patch series adds new built-time checks, a new test, renames some >> variables and functions to improve readability, and shift syscall >> numbers to align with -next. > > Sorry, I've finally gotten around to looking at v26 - I hadn't > actually looked at v25 either yet. I think there's still one remaining > small issue in the filesystem access logic, but I think that's very > simple to fix, as long as we agree on what the expected semantics are. > Otherwise it basically looks good, apart from some typos. > > I think v27 will be the final version of this series. :) (And I'll try > to actually look at that version much faster - I realize that waiting > for code reviews this long sucks.) > I'm improving the tests, especially with bind mounts and overlayfs tests. The v27 will also contains a better documentation to clarify the semantic and explain how these mounts are handled. Thanks!