Message ID | 20210212044405.4120619-1-drinkcat@chromium.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add generated flag to filesystem struct to block copy_file_range | expand |
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:43:59PM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote: > We hit an issue when upgrading Go compiler from 1.13 to 1.15 [1], > as we use Go's `io.Copy` to copy the content of > `/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace` to a temporary file. > > Under the hood, Go 1.15 uses `copy_file_range` syscall to > optimize the copy operation. However, that fails to copy any > content when the input file is from tracefs, with an apparent > size of 0 (but there is still content when you `cat` it, of > course). > > >From discussions in [2][3], it is clear that copy_file_range > cannot be properly implemented on filesystems where the content > is generated at runtime: the file size is incorrect (because it > is unknown before the content is generated), and seeking in such > files (as required by partial writes) is unlikely to work > correctly. > > With this patch, Go's `io.Copy` gracefully falls back to a normal > read/write file copy. > > I'm not 100% sure which stable tree this should go in, I'd say > at least >=5.3 since this is what introduced support for > cross-filesystem copy_file_range (and where most users are > somewhat likely to hit this issue). But let's discuss the patch > series first. No. This is *NOT* an fs-wide flag. Decision regarding the usability of copy_file_range() is on per-file basis. The real constraint is "can freely seek back and expect to find consistent data". That is what's violated for seq_file. And frankly, I would rather add a flag and have seq_open() (and other suckers, if any) clear it. With check being "has both FMODE_PREAD and this new flag".