From patchwork Thu Jan 25 22:56:56 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Joe Damato X-Patchwork-Id: 13531811 Received: from mail-io1-f43.google.com (mail-io1-f43.google.com [209.85.166.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B86412B8C for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:57:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.166.43 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706223467; cv=none; b=c/y+mcM49nDKBdFIVcJZdY2npmIGM7CSiSwsZllsQY9/QeElNVksvzmh9pEdF8pj4U9FYDN6vqgUGISsLbZqnchPiaXEzBwZwCcmXGiU+ex16D/cOnZ1SznGeq8qQXdStwAe/M6RrtukpeH4384QaNooBTWBAdV+K99mVrmWD+E= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706223467; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6odP9Zfv4jT1UPPhYzIXbp8Wkc0XoPa8xwrrf2TyNnQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=CLR1mIW6tWD/KfKG3QHMEzXrJT8Aw2EOoIlgYJWrdIJ/1H5ctFXLKpP5d+FarsumElobQcclGw4VECD5Z1rncCz0oosvQTJJcjBLRT0Ha+H61lB3Ug7L7MHfFBmiKJMQYDk9qGHKX+/Pk52e0oQkVYkEJ71w9i8Wh9dotyMbpDg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=fastly.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fastly.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastly.com header.i=@fastly.com header.b=B58/m/Id; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.166.43 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=fastly.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fastly.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastly.com header.i=@fastly.com header.b="B58/m/Id" Received: by mail-io1-f43.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-7bed9f5d35dso362296539f.3 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:57:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastly.com; s=google; t=1706223464; x=1706828264; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DmGx9+QDJXLKTo3H9MiyfX7TEgh1xSwvOnrY9VXnVdM=; b=B58/m/IdEYEIh4nIv0EmFBOm4KbcmU6fOaU+HuIHrhpFJpz/MM3n8bRPbuqAbecug3 N6YzG3FjKiKEebsmKqjSkWs4Pg3AGfTud+81aSxHknxuks2j6eU4RO9yzC2qHQQ4ZlZY ayecjUqmgf8t81yW5/d2MHYjH7AhLyrCDFL90= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706223464; x=1706828264; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=DmGx9+QDJXLKTo3H9MiyfX7TEgh1xSwvOnrY9VXnVdM=; b=fIwqbuW9FMrLjZ3RghicExhaO9PVPDZBESBOoi6EyZ65olnZHV2p0dvByVY5hxueTC lnMKsjkDc+40nROtiSNcRG+drsLvyRuXctAs2wr9DlRpPFEbtxHaXkZbUcJ7gLk9h97E s4a0RtrA7SfbmKQIiPIQXETa2Xq56KXhyXZJX8wIPaouA1zzLMLF3BsAP/FUfY2tVw6K FwKxhkwffLLiKtf3AET2NsbBYuEgx5E7KC9hv6/o+Fz1p+aZ1ah0IKYzdi9NaI7PGURV iA23pDOXpXYTDD5kYNNx+DMUfUgeG/wiKbK5Pp0xoKfpmcncQN6u9ScwA9XTDPNJZ2D+ tI7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwHog7pA9nNUP3wr+cRqpnkQoOLkE9f9Ii76oVSEe5ezbXM/htK wDFHL4vUrfNktyRtu1sFtybWhiNo9+3slehjMLfubgCB9rfyPWoebggaK60aW8Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGJOlk8p0p+eepUvrJIZ2A7VA58foiJl5D62a/cdKG2oMDEtZHgf75lD945pBIByTtOFe6B7w== X-Received: by 2002:a92:290f:0:b0:35f:ced5:5555 with SMTP id l15-20020a92290f000000b0035fced55555mr437125ilg.25.1706223464499; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:57:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2620:11a:c018:0:ea8:be91:8d1:f59b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z24-20020a631918000000b005d68962e1a7sm19948pgl.24.2024.01.25.14.57.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:57:43 -0800 (PST) From: Joe Damato To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: chuck.lever@oracle.com, jlayton@kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, davem@davemloft.net, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, kuba@kernel.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, weiwan@google.com, Joe Damato , Alexander Viro , Andrew Waterman , Arnd Bergmann , Dominik Brodowski , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jan Kara , Jiri Slaby , Jonathan Corbet , Julien Panis , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org (open list:DOCUMENTATION), linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org (open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure)), Michael Ellerman , Nathan Lynch , Palmer Dabbelt , Steve French , Thomas Huth , Thomas Zimmermann Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] Per epoll context busy poll support Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:56:56 +0000 Message-Id: <20240125225704.12781-1-jdamato@fastly.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Greetings: Welcome to v3. Cover letter updated from v2 to explain why ioctl and adjusted my cc_cmd to try to get the correct people in addition to folks who were added in v1 & v2. Labeled as net-next because it seems networking related to me even though it is fs code. TL;DR This builds on commit bf3b9f6372c4 ("epoll: Add busy poll support to epoll with socket fds.") by allowing user applications to enable epoll-based busy polling and set a busy poll packet budget on a per epoll context basis. This makes epoll-based busy polling much more usable for user applications than the current system-wide sysctl and hardcoded budget. To allow for this, two ioctls have been added for epoll contexts for getting and setting a new struct, struct epoll_params. ioctl was chosen vs a new syscall after reviewing a suggestion by Willem de Bruijn [1]. I am open to using a new syscall instead of an ioctl, but it seemed that: - Busy poll affects all existing epoll_wait and epoll_pwait variants in the same way, so new verions of many syscalls might be needed. It seems much simpler for users to use the correct epoll_wait/epoll_pwait for their app and add a call to ioctl to enable or disable busy poll as needed. This also probably means less work to get an existing epoll app using busy poll. - previously added epoll_pwait2 helped to bring epoll closer to existing syscalls (like pselect and ppoll) and this busy poll change reflected as a new syscall would not have the same effect. Note: patch 1/4 uses an xor so that busy poll is only enabled if the per-context busy poll usecs is set or the system-wide sysctl. If both are enabled, busy polling does not happen. Calling this out specifically incase there are strong feelings about this one; I felt one xor the other made sense, but I am open to changing it. Longer explanation: Presently epoll has support for a very useful form of busy poll based on the incoming NAPI ID (see also: SO_INCOMING_NAPI_ID [2]). This form of busy poll allows epoll_wait to drive NAPI packet processing which allows for a few interesting user application designs which can reduce latency and also potentially improve L2/L3 cache hit rates by deferring NAPI until userland has finished its work. The documentation available on this is, IMHO, a bit confusing so please allow me to explain how one might use this: 1. Ensure each application thread has its own epoll instance mapping 1-to-1 with NIC RX queues. An n-tuple filter would likely be used to direct connections with specific dest ports to these queues. 2. Optionally: Setup IRQ coalescing for the NIC RX queues where busy polling will occur. This can help avoid the userland app from being pre-empted by a hard IRQ while userland is running. Note this means that userland must take care to call epoll_wait and not take too long in userland since it now drives NAPI via epoll_wait. 3. Optionally: Consider using napi_defer_hard_irqs and gro_flush_timeout to further restrict IRQ generation from the NIC. These settings are system-wide so their impact must be carefully weighed against the running applications. 4. Ensure that all incoming connections added to an epoll instance have the same NAPI ID. This can be done with a BPF filter when SO_REUSEPORT is used or getsockopt + SO_INCOMING_NAPI_ID when a single accept thread is used which dispatches incoming connections to threads. 5. Lastly, busy poll must be enabled via a sysctl (/proc/sys/net/core/busy_poll). Please see Eric Dumazet's paper about busy polling [3] and a recent academic paper about measured performance improvements of busy polling [4] (albeit with a modification that is not currently present in the kernel) for additional context. The unfortunate part about step 5 above is that this enables busy poll system-wide which affects all user applications on the system, including epoll-based network applications which were not intended to be used this way or applications where increased CPU usage for lower latency network processing is unnecessary or not desirable. If the user wants to run one low latency epoll-based server application with epoll-based busy poll, but would like to run the rest of the applications on the system (which may also use epoll) without busy poll, this system-wide sysctl presents a significant problem. This change preserves the system-wide sysctl, but adds a mechanism (via ioctl) to enable or disable busy poll for epoll contexts as needed by individual applications, making epoll-based busy poll more usable. Note that this change includes an xor allowing only the per-context busy poll or the system wide sysctl, not both. If both are enabled, busy polling does not happen. Calling this out specifically incase there are strong feelings about this one; I felt one xor the other made sense, but I am open to changing it. Thanks, Joe v2 -> v3: - cover letter updated to mention why ioctl seems (to me) like a better choice vs a new syscall. - patch 3/4 was modified in 3 ways: - when an unknown ioctl is received, -ENOIOCTLCMD is returned instead of -EINVAL as the ioctl documentation requires. - epoll_params.busy_poll_budget can only be set to a value larger than NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT if code is run by privileged (CAP_NET_ADMIN) users. Otherwise, -EPERM is returned. - busy poll specific ioctl code moved out to its own function. On kernels without busy poll support, -EOPNOTSUPP is returned. This also makes the kernel build robot happier without littering the code with more #ifdefs. - dropped patch 4/4 after Eric Dumazet's review of it when it was sent independently to the list [5]. v1 -> v2: - cover letter updated to make a mention of napi_defer_hard_irqs and gro_flush_timeout as an added step 3 and to cite both Eric Dumazet's busy polling paper and a paper from University of Waterloo for additional context. Specifically calling out the xor in patch 1/4 incase it is missed by reviewers. - Patch 2/4 has its commit message updated, but no functional changes. Commit message now describes that allowing for a settable budget helps to improve throughput and is more consistent with other busy poll mechanisms that allow a settable budget via SO_BUSY_POLL_BUDGET. - Patch 3/4 was modified to check if the epoll_params.busy_poll_budget exceeds NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT. The larger value is allowed, but an error is printed. This was done for consistency with netif_napi_add_weight, which does the same. - Patch 3/4 the struct epoll_params was updated to fix the type of the data field; it was uint8_t and was changed to u8. - Patch 4/4 added to check if SO_BUSY_POLL_BUDGET exceeds NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT. The larger value is allowed, but an error is printed. This was done for consistency with netif_napi_add_weight, which does the same. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/65b1cb7f73a6a_250560294bd@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20170324170836.15226.87178.stgit@localhost.localdomain/ [3]: https://netdevconf.info/2.1/papers/BusyPollingNextGen.pdf [4]: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3626780 [5]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CANn89i+uXsdSVFiQT9fDfGw+h_5QOcuHwPdWi9J=5U6oLXkQTA@mail.gmail.com/ Joe Damato (3): eventpoll: support busy poll per epoll instance eventpoll: Add per-epoll busy poll packet budget eventpoll: Add epoll ioctl for epoll_params .../userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst | 1 + fs/eventpoll.c | 122 +++++++++++++++++- include/uapi/linux/eventpoll.h | 12 ++ 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)