Message ID | 20240517111355.233085-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (unknown [45.249.212.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC6563D0A3; Fri, 17 May 2024 11:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715945090; cv=none; b=aHnF199yJN8hwxUX1ZJNY6YXxrKvAkWaYWMFvtaG0tT++9V3DVKCNL/Oob1RNtFT3iMhByTN9A13Os5V8WGd9mbJTzBNrdA6WGWm5SGB5SLuz1Oni14skcJ7J1WQzRNYQQRG15bgNxjTcidqR0wQeqioIehYbwrKIvNNYnySL7U= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715945090; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DoyCXkpOfzLWKgC9ctYH1ac8X2WIkrxKpQLa1A3Sw+Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=RGedFnnCr7jSLO+SOId/+ao9ofgtcfAcyUnnuwuQTWGhkomdQxhL+YHRnEy0Xn0iQkSZ8zq+fGjfVKm4UFKf5oaUxe/su8d18RvDrAVadwxS50eGufNuvqtpDHy85kiW+w37FL91HujFKYFVIliUIJkXSCAPIvzwAHiHYmLQL/Q= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.93.142]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Vgl3p3kPYz4f3jkq; Fri, 17 May 2024 19:24:38 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.112]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2280C1A017F; Fri, 17 May 2024 19:24:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.104.67]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgBHGBFrPkdm3V+kMw--.2732S4; Fri, 17 May 2024 19:24:41 +0800 (CST) From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com> To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, brauner@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, chandanbabu@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com, chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] iomap/xfs: fix stale data exposure when truncating realtime inodes Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 19:13:52 +0800 Message-Id: <20240517111355.233085-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-fsdevel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-fsdevel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgBHGBFrPkdm3V+kMw--.2732S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7AF4fZr4furyktF45Xry7Jrb_yoW8XF45pF Z8Gry5Wr48Gry3ua4fua1qv345J3W0yrWUuFyxtwnxZFy2qryIyr10ga10gayDtrykXr4U Xr15JFZ7Wr1vyrJanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUvj14x267AKxVW8JVW5JwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK02 1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26ryj6F1UM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j 6F4UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s 0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xII jxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr 1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lF7I21c0EjII2zVCS5cI20VAGYxC7M4IIrI8v6xkF7I0E8cxa n2IY04v7MxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrV AFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUtVW8ZwCI c40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267 AKxVW8JVWxJwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_WFyUJVCq3wCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWU JVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjfUoO J5UUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: d1lo6xhdqjqx5xdzvxpfor3voofrz/ |
Series |
iomap/xfs: fix stale data exposure when truncating realtime inodes
|
expand
|
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Changes since v2: - Use div_u64_rem() instead of do_div(). Changes since v1: - In iomap_truncate_page() and dax_truncate_page(), for the case of truncate blocksize is not power of 2, use do_dive() to calculate the offset. This series fix a stale data exposure issue reported by Chandan when running fstests generic/561 on xfs with realtime device[1]. The real problem is xfs_setattr_size() doesn't zero out enough range when truncating a realtime inode, please see the third patch or [1] for details. The first two patches modify iomap_truncate_page() and dax_truncate_page() to pass filesystem identified blocksize, and drop the assumption of i_blocksize() as Dave suggested. The third patch fix the issue by modifying xfs_truncate_page() to pass the correct blocksize, and make sure zeroed range have been flushed to disk before updating i_size. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/87ttj8ircu.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64/ Thanks, Yi. Zhang Yi (3): iomap: pass blocksize to iomap_truncate_page() fsdax: pass blocksize to dax_truncate_page() xfs: correct the zeroing truncate range fs/dax.c | 13 +++++++++---- fs/ext2/inode.c | 4 ++-- fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 13 +++++++++---- fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 10 ---------- include/linux/dax.h | 4 ++-- include/linux/iomap.h | 4 ++-- 7 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)