vfs: use list_{first,next}_entry

Commit Message

Geliang Tang Nov. 18, 2015, 2:05 p.m. UTC

To make the intention clearer, use list_{first,next}_entry instead of
list_entry.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[e-mail]>
---
 fs/pnode.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/fs/pnode.c b/fs/pnode.c
index 6367e1e..4b394dc 100644
--- a/fs/pnode.c
+++ b/fs/pnode.c
@@ -16,17 +16,17 @@ 
 /* return the next shared peer mount of @p */
 static inline struct mount *next_peer(struct mount *p)
 {
-	return list_entry(p->mnt_share.next, struct mount, mnt_share);
+	return list_next_entry(p, mnt_share);
 }
 
 static inline struct mount *first_slave(struct mount *p)
 {
-	return list_entry(p->mnt_slave_list.next, struct mount, mnt_slave);
+	return list_first_entry(&p->mnt_slave_list, struct mount, mnt_slave);
 }
 
 static inline struct mount *next_slave(struct mount *p)
 {
-	return list_entry(p->mnt_slave.next, struct mount, mnt_slave);
+	return list_next_entry(p, mnt_slave);
 }
 
 static struct mount *get_peer_under_root(struct mount *mnt,