From patchwork Tue Aug 4 11:53:20 2015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Andreas_Gr=C3=BCnbacher?= X-Patchwork-Id: 6937591 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-fsdevel@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork1.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by patchwork1.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5DC9F38B for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 12:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23632047B for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 12:04:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C78120480 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 12:04:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933662AbbHDMEH (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2015 08:04:07 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:37105 "EHLO mail-wi0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933683AbbHDLzS (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2015 07:55:18 -0400 Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so20341073wib.0; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 04:55:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=mWA7/oaL9hAs80S1paIjcZ53jOmVcO+8C75vrTZMauk=; b=JrYKdebNEoAKGQttlnZ8giQ9jq25FsbdlvmDBR6i7RlB7GrBEpWWZOa9AhSPcFaPPF iXQ8vNmPC2mkSpiPvJBchEulyof9Uu2YRrlQhXhd2aZSmNADZ8F9vUFlvhOsK4R6voWm R0I4JwzUSvxG99cU5L+T8FXJQw9FthmWHOTxA15IrD6B1L+Tah7vpEymilz+Xp0xM/Po r61O2CFrYd2MnmHzPy29z4ICsAAG0t0XquSMuXWo4we78ajk0sKl1dshUntj+1eoTuXQ j9OwS850UsopK7TVY4jcNLu/UKwCaDWqtFRDF339WmNyhQ9bRTb86pu2WCPBfQ0Syxy6 VRyw== X-Received: by 10.180.97.129 with SMTP id ea1mr45627594wib.24.1438689316751; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 04:55:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from schleppi.home.com (p54980F84.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [84.152.15.132]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u7sm2018458wif.3.2015.08.04.04.55.14 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Aug 2015 04:55:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Andreas Gruenbacher X-Google-Original-From: Andreas Gruenbacher To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Gruenbacher , Andreas Gruenbacher Subject: [RFC v6 22/40] richacl: Propagate everyone@ permissions to other aces Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 13:53:20 +0200 Message-Id: <1438689218-6921-23-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.5.0 In-Reply-To: <1438689218-6921-1-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> References: <1438689218-6921-1-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, T_DKIM_INVALID, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP The trailing everyone@ allow ace can grant permissions to all file classes including the owner and group class. Before we can apply the other mask to this entry to turn it into an "other class" entry, we need to ensure that members of the owner or group class will not lose any permissions from that ace. Conceptually, we do this by inserting additional :::allow entries before the trailing everyone@ allow ace with the same permissions as the trailing everyone@ allow ace for owner@, group@, and all explicitly mentioned users and groups. (In practice, we will rarely need to insert any additional aces in this step.) Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher --- fs/richacl_compat.c | 195 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 195 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/richacl_compat.c b/fs/richacl_compat.c index 5295c1c..e9c350e 100644 --- a/fs/richacl_compat.c +++ b/fs/richacl_compat.c @@ -217,3 +217,198 @@ richacl_move_everyone_aces_down(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) } return 0; } + +/** + * __richacl_propagate_everyone - propagate everyone@ permissions up for @who + * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries + * @who: identifier to propagate permissions for + * @allow: permissions to propagate up + * + * Propagate the permissions in @allow up from the end of the acl to the start + * for the specified principal @who. + * + * The simplest possible approach to achieve this would be to insert a + * ":::allow" ace before the final everyone@ allow ace. Since this + * would often result in aces which are not needed or which could be merged + * with an existing ace, we make the following optimizations: + * + * - We go through the acl and determine which permissions are already + * allowed or denied to @who, and we remove those permissions from + * @allow. + * + * - If the acl contains an allow ace for @who and no aces after this entry + * deny permissions in @allow, we add the permissions in @allow to this + * ace. (Propagating permissions across a deny ace which can match the + * process can elevate permissions.) + * + * This transformation does not alter the permissions that the acl grants. + */ +static int +__richacl_propagate_everyone(struct richacl_alloc *alloc, struct richace *who, + unsigned int allow) +{ + struct richace *allow_last = NULL, *ace; + struct richacl *acl = alloc->acl; + + /* + * Remove the permissions from allow that are already determined for + * this who value, and figure out if there is an allow entry for + * this who value that is "reachable" from the trailing everyone@ + * allow ace. + */ + richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) { + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) + continue; + if (richace_is_allow(ace)) { + if (richace_is_same_identifier(ace, who)) { + allow &= ~ace->e_mask; + allow_last = ace; + } + } else if (richace_is_deny(ace)) { + if (richace_is_same_identifier(ace, who)) + allow &= ~ace->e_mask; + else if (allow & ace->e_mask) + allow_last = NULL; + } + } + ace--; + + /* + * If for group class entries, all the remaining permissions will + * remain granted by the trailing everyone@ ace, no additional entry is + * needed. + */ + if (!richace_is_owner(who) && + richace_is_everyone(ace) && richace_is_allow(ace) && + !(allow & ~(ace->e_mask & acl->a_other_mask))) + allow = 0; + + if (allow) { + if (allow_last) + return richace_change_mask(alloc, &allow_last, + allow_last->e_mask | allow); + else { + struct richace who_copy; + + richace_copy(&who_copy, who); + ace = acl->a_entries + acl->a_count - 1; + if (richacl_insert_entry(alloc, &ace)) + return -1; + richace_copy(ace, &who_copy); + ace->e_type = RICHACE_ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE; + richace_clear_inheritance_flags(ace); + ace->e_mask = allow; + } + } + return 0; +} + +/** + * richacl_propagate_everyone - propagate everyone@ permissions up the acl + * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries + * + * Make sure that group@ and all other users and groups mentioned in the acl + * will not lose any permissions when finally applying the other mask to the + * everyone@ allow ace at the end of the acl. We modify the permissions of + * existing entries or add new entries before the final everyone@ allow ace to + * achieve that. + * + * For example, the following acl implicitly grants everyone rwpx access: + * + * joe:r::allow + * everyone@:rwpx::allow + * + * When applying mode 0660 to this acl, group@ would lose rwp access, and joe + * would lose wp access even though the mode does not exclude those + * permissions. After propagating the everyone@ permissions, the result for + * applying mode 0660 becomes: + * + * owner@:rwp::allow + * joe:rwp::allow + * group@:rwp::allow + * + * Deny aces complicate the matter. For example, the following acl grants + * everyone but joe write access: + * + * joe:wp::deny + * everyone@:rwpx::allow + * + * When applying mode 0660 to this acl, group@ would lose rwp access, and joe + * would lose r access. After propagating the everyone@ permissions, the + * result for applying mode 0660 becomes: + * + * owner@:rwp::allow + * joe:w::deny + * group@:rwp::allow + * joe:r::allow + */ +static int +richacl_propagate_everyone(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) +{ + struct richace who = { .e_flags = RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO }; + struct richacl *acl = alloc->acl; + struct richace *ace; + unsigned int owner_allow, group_allow; + + /* + * If the owner mask contains permissions which are not in the group + * mask, the group mask contains permissions which are not in the other + * mask, or the owner class contains permissions which are not in the + * other mask, we may need to propagate permissions up from the + * everyone@ allow ace. The third condition is implied by the first + * two. + */ + if (!((acl->a_owner_mask & ~acl->a_group_mask) || + (acl->a_group_mask & ~acl->a_other_mask))) + return 0; + if (!acl->a_count) + return 0; + ace = acl->a_entries + acl->a_count - 1; + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace) || !richace_is_everyone(ace)) + return 0; + + owner_allow = ace->e_mask & acl->a_owner_mask; + group_allow = ace->e_mask & acl->a_group_mask; + + if (owner_allow & ~(acl->a_group_mask & acl->a_other_mask)) { + /* Propagate everyone@ permissions through to owner@. */ + who.e_id.special = RICHACE_OWNER_SPECIAL_ID; + if (__richacl_propagate_everyone(alloc, &who, owner_allow)) + return -1; + acl = alloc->acl; + } + + if (group_allow & ~acl->a_other_mask) { + int n; + + /* Propagate everyone@ permissions through to group@. */ + who.e_id.special = RICHACE_GROUP_SPECIAL_ID; + if (__richacl_propagate_everyone(alloc, &who, group_allow)) + return -1; + acl = alloc->acl; + + /* + * Start from the entry before the trailing everyone@ allow + * entry. We will not hit everyone@ entries in the loop. + */ + for (n = acl->a_count - 2; n != -1; n--) { + ace = acl->a_entries + n; + + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace) || + richace_is_owner(ace) || + richace_is_group(ace)) + continue; + if (richace_is_allow(ace) || richace_is_deny(ace)) { + /* + * Any inserted entry will end up below the + * current entry + */ + if (__richacl_propagate_everyone(alloc, ace, + group_allow)) + return -1; + acl = alloc->acl; + } + } + } + return 0; +}